{"id":98800,"date":"2010-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-03-14T02:06:49","modified_gmt":"2017-03-13T20:36:49","slug":"smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                   CENTRAL\u00a0INFORMATION\u00a0COMMISSION\n                                           .....\n<\/pre>\n<p>     F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000667                     F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000668<br \/>\n     F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000669                     F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000670<br \/>\n                                                                     Total\u00a0:\u00a04\u00a0Appeals<\/p>\n<p>                                                     Dated,\u00a0the\u00a028 \u00a0October,\u00a02010.<\/p>\n<pre>\n                                                                      th\n\n\n\n\n Appellant          : Ms.Caroline\u00a0Minj\u00a0\n\n\n Respondent         : State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India,\u00a0Mumbai\n s\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>       These \u00a0 four \u00a0 second\u00adappeals \u00a0 (viz.F.NoS.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000667,\u00a0<br \/>\n668, \u00a0 669 \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 670) \u00a0 filed \u00a0 by \u00a0 Ms.Caroline \u00a0 Minj \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 orders \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellate \u00a0 Authority, \u00a0 State \u00a0 Bank \u00a0 of \u00a0 India, \u00a0 Mumbai \u00a0 were \u00a0 taken \u00a0 up \u00a0 for\u00a0<br \/>\nhearing\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0bunch\u00a0on\u00a020.10.2010\u00a0pursuant\u00a0to\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0notice\u00a0dated\u00a0<br \/>\n29.09.2010.\u00a0 \u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0John\u00a0P.\u00a0Minj,\u00a0while\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondents\u00a0were\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Ms.Sophia\u00a0Dayanand,\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Manager\u00a0<br \/>\n(Law).\n<\/p>\n<p>Appeal\u00a0No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000667:\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    Through \u00a0 her \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication \u00a0 dated \u00a0 13.03.2010, \u00a0 appellant \u00a0 has\u00a0<br \/>\nqueried \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 to \u00a0 explain \u00a0 to \u00a0 her \u00a0 how \u00a0 a \u00a0 certain \u00a0 amount\u00a0<br \/>\nmentioned \u00a0in\u00a0the \u00a0charge \u00a0sheet \u00a0served \u00a0on\u00a0her\u00a0 \u2015 \u00a0and\u00a0which\u00a0led\u00a0to\u00a0her \u00a0<br \/>\neventual\u00a0dismissal\u00a0\u2015\u00a0could\u00a0be\u00a0substantiated.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    No\u00a0responsibility\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0cast\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0to\u00a0answer\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nquery\u00a0which\u00a0lies\u00a0beyond\u00a0the\u00a0scope\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a02(f)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>CIC_AT_A_2010_000667_M_44843.doc\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                             Page\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a04\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.     Appeal\u00a0fails.\u00a0\u00a0Closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appeal\u00a0No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000668:\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      Through\u00a0this\u00a0appeal\u00a0 \u2015 \u00a0linked\u00a0to\u00a0appellant&#8217;s\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a0<br \/>\n06.02.2010 \u00a0 \u2015 \u00a0 she \u00a0 had \u00a0 sought \u00a0 information \u00a0 pertaining \u00a0 to \u00a0 14 \u00a0 items.\u00a0<br \/>\nRespondents\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0two\u00a0items,\u00a0viz.\u00a0items\u00a0<br \/>\nat \u00a0 Sl.Nos.2 \u00a0 and \u00a0 9. \u00a0 \u00a0 For \u00a0 query \u00a0 at \u00a0 Sl.No.6 \u00a0 of \u00a0 her \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondents\u00a0informed\u00a0her\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0huge\u00a0volume\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0spread\u00a0<br \/>\nover\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a01997\u00a0to\u00a01999\u00a0and\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0furnished\u00a0without\u00a0causing\u00a0<br \/>\ndiversion \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents&#8217; \u00a0 resources. \u00a0 \u00a0 Queries \u00a0 at \u00a0 Sl.Nos.7 \u00a0 and \u00a0 10\u00a0<br \/>\nwere \u00a0unclear \u00a0and \u00a0no\u00a0information \u00a0could \u00a0be\u00a0identified \u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed \u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\nrelation\u00a0to\u00a0them.\u00a0\u00a0Items\u00a0at\u00a0Sl.Nos.11\u00a0to\u00a014\u00a0contained\u00a0queries\u00a0demanding\u00a0<br \/>\nexplanations \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 which \u00a0 they \u00a0 declined \u00a0 to \u00a0 give. \u00a0 \u00a0 In\u00a0<br \/>\nrespect\u00a0of\u00a0queries\u00a0at\u00a0Sl.Nos.3\u00a0to\u00a05,\u00a0appellant\u00a0was\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0contrary\u00a0<br \/>\nto\u00a0her\u00a0belief,\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0ever\u00a0created.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     I\u00a0find\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0appellant\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0attempting\u00a0to\u00a0engage\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0<br \/>\nauthority\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0dialogue\u00a0about\u00a0her\u00a0removal\u00a0from\u00a0service\u00a0over\u00a013\u00a0years\u00a0ago.\u00a0<br \/>\nThese\u00a0queries\u00a0are\u00a0an\u00a0expression\u00a0of\u00a0that.\u00a0\u00a0Respondents\u00a0had\u00a0taken\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0<br \/>\nposition\u00a0regarding\u00a0all\u00a0queries\u00a0and\u00a0provided\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0which\u00a0they\u00a0<br \/>\nactually\u00a0held.\u00a0\u00a0Their\u00a0replies\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0are\u00a0all\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0framework\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<br \/>\nlaw.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.     There\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0case\u00a0for\u00a0any\u00a0disclosure\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.     Appeal\u00a0closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appeal\u00a0No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000669:\n<\/p>\n<p>9.       A \u00a0perusal \u00a0of\u00a0appellant&#8217;s \u00a0RTI\u00adapplication \u00a0dated \u00a006.03.2010 \u00a0shows\u00a0<br \/>\nthat \u00a0 these \u00a0 were \u00a0 interrogatory \u00a0 queries \u00a0 calling \u00a0 upon \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\nexplain\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0the\u00a0functioning\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Review\u00a0Committee\u00a0which\u00a013\u00a0years\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC_AT_A_2010_000667_M_44843.doc\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                          Page\u00a02\u00a0of\u00a04<br \/>\n ago\u00a0found\u00a0her\u00a0culpable\u00a0and\u00a0authorized\u00a0her\u00a0removal\u00a0from\u00a0service.\u00a0\u00a0There\u00a0<br \/>\nis\u00a0very\u00a0little\u00a0in\u00a0these\u00a0queries\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0any\u00a0identifiable\u00a0information\u00a0could\u00a0be\u00a0<br \/>\nlinked.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. No\u00a0responsibility\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0cast\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0to\u00a0answer\u00a0such\u00a0<br \/>\ninterrogatories.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.    Appeal\u00a0fails.\u00a0Closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appeal\u00a0No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000670:\n<\/p>\n<p>12. This\u00a0is\u00a0one\u00a0more\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0(dated\u00a015.04.2010)\u00a0through\u00a0which\u00a0<br \/>\nappellant \u00a0 has \u00a0 attempted \u00a0 to \u00a0 interrogate \u00a0 the \u00a0 public \u00a0 authority \u00a0 about \u00a0 their\u00a0<br \/>\nactions\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0disciplinary\u00a0proceedings\u00a0against\u00a0her\u00a0were\u00a0extant.\n<\/p>\n<p>13. There\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0no\u00a0obligation\u00a0to\u00a0answer\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0query\u00a0which\u00a0seeks\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0respondents\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0their\u00a0conduct\u00a0to\u00a0her.\n<\/p>\n<p>CIC_AT_A_2010_000667_M_44843.doc\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                            Page\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a04\n<\/p>\n<p> 14.   Appeal\u00a0fails.\u00a0Closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>15.   Copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0direction\u00a0be\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       (\u00a0A.N.\u00a0TIWARI\u00a0)<br \/>\n                                    CHIEF\u00a0INFORMATION\u00a0COMMISSIONER<\/p>\n<p>CIC_AT_A_2010_000667_M_44843.doc\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                             Page\u00a04\u00a0of\u00a04\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 CENTRAL\u00a0INFORMATION\u00a0COMMISSION &#8230;.. F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000667 F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000668 F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000669 F.No.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000670 Total\u00a0:\u00a04\u00a0Appeals Dated,\u00a0the\u00a028 \u00a0October,\u00a02010. th Appellant : Ms.Caroline\u00a0Minj\u00a0 Respondent : State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India,\u00a0Mumbai s These \u00a0 four \u00a0 second\u00adappeals \u00a0 (viz.F.NoS.CIC\/AT\/A\/2010\/000667,\u00a0 668, \u00a0 669 \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 670) \u00a0 filed \u00a0 by \u00a0 Ms.Caroline \u00a0 Minj \u00a0 against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":561,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010"},"wordCount":561,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010","name":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T20:36:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-caroline-minj-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Caroline Minj vs State Bank Of India on 28 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}