{"id":98873,"date":"2009-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2"},"modified":"2015-02-27T06:35:41","modified_gmt":"2015-02-27T01:05:41","slug":"gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                                                                           -1-\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                              C.M. No. 15028-CII of 2009 and\n                              Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                              Date of decision: 03.07.2009\n\n\n\nGurpreet Singh\n                                                                 ....Petitioner\n\n\n\n                    Versus\n\n\n\n\nJaswinder Singh and others\n                                                              ....Respondents\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA\n\nPresent: - Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate,\n           for the petitioner.\n\n\n                    *****\n<\/pre>\n<p>VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>C.M. No. 15027-CII of 2009<\/p>\n<p>          Allowed as prayed for<\/p>\n<p>C.R. No. 3582 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>          This revision petition is directed against the order dated<\/p>\n<p>24.02.2009 passed by the learned lower appellate Court accepting the<\/p>\n<p>appeal filed against the order of the learned trial Court rejecting the plaint<\/p>\n<p>under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.<\/p>\n<p>          The respondent\/plaintiff brought a suit for declaration claiming<br \/>\n Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                             -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>himself to be the owner of the the property in dispute in pursuance to the<\/p>\n<p>purchase, on the pleadings, that the total sale consideration stood paid to the<\/p>\n<p>owner of the property in dispute, and possession handed over.<\/p>\n<p>          The case set up was, that due to the death of the owner, the sale<\/p>\n<p>deed could not be registered, therefore, he is entitled to get his name entered<\/p>\n<p>in the registered ownership. Consequently, relief of injunction was also<\/p>\n<p>prayed for.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The learned trial Court rejected the plaint by holding it to be<\/p>\n<p>barred by limitation. However, the learned lower appellate Court reversed<\/p>\n<p>the findings on the ground that in the plaint, the relief of injunction against<\/p>\n<p>dispossession was also prayed. The respondent\/plaintiffs pleaded that they<\/p>\n<p>were put in possession of the property in pursuance to the agreement to sell,<\/p>\n<p>under which the total sale consideration stood paid, and they were in<\/p>\n<p>possession. Even prior to the agreement, he was in possession as tenant of<\/p>\n<p>the property in dispute. It was also noticed by the learned appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>that specific pleading was raised in the plaint, that it was in the year 2004<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner herein sought to dispossess the respondent\/plaintiff, thus,<\/p>\n<p>relief of injunction was also claimed. The learned lower appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>held that in view of the pleadings of the parties, specially relief of injunction<\/p>\n<p>having been claimed and also that in view of the provisions of Section 53-A<\/p>\n<p>of the Transfer of Property Act, the suit could not be said to be barred by<\/p>\n<p>limitation, to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil<\/p>\n<p>Procedure. Consequently, allowed the appeal and remanded the case back<\/p>\n<p>to the learned trial Court for decision on merits.<\/p>\n<p>          The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>contends, that the impugned order of the learned lower appellate Court<br \/>\n Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                          -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cannot be sustained in law, as the learned lower appellate Court has<\/p>\n<p>overlooked the fact that the main relief claimed by the respondent\/plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>was that of declaration claiming himself to be owner in pursuance to the<\/p>\n<p>agreement to sell, which was entered into in the year 1998. It is also the<\/p>\n<p>contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the suit for<\/p>\n<p>declaration was to be filed within a period of three years, therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>learned trial Court was fully justified in rejecting the plaint in view of the<\/p>\n<p>averments made in the plaint, specially in view of the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/plaintiff was a tenant in the property in dispute.<\/p>\n<p>          The learned counsel for the petitioner also contends that the<\/p>\n<p>learned lower appellate Court failed to notice that it was a case of clever<\/p>\n<p>drafting to bring a time barred suit within limitation, therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order deserved to be set aside. In support of this contention, the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of<\/p>\n<p>Privy Council in Probodh Kumar Das and others Vs. Dantmara Tea Co.<\/p>\n<p>Ltd and others, AIR 1940 Privy Council wherein the Privy Council was<\/p>\n<p>pleased to lay down that Section 53-A confers no right of action on<\/p>\n<p>transferee in possession under unregistered contract of sale. The reliance<\/p>\n<p>has also been placed on the judgment of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in<\/p>\n<p>Shrimant Shamrao Suryavanshi and another Vs. Pralhad Bhairoba<\/p>\n<p>Suryavanshi (dead) by LRs. and others, AIR 2002 Supreme Court 960<\/p>\n<p>wherein the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court was pleased to lay down that even if the<\/p>\n<p>limitation to bring a suit for specific performance of an agreement is barred<\/p>\n<p>still the unintended vendee is entitled to protect his possession under<\/p>\n<p>Section 53-A in case he fulfils the necessary conditions.<\/p>\n<p>          The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is, that<br \/>\n Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>though the respondent\/plaintiff could defend his possession, however, this<\/p>\n<p>was only a right of defence and gave no cause of action to maintain the suit.<\/p>\n<p>          The learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the<\/p>\n<p>judgment of the Hon&#8217;ble Delhi High Court in Shiv Kumar Gupta Vs.<\/p>\n<p>Kumkum Gupta and others, 2007(5) RCR (Civil) 465 wherein the Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>Delhi High Court has been pleased to lay down, that the legal notice could<\/p>\n<p>not extend the time period for limitation, which was three years to enforce<\/p>\n<p>an agreement by way of suit for specific performance.<\/p>\n<p>          On the basis of the judgments referred to above, the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner contends, that the order passed by the learned<\/p>\n<p>lower appellate Court is liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>          On consideration, I find no force in the contentions raised by the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner. In the case of Shiv Kumar Gupta Vs.<\/p>\n<p>Kumkum Gupta and others (supra), which is relied upon by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner, the Hon&#8217;ble Delhi High Court has been pleased to<\/p>\n<p>reiterate that it is well established law, that for consideration of application<\/p>\n<p>under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only the plaint and the documents filed with<\/p>\n<p>the plaint have to be perused. Once in the plaint, the respondent\/plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>had made out a case bringing the case within limitation by claiming relief of<\/p>\n<p>injunction on the plea that his possession was sought to be disturbed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the Court could not have rejected the plaint. It is a question to be<\/p>\n<p>adjudicated on merits as to whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief claimed,<\/p>\n<p>but in no case the plaint could be rejected when the reading of the plaint<\/p>\n<p>made out a cause of action to maintain the suit, and pleading taken on its<\/p>\n<p>face value, showed that case was within limitation. The pleading in the<\/p>\n<p>plaint can be said to be a case of clever drafting, as possession of plaintiff is<br \/>\n Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                          -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>not disputed.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The learned lower appellate Court was, therefore, fully justified in<\/p>\n<p>reversing the judgment and decree of the learned trial Court.<\/p>\n<p>          No merit.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                        (Vinod K. Sharma)<br \/>\n                                                              Judge<br \/>\nJuly 03, 2009<br \/>\nR.S.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 15028-CII of 2009 and Civil Revision No. 3582 of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of decision: 03.07.2009 Gurpreet Singh &#8230;.Petitioner Versus Jaswinder Singh [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1103,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2"},"wordCount":1103,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2","name":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-27T01:05:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurpreet-singh-vs-jaswinder-singh-and-others-on-3-july-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gurpreet Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Others on 3 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}