{"id":98971,"date":"2009-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-09T05:20:44","modified_gmt":"2018-12-08T23:50:44","slug":"urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                             WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3002 OF 2002\n                 [In the matter of an Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India]\n                                               .....\n                 1. Urmila Agro Farm\n                 2. Vijay Kumar Mittal     ...... ...... Petitioners\n                                     Versus\n                 1. The State of Jharkhand\n                 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro\n                 3. Mr. G.P.A. Kujur       ...... .....     Respondent\/Opposite Parties\n                                           ....\n                 For the Petitioners       :   Mr. G.M. Mishra\n                 For the Respondents       :   S.C. -III\n\n                        PRESENT:\n                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESHWAR SAHAY\n                                       ----\n\nAmareshwar Sahay, J.    In this writ petition the prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to\n\n                 issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the\n\n                 respondents to release the genuine dues payable to the petitioners by the\n\n                 respondents      which     has      been     deducted\/withdrawn        arbitrarily,\n\n                 unreasonably, capriciously behind the back of the petitioners without any\n\n                 notice and or information to the petitioners at the behest of the\n\n                 Respondent No.3 to deprive the petitioners' legitimate dues, non-payment\n\n                 of which is seriously jeopardized them.\n\n                        According to the petitioners an order for supply of 87 Bee-keeping\n\n                 Sets was given to the petitioners after their offer was found to be lowest.\n\n                 Out of 87 Bee-keeping sets, 32 sets were supplied by the petitioners, for\n\n                 which they received the payment as per the contract. The dispute arose\n\n                 only with regard to the supply of remaining 55 Bee-keeping sets which\n\n                 according to the respondents were of sub-standard, and therefore, there\n\n                 were some dispute with regard to the payment of the price of said 55\n\n                 Bee-keeping sets. According to the petitioners, the respondents arbitrarily\n\n                 reduced the contract price and deducted the amount causing serious\n\n                 financial loss to the petitioners and the amount of second bill and third bill\n\n                 submitted by the petitioners were not paid to them.             Though a notice\n\n                 under Section 80 of the C.P.C. was given to the respondents, but when no\n\n                 action was taken then this writ petition has been filed.\n        A counter affidavit has been filed of which the paragraph nos. 11\n\nand 12 are relevant for the purpose of this case. The same are repeated\n\nherein below:\n\n       That it is stated that on the light of the report of the Smt. Meena\n\nThakur, Deputy Collector-cum-Assistant Project Officer, D.R.D.A., Bokaro.\n\nThe District Authority Committee on 5.3.2001 held a meeting under the\n\nChairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro and also informing the\n\npetitioner to attend the meeting. The petitioner was present in the\n\nmeeting and know the entire matter. In meeting it has been decided to\n\nrevise the Bee-keeping set at the rate of Rs.8965\/- each of 3 Sets.\n\n       That it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner did not made\n\nany objection and have accepted the final payment made on 23.3.2001\n\nfor the aforesaid 55 sets supplied by the petitioner. The entire payment\n\nas per revised rate has been made to the petitioner against the Bill dated\n\n24.5.2000<\/pre>\n<p> and 7.8.2000 and that time also petitioner has not made any<\/p>\n<p>objection. So the petitioner is not entitled to any payment which was<\/p>\n<p>already made by the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>                Therefore, from the averments made in the aforesaid two<\/p>\n<p>paragraphs of the counter affidavit, it appears that the main stand of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents are that to resolve the dispute with regard to the payment of<\/p>\n<p>55 Bee-keeping sets, a meeting was held under the Chairmanship of the<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, which was attended by the petitioners also<\/p>\n<p>and in the said meeting it was decided to revise the price of the Bee-<\/p>\n<p>keeping sets @ Rs.8965\/- each of 3 sets and pursuant thereto payment<\/p>\n<p>was made to the petitioner, which the petitioners accepted on 23.3.2001<\/p>\n<p>without any objection. These facts stated in the paragraph nos. 11 and 12<\/p>\n<p>of the counter affidavit have not been disputed by the petitioners in their<\/p>\n<p>rejoinder to the counter affidavit.\n<\/p>\n<p>       From the averments made in the rejoinder to the counter affidavit<\/p>\n<p>it appears that it has not been denied or disputed that the petitioners<br \/>\n                  were present in the meeting held on 5.3.2001 under the Chairmanship of<\/p>\n<p>                 the Deputy Commissioner in which the rate was reduced at Rs.8965\/-<\/p>\n<p>                 each for 3 sets and the petitioner thereafter received the payment for<\/p>\n<p>                 supply of 55 Bee-keeping sets without any objection. In such a situation<\/p>\n<p>                 when the petitioners have already received the payment for supply of<\/p>\n<p>                 remaining 55 bee-keeping sets without any objection, then by filing this<\/p>\n<p>                 writ petition they cannot be allowed to raise same very dispute on the<\/p>\n<p>                 ground that the deduction was made arbitrarily, which is not factually<\/p>\n<p>                 correct.\n<\/p>\n<p>                        Accordingly, in my view, the petitioners have not been able to<\/p>\n<p>                 make out a case for grant of any relief. Hence, having found no merit this<\/p>\n<p>                 writ petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   (AMARESHWAR SAHAY, J.)<\/p>\n<p>Jharkhand High Court,<br \/>\nRanchi. Dated 17.11.2009<br \/>\nN.A.F.R.\/S.I\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3002 OF 2002 [In the matter of an Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] &#8230;.. 1. Urmila Agro Farm 2. Vijay Kumar Mittal &#8230;&#8230; &#8230;&#8230; Petitioners Versus 1. The State [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":336,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009"},"wordCount":336,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009","name":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-08T23:50:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/urmila-agro-farm-through-its-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-17-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Urmila Agro Farm Through Its vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 17 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98971\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}