{"id":99417,"date":"2009-11-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-13T01:57:14","modified_gmt":"2017-12-12T20:27:14","slug":"rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 14969 of 2004(F)\n\n\n1. RETHNA BHAI, W\/O. RAMESHAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,\n\n3. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :10\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n                   -------------------------------------------\n          W.P(C).Nos.21327 OF 2003 &amp; 14969 OF 2004\n                   -------------------------------------------\n            Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009\n\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>1.The petitioners in these writ petitions applied for being<\/p>\n<p>  considered for the post of Lecturer in Malayalam in the<\/p>\n<p>  Training   Colleges       under       the         Collegiate  Education<\/p>\n<p>  Department of the State Government in terms of Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>  notification of the Public Service Commission.<\/p>\n<p>2.The entitlement of the petitioner in W.P(C).14969\/04 stands<\/p>\n<p>  rejected by the PSC on the ground that she did not have the<\/p>\n<p>  requisite experience in as much as her experience as<\/p>\n<p>  primary departmental teacher in a school is not an<\/p>\n<p>  experience entitled to be reckoned.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.W.P(C).21327\/03 is filed by one of the candidates<\/p>\n<p>  challenging the inclusion of candidates who have not passed<\/p>\n<p>  the National Eligibility Test (NET) in Education, also in the<\/p>\n<p>WPC.21327\/03 &amp; 14969\/04<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  field of choice, for selection and appointment in terms of<\/p>\n<p>  Ext.P1 notification. In opposition to W.P(C).21327\/03, the<\/p>\n<p>  PSC has placed on record a counter affidavit, taking the<\/p>\n<p>  specific stand that the candidate ought to have NET<\/p>\n<p>  qualification in the concerned subject and also in Education<\/p>\n<p>  for being considered for appointment to the Training<\/p>\n<p>  Colleges.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.The different posts notified as per Ext.P1 relating to the<\/p>\n<p>  Training Colleges are posts in the Faculty of Education and<\/p>\n<p>  therefore, the insistence of the UGC, which have been<\/p>\n<p>  agreed to by the PSC in its counter affidavit, that a<\/p>\n<p>  candidate has to possess NET in Education and in the<\/p>\n<p>  concerned subject stands.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.When these writ petitions were heard earlier on 3.10.2007,<\/p>\n<p>  the PSC had placed on record that a candidate shall possess<\/p>\n<p>  NET in Education as well as in the concerned subject.<\/p>\n<p>  Accordingly, it was declared that the candidates for selection<\/p>\n<p>WPC.21327\/03 &amp; 14969\/04<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  and appointment to the Faculty of Education in the Training<\/p>\n<p>  Colleges in different departments have to possess NET<\/p>\n<p>  qualification in Education and also NET qualification in the<\/p>\n<p>  concerned subject.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.Thereafter,        by  common    order     dated    19.2.2008,<\/p>\n<p>  R.P.Nos.1051\/07 and 1126\/07 were ordered vacating the<\/p>\n<p>  aforesaid common judgment except to the extent of the<\/p>\n<p>  findings which were protected by that order.             While<\/p>\n<p>  considering       those two  review   petitions,  this   Court<\/p>\n<p>  specifically stated that the issue that arises for decision<\/p>\n<p>  ultimately, is as to whether a candidate, for being considered<\/p>\n<p>  for appointment as a Lecturer in Malayalam in a Training<\/p>\n<p>  College in the State of Kerala, requires NET qualification in<\/p>\n<p>  Education and also NET in Malayalam.           Another review<\/p>\n<p>  petition which escaped from being disposed of then, viz.,<\/p>\n<p>  R.P.No.1119\/07, has been ordered by me today, adopting the<\/p>\n<p>  common order in R.P.Nos.1051\/07 and 1126\/07. The writ<\/p>\n<p>  petitioner in W.P(C).14969\/04 (Retna Bhai&#8217;s case) contends<\/p>\n<p>WPC.21327\/03 &amp; 14969\/04<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  that the prescription is only optional, in the sense that NET<\/p>\n<p>  qualification may be either in Malayalam or in Education.<\/p>\n<p>  The petitioner in W.P(C).21327\/03, Deneshan, takes the<\/p>\n<p>  stand that NET qualification ought to be in Education even if<\/p>\n<p>  the applicant has NET qualification in Malayalam.           The<\/p>\n<p>  question therefore is as to whether NET qualification in<\/p>\n<p>  Education is compulsory for the purpose of being considered<\/p>\n<p>  for appointment as Lecturer in Malayalam in a Training<\/p>\n<p>  College or is it sufficient if NET qualification is obtained<\/p>\n<p>  either in Malayalam or in Education.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.Following the order dated 19.2.2008 on R.P.Nos. 1051\/07<\/p>\n<p>  and 1126\/07, different other materials were placed on<\/p>\n<p>  record, on the basis of which, the PSC has taken a stand that<\/p>\n<p>  its earlier plea was an error and it would be sufficient if NET<\/p>\n<p>  qualification is obtained either in Malayalam or in<\/p>\n<p>  Education.       The qualifications prescribed for the post of<\/p>\n<p>  Lecturer in Training Colleges, as stated in the short counter<\/p>\n<p>WPC.21327\/03 &amp; 14969\/04<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p> affidavit filed by the PSC, following directions of this Court,<\/p>\n<p> are as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     &#8220;(i) Master Degree in the concerned subject or<\/p>\n<p>     discipline with at least 55% marks or its equivalent and<\/p>\n<p>     good academic records.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (ii) M.Ed degree with knowledge of special methods of<\/p>\n<p>     teaching the subjects.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (iii) Three years teaching experience in Schools or<\/p>\n<p>     Colleges after acquiring the personnel qualifications.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (iv) Must have passed a comprehensive test specially<\/p>\n<p>     conducted for the purpose by UGC or any agency duly<\/p>\n<p>     constituted by the State Govt. in this behalf.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             When qualifications are equal preference shall be<\/p>\n<p>     given to candidates who possess adequate knowledge<\/p>\n<p>     in Malayalam. Candidates need to possess either NET<\/p>\n<p>     in Education or NET in the concerned subject<\/p>\n<p>     (Malayalam) to be eligible for selection in Training<\/p>\n<p>     Colleges&#8221;.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>WPC.21327\/03 &amp; 14969\/04<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 6<\/span><\/p>\n<p> The specific plea of the PSC is that candidates need to<\/p>\n<p> possess NET in Education or NET in the subject concerned<\/p>\n<p> to be eligible for selection to Training Colleges.         The<\/p>\n<p> materials placed by the UGC is also not decisive to conclude<\/p>\n<p> that an aspirant should possess NET qualification in<\/p>\n<p> Education and NET in the concerned subject for being<\/p>\n<p> eligible for selection as a Lecturer in a Training College.<\/p>\n<p> In view of what is stated above, W.P(C).21327\/03 is<\/p>\n<p> dismissed.        W.P(C).14969\/04 is allowed as prayed for.<\/p>\n<p> Having regard to the issues involved, the parties are<\/p>\n<p> directed to bear their respective costs.<\/p>\n<p>                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                           THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>kkb.5\/11.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 14969 of 2004(F) 1. RETHNA BHAI, W\/O. RAMESHAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, &#8230; Respondent 2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, 3. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, For Petitioner :SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":841,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009"},"wordCount":841,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009","name":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-12T20:27:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rethna-bhai-vs-kerala-public-service-commission-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rethna Bhai vs Kerala Public Service Commission on 10 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}