{"id":99261,"date":"2008-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-10T03:17:11","modified_gmt":"2015-09-09T21:47:11","slug":"therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nLA.App..No. 827 of 2005()\n\n\n1. THERATH KAIPRATH YESODA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THERATH KAIPRATH VASANTHY,\n3. THERATH KAIPRATH RAJAN,\n4. THERATH KAIPRATH RAMANI,\n5. THERATH KAIPRATH PRIYADHATHAN,\n6. PRASANNA BALAGOPAL, D\/O.O.K.RAGHAVAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SPL. TAHSILDAR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.VATHSALAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.C.CHERIAN,SR.SC.,RAILWAYS\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :26\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n         KURIAN JOSEPH &amp; HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.\n             ----------------------------------------------\n        L.A.A. Nos.827\/05, 1382\/05, 116\/06 &amp; 939\/07\n             ----------------------------------------------\n                    Dated 26th June, 2008.\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>Kurian Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nC.M.Appln. Nos.1882\/05 in LAA.1382\/05 &amp; 1078\/07 in LAA<\/p>\n<p>939\/07 : Delay condoned.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The State is aggrieved by the fixation of land value by<\/p>\n<p>the reference court, Sub Court, Thalassery. The acquisition is for<\/p>\n<p>the purpose of doubling of railway line and expansion of Kannur<\/p>\n<p>Town Railway Station. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the land<\/p>\n<p>value approximately at the rate of Rs.16,000\/- per cent.           The<\/p>\n<p>reference court granted enhancement at the rate of 75%.<\/p>\n<p>          2.    According to the claimants in LAR 35\/02(LAA<\/p>\n<p>827\/05), they are aggrieved since there is no proper fixation of<\/p>\n<p>land value. There is also a contention that the fixation of the<\/p>\n<p>market value for the structures is not proper.            As far as the<\/p>\n<p>contention regarding structures is concerned, the reference court<\/p>\n<p>has observed that the claimants had not had any grievance<\/p>\n<p>before the Land Acquisition Officer. But the fact remains that the<\/p>\n<p>claimants have taken up the issue before the reference court. It<\/p>\n<p>LAA NO.827\/05 &amp; connected cases   2<\/p>\n<p>is now settled law that the claimants need raise their contentions<\/p>\n<p>and claims only before the reference court and the court is called<\/p>\n<p>upon to answer the reference adverting to the claims made by the<\/p>\n<p>claimants before the reference court. As far as value of structures<\/p>\n<p>is concerned, the valuation made by the Land Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n<p>is based on the PWD rate and in several cases, this court has<\/p>\n<p>granted 30% enhancement taking into consideration the market<\/p>\n<p>value of the materials and such enhancement has been sustained<\/p>\n<p>by the apex court also. As far as the land value is concerned, we<\/p>\n<p>find that there is some substance in the contention taken by the<\/p>\n<p>claimants that the property along with the building is situated in<\/p>\n<p>the heart of the town and it is not as if a remotely situated<\/p>\n<p>property is taken for the purpose of doubling a railway line. The<\/p>\n<p>purpose of acquisition is not merely doubling of railway line, but<\/p>\n<p>expansion of Kannur Railway Station also. This crucial difference<\/p>\n<p>in the case of the claimants in LAR 35\/02 is not taken into<\/p>\n<p>consideration by the reference court.      As far as the fixation<\/p>\n<p>already made to the tune of Rs.28,000\/- per cent, we find that the<\/p>\n<p>court is justified in granting such an enhancement in view of the<\/p>\n<p>finding of the fact that the acquired properties are situated in an<\/p>\n<p>LAA NO.827\/05 &amp; connected cases   3<\/p>\n<p>important area of Kannur Town, very near to the Railway Station<\/p>\n<p>and Bus stand.       It is seen from the report of the Advocate<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner that the distance of the acquired property is only<\/p>\n<p>30 meters from the Municipal Bus stand and 100 meters from the<\/p>\n<p>Railway Station. The evidence adduced in the case indicated land<\/p>\n<p>value at the rate of Re.1 lakh per cent, but the reference court has<\/p>\n<p>rightly found that they are not similar and similarly situated, in<\/p>\n<p>view of the difference in the respective advantages to the<\/p>\n<p>property. Even according to the reference court, the property<\/p>\n<p>covered by Ext.A1 series is in the vicinity of the acquired land.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, granting 75% enhancement cannot be said to be<\/p>\n<p>excessive. Therefore, we dismiss the the appeals, LAA 116\/06<\/p>\n<p>and 939\/07.\n<\/p>\n<p>           3. As far as LAA 827\/05 filed by the claimants (the<\/p>\n<p>appellants\/claimants in LAA 827\/05 have limited their claim to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.50,000\/- per cent) and LAA 1382\/05 filed by the State are<\/p>\n<p>concerned, the judgment and decree under appeal are set aside<\/p>\n<p>and the matter is remitted to the reference court for fresh<\/p>\n<p>consideration, in the light of the observations contained in this<\/p>\n<p>judgment. The parties shall appear before the reference court on<\/p>\n<p>LAA NO.827\/05 &amp; connected cases   4<\/p>\n<p>4.8.2008 and the reference shall be answered within another<\/p>\n<p>three months.        In view of the remand as above, the<\/p>\n<p>appellants\/claimants in LAA 827\/05 shall be entitled to refund of<\/p>\n<p>the court fee.  The stay petitions in the appeals are dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                        KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>tgs<\/p>\n<p>                              KURIAN JOSEPH &amp;<\/p>\n<p>                          HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ<\/p>\n<p>          &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br \/>\nL.A.A. Nos.827\/05, 1382\/05, 116\/06 &amp; 939\/07\n<\/p>\n<p>          &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                        J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>                  Dated 26th June, 2008.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM LA.App..No. 827 of 2005() 1. THERATH KAIPRATH YESODA, &#8230; Petitioner 2. THERATH KAIPRATH VASANTHY, 3. THERATH KAIPRATH RAJAN, 4. THERATH KAIPRATH RAMANI, 5. THERATH KAIPRATH PRIYADHATHAN, 6. PRASANNA BALAGOPAL, D\/O.O.K.RAGHAVAN, Vs 1. SPL. TAHSILDAR, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":684,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008"},"wordCount":684,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008","name":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-09T21:47:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/therath-kaiprath-yesoda-vs-spl-tahsildar-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Therath Kaiprath Yesoda vs Spl. Tahsildar on 26 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}