{"id":990,"date":"2010-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-07-16T21:04:32","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T15:34:32","slug":"jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT,.___\nBANGALORE 7 A\n\nDATED THIS THE 27*\" DAY OF 0CTOBER\"2~O_1fi    _\n\nBEFORE  _\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE Hit.}'LU'jV'AIiI;C\u00a7;\u00a7AMESIi1Ij\n\nCRIMINAL APPE ALa.N0\u00a755S'i0E zoi\u00e9agw  \nBETWEEN: A A A A A\n\nJenny @ Jenny Vijay,\n\nS\/0 Savaridas, V\n\nAged about 24 years, _  _  ' \n\nR\/at 1993,  y       \n\n1\" Cross, Uc;db\u00e9I_nk\"R6_ad,'--,j~._  _    '\n\nR.M.Nagar, B.an~-g:If3_Qre--i'6,.  ..   \"APPELLANT\n\n(By M\/is. S;--sha1\u00a5i:\u00a7ai?a;\u00a7pa.';S:~Agsacniaies, Advs.)\n\nAND:\n\n -  'Stat\u00a7\\2.,9y_ ai{.R.Pura'i\" \u00e9\nRep. byt3.'.P,P;I.\n\nA __H'i 'Ctjalitt g,\n\n'B_aIIga.l(V)\"re.\"_*_v..__  - \"RESPONDENT\n\nI (By'.44Sri.C'i:.}\\\/i.'SriniVas Reddy, HCGP)\n\n \"  This Criminal Appe-at is fiied under Section 374(2) of\n\n* T A'  against the judgment dt.24.4.2008 passed by the Add]-\n  SJ, FTC-IX, Bangalore, Bangaiore city, in S.C.N0.445\/2007 ~\u00ab\n ..._c.<jnVicting the appellant\/accused for the offence P\/U\/S3307,\n 324 of IPC and S\u20acI1C\u20acDCi:{\u00a7\/133133 to undergo imprisonment for 7\n\n\n\n7\n\n.5\n\nyears and to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000\/-- (two lakhs oniy) I.D., to\nundergo imprisonment for 3 years and etc.,\n\nThis Criminal Appeal coming on for hearing this deaiyeethe\nCourt delivered the following:   \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is by the accused-e’Ch’allengingither)rder of.’<\/p>\n
conviction and sentence passed by the’.Fast_A.TrackV_..Court <\/p>\n
Bangalore city, in S.C.N(>.445\/208:7.”dated’   ii<\/p>\n
2. According to  around<\/p>\n
12.00  by means of<\/p>\n
choppe1’ian_d’also  by chopper when she<\/p>\n
intervened to rescue’P.W’.5 and caused grievous injuries to them<\/p>\n
  the complainant to take away her life.\n<\/p>\n
i’tAeeeeei’r{g’:e3z, efneging the offences under Section 307, 324 and<\/p>\n
V ‘V 50(i4(‘b).   the accused had been charge sheeted. The<\/p>\n
i’ incident is said to have taken place at the staff quarters of<\/p>\n
ii A\u00a7Sl]WiI”1i Nursing Home, Akshayanagar, Bangalore. 011<\/p>\n
receiving the message, the SHQ of K.R.Purarn police rushed to<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
Ashwini Nursing Home and recorded the statement of the<\/p>\n
injured in the presence of the Doctor and case has_..__been<\/p>\n
registered in Crime l\\lo.3()l\/2006 for the offencesMpuni’shahl’eV<\/p>\n
under Sections 307, 324, 506(b) of IPC.\n<\/p>\n
recording the statement of the eyewitness ‘and:other__’wiitneis’sesi7<\/p>\n
after conducting rnahazar and cornpleti’ngii’the investi_g”at’ioni:3 the <\/p>\n
K.R.Puram police have filed the ciha.rge_sheet~foirithe above said
\noffences. Since the offence piiinis-hable’\u00bb.under Section 307 of
\nIPC is exclusively._triable.f3y,’ti1e Cou_rtiof_ Sessions, the learned
\nMagistrate hasi–.,Vcos{ninitted the case]; to theiCourt of Sessions.
\nThe Sessions coi,irtfi-\u00bb.\u00a7.’,  Track Court No.IX, Bangalore,<\/p>\n
has examincc-dd in all  ‘Witnesses during the trial and got<\/p>\n
marl\u00e9edill .Vdocurinents–\u00ab”and also several material objects as<\/p>\n
 l. ‘to_:’}’ the defense of the accused was total denial,<\/p>\n
after\u00e9iilhearingii-‘V.both sides, the trial Court has acquitted the<\/p>\n
ii”-v___”-\u00bbaccuse\u20aci.for the offence under Section 506 of IPC while acting<\/p>\n
if  :3’iander.i.–‘Section 235(2) of Cr.P.C. and convicted and sentenced<\/p>\n
 =  for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 324 of<\/p>\n
IPC and he was sentenced t_o undergo imprisonment for 21<\/p>\n
Qty”\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.l,000\/– and default<\/p>\n
sentence of six months imprisonment, for the offence’.–u_nde.r<\/p>\n
Section 324 of IPC and for the offence under <\/p>\n
IPC, he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for..vse”~te”n yeah? K i <\/p>\n
and to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000\/- andMdefaulti’s_ente’noe– <\/p>\n
years. As against the said order of ‘c’o_nvictionv’andy: sentence <\/p>\n
passed, the accused is before this Court on various ‘grounds.<\/p>\n
3. Heard.\n<\/p>\n
 Counsel for the appellant, it<\/p>\n
is not a casc.._Voi’.atte_tnpt i[()…~’lT}LlI’d6I’. The witnesses who have<\/p>\n
 ._Vbeert\u00b0e.xa.;pninyed by”th-ewprosecution are the staff witnesses and<\/p>\n
pthe itco.lleagu,e’s._of the injured and are interested witnesses.<\/p>\n
  have turned hostile to the version of the<\/p>\n
 “-.prosecut.ioh and some of the independent witnesses who were<\/p>\n
A  pi'”3.va.i1ahEe at the spot were not examined. In the absence of<\/p>\n
 .. .,examination of the independent witnesses who are eyewitnesses<\/p>\n
to the incident, the story of the prosecution cannot be believed.
\n.\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
Accordingly, stating that the case against the accused has not
\nbeen proved beyond reasonable doubt, he has sought_ for<\/p>\n
acquittal of the accused.\n<\/p>\n
5. Per–contra, the learned Got\/t. Pleavder <\/p>\n
that, there is cogent evidenceon re.co’rdii’to hold’-M. the acciusied <\/p>\n
guilty of t.he offence. Apart fro1ii’wwt_he evideliceitof  injured,
\nthere are eyewitnesses havei-witnes,sed_ the incident and
\nthey have spokenaboutv,the..o’ver’t pact  thefaccused. It is a
\nclear attempt\u00e9to  i:murder_’_byjA’ .the:iaccttsed in assaulting
\nwith th\u00e9\u00bbs{:h0pperi.a\ufb01C}~ \u00bbovrder”‘to.iescape when Victim Rarnya has<\/p>\n
raised her   feiilil on the hand and 1_ater, it has been<\/p>\n
“‘~o_v_a1nptttated. fI’hereV”‘i’sv-we-ogent evidence on record to hold the<\/p>\n
   offences and the impugned order does not<\/p>\n
 va.nji:if-.V.in:terfei*ence. Accordingly, he has sought for<\/p>\n
 t ‘~\u00bbdismiss’a1,_ ‘I-\n<\/p>\n
6. In the light of the arguments advanced, the points that<\/p>\n
would arise for consideration are:\n<\/p>\n
Y<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
(i) Whether the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable
\ndoubt that, the accused has voluntarily ca sed,hurt to
\nP.W.5 by chopper which is likely to cause,%\ufb01 as such,
\nhe has committed the offence punishable under Section
\n324oflPC?\n<\/p>\n
(ii) Whether the prosecution has proved beyond  V’ 4_
\ndoubt that, the accused has assaulted  ~.. 2<\/p>\n
means of chopper with an intent ‘te.ca’;ise_; her i(_leathT:and,<\/p>\n
thereby committed the offence,’ pu_r1ishable u.nder”S’ect’i-an<\/p>\n
307 of EPC’?\n<\/p>\n
(iii) Whether the prose.cutionii’ha;slproved.be’yondi}:easonable<\/p>\n
dou.bt that, the accused,.has'<cornmitted–an offence of
\ncriminal. intimidation. by.'threavten_ing'–l?.W.2 Sabitha?<\/p>\n
7. In the,.case—on ligand,’  thefd_ate ‘of?\u00abthe alleged incident,
\nthe ac,.t:usedi’iga:ine:d eatry\ufb02iinto the staff quarters of<\/p>\n
Ashwini’,Nursing_.i’iiit).\ufb01ie,,:_:”by”” holding chopper in his hand,<\/p>\n
assaulted onthe, V_r’igiht palm of the victim, which is completely<\/p>\n
  and when P.W.2 tried to rescue P.W.5, the accused<\/p>\n
  P.W.2 and threatened to kill her. It is also on<\/p>\n
1’eco1’d that, the accused was caught at the place of incident and<\/p>\n
 the”\u00ab.weapon used for the commission of the offence was also<\/p>\n
seized at the spot. The motive behind the commission of the<\/p>\n
offence is that, since the victim has not obliged to marry him,<\/p>\n
“it”\n<\/p>\n
the accused has retaliated against her having hatched a plan to<\/p>\n
finish her off and when he attempted to assault on the<\/p>\n
of the body, the victim P.W.5 raised her hand anciltiiiev  <\/p>\n
on her hand and it was severed.\n<\/p>\n
8. The evidence of  that,
\nduring 2005 she was w:;si\u00a7ing  As\ufb01wisi Nursing
\nHome and she used to  samples and
\nsend the    the accused used to
\nget the1ie.pQ\ufb01~s::i~%~oiin_   over to the victim and at
\nthat tin1’e,’- ‘with her and he put forth a<\/p>\n
proposal “o–f_’l marriage “her, for which she refused and<\/p>\n
‘V ”  _  she wlasvshifted to Ramamurthinagar Branch and the<\/p>\n
  ‘acscuseld._use’d.,to’–;nake phone calls to her asking her to come to<\/p>\n
thepplchuvrchdarid to other places, for which she used to refuse.<\/p>\n
 ‘Three d\u00e9iys prior to the incident, when herself and one of her<\/p>\n
 –..V’\u00b0r.ie_nid Urna\u00bbP.W.4 had been to shop to purchase sweater and<\/p>\n
.—-when her friend Uma went to purchase fruits and the victim was<\/p>\n
standing on the road, accused came there and questioned as to<\/p>\n
33*’<\/p>\n
when she has no time to go with him, how she got time to go<\/p>\n
with her friend and showed a chopper and threatened  for<\/p>\n
which, she being frightened ran away. Subsequent.li_y;<\/p>\n
10.1 3 .2006 around \u00a30.30 am. when she ca1ne_bsac.li\u00a7’:t\u00a3,)iIier   <\/p>\n
after night duty for rest, between 1 11:45 tel  i’ioo’n,i <\/p>\n
went inside the room and eaughther neck and ae_saalie.dVVoti her –. 0′<\/p>\n
right palm with the chopper d.L1el*to’~.whic.h,”‘her  was<\/p>\n
completely severed and   help of skin and<\/p>\n
when P.W.2 cameiitores-ciueiiher, thefacculsed has also assaulted<\/p>\n
on her hand  cried for help P.W.l-\n<\/p>\n
Dr.Sree’dha’-r  the spot and admitted her to the<\/p>\n
hospital ~the-Doctor..Vhas:.ii~femoved the palm and admitted her<\/p>\n
 .__to  ‘Since l\\\/Ialya Hospital demanded Rs.3 lakhs<\/p>\n
 for later shifted to Victoria Hospital.\n<\/p>\n
9.\u00bbfl’he evidence of P.W.l~Dr.Sreedhar, who rushed to the<\/p>\n
  spot iinmediately after the incident is to the effect that, on the<\/p>\n
0  -date of incident around 12.00 noon while he was attending the<\/p>\n
patients P.W.2 came running having sustained injures to her<\/p>\n
3*”\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span>
\nright hand and informed that one person is attempting to<\/p>\n
Commit murder of Ramya and he irnrnediateiy rushedto the<\/p>\n
rest room and found that the right palm of <\/p>\n
amputated and it was hanging with skin. Iin’r!1__ediate13i.;ii  <\/p>\n
treated her and also he treated 1>.wu72}:nd ~inii7orn1ed:_”the:poiicei<\/p>\n
through a letter as per Ex.P.1He treated. P.W,i2.*,  i’np:;ti’eni”\u00bb._<\/p>\n
from 10.11.2006 to 17.11.200oi”ai_i(} he has i’_iopiineio5 that the
\ninjuries sustained by her grieyous..1n,:n’ature. it it<\/p>\n
versioniof the pro:iee,uiti\u00bbovn’-a_ii’d went to the extent of saying that<\/p>\n
she has noti’–sVustaine_dAanyainjuries and she does not know the<\/p>\n
 ,.V_inCi’de.nti._oV.But heriiievideiice goes to show that she has sustained<\/p>\n
 p_iii1ju_r’ie.siiandsiiewas treated in the hospital}.<\/p>\n
1\u20ac__,i1:’P.W.4–Uma is wor1<.in_g in the Nursing Home and she<\/p>\n
  –has;.not supported the version of the prosecution. PWs.3 and 6<\/p>\n
 ….whc> are the panchas for the seizure panchanarna have also<\/p>\n
turned hostile. P.W.7 is the constable of K.R.Puram poiice<\/p>\n
10<\/span>
\nstation who has given the seized material objects for chemical<\/p>\n
examination.\n<\/p>\n
12. As per the evidence of  <\/p>\n
who was working as a Sr.Specialist ;;itii”V’iCto_ria Hosp’ita_lVdu’i’ing’.<\/p>\n
the said period, he has treated the injure.diR_amyaio_n :l’0.\u00b0l  <\/p>\n
and she was taken to the hospitaliiibgfiier coileaggueis around 4.30
\npm. with 3 history of aeseult at ‘the afternoon and on
\nher exainination,,_it was… found’ –.that  sustained the<\/p>\n
following f()u1’l*.iVnju\u20acri’e_s: .   V\n<\/p>\n
1.. Amputation   –1im’b.\n<\/p>\n
2. One incisedv.wou_nd._over the right exterior aspect of right<\/p>\n
elbow measur_ing’i3 xi’\/2 X ‘\/2 cms.\n<\/p>\n
 wound over the right shoulder upper 1\/3″: of<\/p>\n
 righftirrni’measuring 4 x % X ‘\/2.\n<\/p>\n
4} One lvl?.ClSr3s.CliiWOu1}d over the right shoulder measuring 3 x 1\/2
\nxi’-\/2 Cinsf i<\/p>\n
 per the evidence of \u00a73.W.8, injury No.1 is grievous in nature<\/p>\n
end’ the rest are simple in nature and in this regard, wound<\/p>\n
ii Hiiciertificate was issued as per _Ex.P7. P.W.5 the injured Ramya<\/p>\n
ye’<\/p>\n
11<\/span>
\nwas hospitalised for nearly .10 days from 10.11.2006 to<\/p>\n
20.11.2006 at Victoria Hospital, Orthopedic Departmeent–.eand<\/p>\n
the wound certificate at Ex.P7 would reveal that <\/p>\n
limb of P.W.5 was amputated.\n<\/p>\n
13. The evidence of was <\/p>\n
working as Asst. Director of F01″e.r_1s:ic.._La1)o1’atoi’y,._BaAIt}ga1ore, is
\nto the effect that, he received “sefV}ei.1 “articles including<\/p>\n
blood sample .7  the FSL.\n<\/p>\n
   the investigating officers, who<\/p>\n
have deposedii to the effect’ of Conducting investigation and<\/p>\n
 the 15Ao’licve-\u00abConstable who carried the FIR to the<\/p>\n
1.S.i’1~The offences alleged against the accused are under<\/p>\n
  324, 307 and 506(b) of IPC. Despite some<\/p>\n
__d.isc1’epancies and some of the witnesses turning hostile<\/p>\n
1 including P.W.2, the fact remains that P.Ws.2 and 5 have<\/p>\n
V,<\/p>\n
12<\/span>
\nsustained injuries and that the accused has assaulted P.W.5 by<\/p>\n
means of M.O.6, the chopper and due to the assault, henright<\/p>\n
palm was completely amputated. Of course, the defen_se~V<\/p>\n
accused is that this injured P.W.5 was in love   ll<\/p>\n
who was suffering from kidney failu’fe”and\u00ab whengh.el’refused to”:<\/p>\n
marry her, she has inflicted injury t0l’h_el*self andallso that ‘sas-<\/p>\n
had raised a loan to the tune Of’ lakhs  from<\/p>\n
the accused and when there was’lallde.inand..t0 return the same, a
\nfalse complaint has been filed against   <\/p>\n
l6. ‘%”‘ho!.:gl’1,’:’:ta.therl”ind’e;1erident witnesses have not been<\/p>\n
examined,lll’I:;uVt thellevideincei’ of Dr.P.W.8 who has treated the<\/p>\n
 llthaevidence of P.W.5 and P.W.2 to some<\/p>\n
 pextenttsw–Qui(l”dep–i.Ct that, the accused has attempted to commit<\/p>\n
thetnurdyerlthe victim and in order to avoid, when the victim<\/p>\n
 raisevd1’he1′ hand the blow fell on her hand, due to which her<\/p>\n
  ri’g–ht_l..palm was completely severed.<\/p>\n
iv<\/p>\n
:3
\nI7. it is seen that the injured has sustained as many as<\/p>\n
four injuries and the accused has not only caused injury to<\/p>\n
P.W.5, but also caused injury to P.W.2-Sabitha whoji:wie”nt:”to<\/p>\n
rescue P.W.5 from the accused. The trial  <\/p>\n
convicted the accused for the offences j_pjuni;shab!.e V under’.<\/p>\n
Sections 324 and 307 of IPC, _ Although, <\/p>\n
charged for the offence under  506(5). when
\nthe accused was held  f()I5_iithei.ioff.e_ncesA _underiSiection 324
\nand 307 of {PC itmay  him guilty for<\/p>\n
the offence      <\/p>\n
18.  a,lso-_not\u00a3ced~~i’that accused rather tried to make<\/p>\n
 ._j_false”lpleaj’ that  in love with one Doctor and since he<\/p>\n
 ‘tina:fry’–.her, she attempted to inflict injury to herself.<\/p>\n
However,, .the_. version of the prosecution and also the evidence<\/p>\n
V”-on recorcfelearly reveals that the accused was forcing P.W.5 to<\/p>\n
i -in’arr.\u00a7,=5 him when accidentally she came in contact with her in<\/p>\n
-\u00bb-thee course of official work and when she refused, having<\/p>\n
determined he attempted on the life of P.W.5 Rarnya and also in<\/p>\n
\\\u00a7<:\/<\/p>\n
14<\/span>
\nthe course of the alleged incident when P.W.2 intervened to<\/p>\n
rescue P.W.5, the blow also fell on her hand.<\/p>\n
19. The trial Court has sentenced the  <\/p>\n
offence under Section 324 of \u00a5PC and”sHent’ence-d h.;i\u00abmiiV:t’o_ _unde’rgo’1<\/p>\n
imprisonment for one year andto payiafine of .lA.,0O0f\u00ab’:<li<\/p>\n
the offence under Section  _IPCi,"~.th'e–iiaccuised was
\nsentenced to undergo    fine of
\nRs.2,00,000\/-. 1n._the  for the
\ncommission'. has refused to
\nmarry the  against her, he attempted to
\nCommit herrnu1'der. . l<\/p>\n
 "_2l(},_'How.ever, in modification of the order of sentence<\/p>\n
paissued,  meet the ends of justice if the accused is<\/p>\n
ii""'\u00ab.__ii'-sentencedli' to undergo R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of<\/p>\n
 and default sentence of six months simple<\/p>\n
  ~\u00bbv–i-ii1_p1'isonment for the offence under Section. 307 of IPC and for<\/p>\n
the offence under Section 324 of ZPC to undergo R.I. for one<\/p>\n
15<\/span>
\nyear and to pay 21 fine of Rs.2,000\/–, in default, to undergo<\/p>\n
sirnpie imprisonment for two months. Both the sentences are<\/p>\n
ordered to run concurrently. The accused is entitled”fofrgthye<\/p>\n
benefit of set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. for     <\/p>\n
detention already undergone during the iperiod of <\/p>\n
triai. If the fine amount is depositediteheisaid att}.(}\u00a5.t:\u00a511 sha\u00a71i”i2eii’–..L<\/p>\n
paid to P.W.5, the injured.\n<\/p>\n
21. Appeaiis a1Iow.ed.:.i1iw.p2u.’it.  it <\/p>\n
sa\/\u00a7_
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT,.___ BANGALORE 7 A DATED THIS THE 27*” DAY OF 0CTOBER”2~O_1fi _ BEFORE _ THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE Hit.}’LU’jV’AIiI;C\u00a7;\u00a7AMESIi1Ij CRIMINAL APPE ALa.N0\u00a755S’i0E zoi\u00e9agw BETWEEN: A A A A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2363,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010"},"wordCount":2363,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010","name":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T15:34:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jenny-jenny-vijay-vs-state-by-k-r-puram-p-s-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jenny @ Jenny Vijay vs State By K R Puram P S on 27 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/990\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}