{"id":9945,"date":"2009-11-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-23T09:27:39","modified_gmt":"2018-04-23T03:57:39","slug":"shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH 005123' 01:' KARNATAKA AT  _\n\nDATED TE-HS THE 6TH DAY oF_NoVEMm;RT200\u00a7P;2_ Arm SR: (LA. KREEEHNAPPA, ADVS.)\n\n' ':'\u00a7._N }l'_._:C'    \"\"\" \n\nA   \u00a3,I:+1;R4:':;\u20ac;\u00a7*g\"r>:aT1L S\/Q SR1 SHIVANAGQUDA PATEL\n\n._ \"'__P.\u00a3'3ED7<\u00a7\u00a7.BOi5'T 32 YEARS\n\nA ' Rza NG;j_1.IE6, 4'"! FLOOR,\n""3R\ufb01..__NiA\u00a5\u00a7\u20ac, 2% CROSS, NPICS LAYQUK\n\nBAsA_vEsHwARANA.I3_Rf;f;:\":._\n\n(BY SR: ':'.v. VMAYA RAGHAVAN, Amr. FOR R..:;'_:'&'i\u00a7g}..f: f  \n\nTHIS PETITION IS FELEQ UNDER  \n\nC.P.C., AGAENST THE ORDER DA'I'Eb ~\u00a33\"?'.'1-0A.2\u00a33_()9_P}XSfE3E\u00a7D.jiN V'\n\nEX.P.No.1'?\"\u20ac)Gj 2003 ON THE FILE 01=*,A'I'H:E_\u00a7'DL;V.'c:TY:_ j\nCIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH 4-e=1\u00bb),<_ REJEc:fr:N(3_ 'E.'H.I_3:"=\nAPPLICATION FiLE\u00a7 UNDER SEC; :51 QRCRC. I *\n\nThis Petition having bee11__L: 'Ib\u00abf:V._org17ers on\n29.10.2009, coming nvf0r'_pr\u00abjn<}uz"1\u00a7;:3:ns;nt this day, the\nCourt proneunced the foilt;1.vi,21g:  ;    ' \n\n...C.?...~1...1..:.3-"\u00e9.;._'E';_A3iEl__i,,  %\n\nTh\u20acV:"'p\u20ac\u00a7'titiOI\u00a7}\u00e9'5V:'V" the judgment debtor in\n\nEx.Pe1:i1:i0r1 NE)'-.--. He is (telling in question the\n\n'orcier Q?.10;2*@G9.\u00ab::1s a: Ann\u20acxur6~D to the petitiaia,\n\n  " the Executing Cami: has rejectsd the\n\n   appiicgiji\ufb01n 'A  by the peii\ufb01cner her\ufb01in to recail the\n\n \u00abgitslivaxy xi:-.\u00a7\u00e9:*:'\u00b0a31t and has thereafter r\u00e9isszzed the delivary\n\n   with Eibsrty is break spasm {ha Eaafrk, if the\n\n '=--{:\u00a7;*@1};ii$\u20ac:$ \u00a33 under iacfzi\u00e9. Tha respandents herein are the\n\n1 L R  ' ~ \ufb01\u00e9cree ha\ufb01derg, 'g\n\n'3'\n\n\n\n2. The brief facts leading to the eupuguee --(_')':1'de\u00ab.t'_:\n\nthat the petitioner herein who is the son    "\n\nreependent and the brother of the Zsecerui  -I1ad'--V\u00e9\n\nizlstituted a suit in 0.s.:sIe.793\/2904 "\n\nrespondents herein and also hie.: i11other'---S_:11t., 'V<\/pre>\n
Pati} and sister Smt. Ni\u00a7n3.e1}a  ‘eijvit  one for
\npax\ufb01\ufb01on and separate   1  schedule
\nproperties. In herein who
\nwere the  e\ufb01piiea\ufb01on in I.A.No.10
\n‘1.1}I1d\u20acI’  of C.?.C. (hereinafter<\/p>\n
referred \ufb01e ae  for an Carder ef mandatory<\/p>\n
_ injune\u00a7;ie1:e.. te reeeiol\ufb02re ithe plain\ufb01ff from the suit ‘A’<\/p>\n
  The Erie} Court had dismissed the said<\/p>\n
epe1ieeeie:e”‘e~e%.. e\u00a7{;”its order dated 39.07.2008. The<\/p>\n
V–reepo’f:de11etAe” ‘Xvere therefere before this Court in<\/p>\n
 ][%\u00e9gm.e.:\u00a7e.eovzgzaoos {em}. This Ceuri after detailed<\/p>\n
 ..eeeeiee:eeen, by iis ereer dated 1.30.2088 aliewed the<\/p>\n
  see aside the impugned erder ef the triei Court<\/p>\n
.\u00a3<\/p>\n
,-\n<\/p>\n
II<\/p>\n
and ganted an order of adwintex\u00e9m mandatory   _<\/p>\n
for removal of the petitioner herein fxfem peeseeeio:i”<\u00a7f\u00ab~1;he" * a 'V<\/p>\n
piaint 'A' seheduie property and ree\u00a70r;:tti0nA'eof <\/p>\n
ante as existed prior to  ._    *<\/p>\n
petitioner herein ques\ufb01oned t1jze..VV<\u00a7rC16'r_vLAbefeI'e.3;11i?,:\u00a7HC*I1'b1\u20ac
\nSupreme Court, the  ?eti_'\u00a3;ion was not<\/p>\n
entertained.\n<\/p>\n
3. ”  ciated 01.10.2008 in
\nM.F.A.No-,8C=’f 1\u00ab.as.Wa\ufb02ab}e for execution was<\/p>\n
put inte exee41,;1:i:3I:VaVV”a::_j; “r’,I:1’e.’:_i:e4spo11dente herein by \ufb01ling the<\/p>\n
  E;\\fo;1?Z_QMQV\/2008. At an earlier point, an<\/p>\n
 ‘-\u00a3}’\u00a7.;\u00a7e(;t, <\/p>\n
the petitioner herein who is the <\/p>\n
pending execution petition \ufb011ed_the \u00a3.#pp}ieatief3;VV\u00bbfo::   ,<\/p>\n
of the delivery warrant which  to 15\u00a2 *  The
\npetitioner is therefore  :V%’..\u00a2Z’3*\u00a31’ee:t~<:;oz1teA1'1eiI1g that
\nthe interim orderef mendeter\ufb01 ':.granted- is not
\navailable   itself is new
\ndisposed ' 'off' –\n<\/p>\n
4.  jelolla, learned ee\ufb02ier eeuneei<\/p>\n
on behalf ef   !V_[ei’i;}appa, lear\ufb01e\u00e9 Ceunee} fer the<\/p>\n
‘V “peti\ufb01i-o\u00a7;ie;,:’*-eexxd. S:\u20aciV ‘if”.”~’.’:”‘;’ ‘Vijaya Raghevan, Eearned Counsel<\/p>\n
‘fer   and perused the entire petitieri<\/p>\n
,  pager?’<\/p>\n
 _ [L5, ” -… :’O:1 hearing the respective ieamed ileum-eei, it<\/p>\n
 of’:e–..:s\u00a7:;,~;e:e=\u00a5:..'{13..?iee the queetien fer eensieiera\ufb01on in this petitiee<\/p>\n
  ‘ is._e}\u00a7tIr1 regard te the stjus of the interim order on the<\/p>\n
disposal of the main matter. Fllfth\ufb01f it is  <\/p>\n
considered as to whethar the passing of  i <\/p>\n
decree should be ccmsidered as a;\u00bbAc0i1\u00a2i1;;.Si{;f1i’A’;>f_ <\/p>\n
‘x:ermi11atiI1g the entire procc\u00e9edings So\ufb01a: to     ,<\/p>\n
interim order has merged with  oiitqiinie.\n<\/p>\n
6. Having no\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9ii. the:  thatiii aiises for
\ndecision making in this pe\ufb01moiiithe  cited by the<\/p>\n
learned Cauns\u00e9ii r\u00a7t:e\u00a7is.v:L:ofisidei*;atiGf1’mg’ the outset. The<\/p>\n
decisioniivirz__iii%3}’f’v\u00a3:g\u00a7\u20acof AND OTHERS “VS-<\/p>\n
S}\u00a7ARNAPA.P2%~iANi3iV  (Am 1968 MYSORE 283)<\/p>\n
_ cited ” the  s\u00e9nior counsel would Ia}? dawn the<\/p>\n
  interim Qrdar passed by the High Court<\/p>\n
 of the revisieii petitian wauld not<\/p>\n
 V -Qpersiiie aii\ufb01\u00e9r’ “f\u00a3:11e disposal of the revisian petition and the<\/p>\n
 ”   have Iii} jurisdietion ta enforcc the interim<\/p>\n
  j\ufb01agsed by time High Court after revision petition was<\/p>\n
  of. in the decisien in the case of RAEVIESH<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
‘N<\/p>\n
AKRE AND OTHERS -Vs–~ SMT. MANGALABAI<\/p>\n
AKRE AND OTHERS (Am 2002 BOMBAY 4s’2f)L_,; isgseeeheigee  <\/p>\n
that the order of temporary i11juI1cti\u20aci:\u00a31″pz3;sL3ed “fa_veur of;<\/p>\n
the defendant in the suit is ;10’\u00a3 ‘e>iee.utabieA <\/p>\n
plai\ufb01ti\ufb01’ has got the suit itseif diepeeed ofevqefithout ‘V<\/p>\n
prosecuting the same. A_the_<"f'1ret—  abeve eases, the
\norder is ax: interim orcief passed: revision petition<\/p>\n
before the Hig3;*'1 Q:\u00a7311It  " 'irz\ufb01ihe nature of 31}<\/p>\n
er\u00e9er for W'i'i11\u00a7I'i\u00a7aax?\u00a7ifA1g fh.e"~amd't\ufb011\u20ac"and taking possession
\nof the prefeerty' \u00a5:as…"azj1 erder ta eperaie during the<\/p>\n
pendeney efihe \u00a7eViei\u00a7ii'i\u00a7etiii0;1 and as such, the said<\/p>\n
'V"e{f<3e;-3: nee xbe""a\u00a5a\ufb01ab}e after the dispesal of the<\/p>\n
'1*'e3zis:-:61:  "i:se\u00a7f. In the secend of the above eases,<\/p>\n
'   in 3;  Vef' plainti\ufb02" both the piainti\ufb01" as well as the<\/p>\n
~ 3-V'a___\u00a7eife:1dai11;_A&i1ad \ufb01led separate applieatiens seeking order <21'<\/p>\n
VA   injunction pending disposal of the suit The<\/p>\n
 '11' epgziiieatien of the plainti\ufb02" was rejeeteci while the prayer<\/p>\n
  "frga\u00e9e by the defendant gees ganted. The grant. of<\/p>\n
I'<\/p>\n
at<\/p>\n
injunctien though was for putting the defe:;\u00a7_i$_I\ufb01:'44L:4'\u00ab V.<\/p>\n
pGSS\u20acSSi0I1 of the propexty and to <\/p>\n
interference was in 9. suit where the;  Of ?'F"?3$ <\/p>\n
such that the passing of t11eV.j1;KdgIIi\u20acIj;.f'~-w0u}(3'.%.  <\/p>\n
entire dispersal of tha suit,   tf1f:VVi3V;bove
\ntwo cases with regard    \u00a33181 thfi'
\ninterlocutory erders    cf the mam
\nproceedings   order and the
\nSame w0q}giV::*1Qi:~  e \u00a7;;\u00e9\u00a2uti0:,1 subsezquently,
\nsince   :9 the rights of the parties<\/p>\n
wauld be a\u20ac9ai\u00a7a%31\u00e9V' :'1\u00a7r4i'1",_lit\u00bbs:: Zdisposal of the main matter is a<\/p>\n
 '.s:0nc1iis:1c{\u00a7;' p\u00a7;siti\u20ac5:':\u00aba:_3_,dthere can be 11:3: \u00e9ispxzte abaui the<\/p>\n
 _   <\/p>\n
  E.-Rriwaver, the quesijon that raquires 1:0 be<\/p>\n
   \ufb01\u00e9dresseci is; Wh\ufb01th\ufb01f the pasition Weuld be<\/p>\n
 ___"'7'diffar\u00e9n{ if such imterlacutmy order is \u00a7as:;ed in a<\/p>\n
 ".V.}:2V\u00a7:o\u20ac:eedi:1g$ ix; which the \ufb01assmg at' a preiiminargi \u00e9acrae<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
VF<\/p>\n
and thereafter a \ufb01nal decree is eontempiated uI1derf',_<\/p>\n
code and in such circumstm1ee, whether the  'Cf "<\/p>\n
the prelimizaaxy decree could be e0I1:3itie'1*edA_    2<\/p>\n
of the suit and would it alone wipe  of <\/p>\n
interlecutoxy order and also xvieemer tIie'12at1:fe,\u00bb iii' the
\ni11te1'}oe12t0:y erder  erdtiie isssue
\nand in such circumstances whether e=11e'}ij;}1_f{ler could still<\/p>\n
be executed 'P  <\/p>\n
8.  4.   learned sexlior counsel<\/p>\n
placed relianee en .t11eA’deei\u00bbeion in the ease ef VENKATA<\/p>\n
A-i’VRee&m?’:’A3>:\u00a7> “QTHE\u00a7RS”’49vs~ PETHI REDBY {AIR 1963 SC<\/p>\n
\u00a7’9–“2)’ _t_eu  the preliminary decree for partition is<\/p>\n
  “\ufb01nal   The decision in the ease of MQOLGHANI}<\/p>\n
” Axe weeks –vs– DEPUTY DIRECFGR, CONSOLIDATION<\/p>\n
  {(1995} 5 SCC 531) is relied en te eentend<\/p>\n
 {hat} the preliminary decree weuld in feet declare or<\/p>\n
  \u00e9iete\ufb01nizze the rights in the property anti the \ufb01nial decree is<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
1.}.\n<\/p>\n
10. 011 analysis ef the above cited decisions, it is<\/p>\n
Seen that in the case ef VENKATA REDDY AND o’:’;:’-:}\u00a7:-Rs?<\/p>\n
the Ho\ufb01ble Supreme Court was censider\u00e9ng  .<\/p>\n
and effect of 2: preliminary decree in the,_bae}~;@*6t\ufb01f3j:d.’Ve\u00a3F we   ” ”<\/p>\n
provision centaitled in Sec\ufb01on 28 ‘~\u00a21′–X  t\ufb01e. “i”’19oxzi1i’c;i,gi1?}:<\/p>\n
Insoivency Act, 1920, which st\u00a3iteti..}\\?itki’<\/p>\n
decision by a eempetent. CQ11rf:’fits”-._e0ntai1<1r:d  first
\npreviso to the said sectioii'. '   it is held that
\na decision is 'be ss  as the Court<\/p>\n
rende3:*ing":.it i–:s'e0iier:fIf{\u00a7;er},' urialterable except by resort<\/p>\n
to such p3re'vi$ione" r\u00a7;%e%  '(fade sf Civii Precedure fer<\/p>\n
–v1ieversa};,. vns:edi\ufb01eai;iQ:__}____r;r amendment. It is in the<\/p>\n
V’\u00a7;;~;:1<:kg3"\u00ab:::und'~0f..the_1'e:qL1i:"ement of the said enactment even<\/p>\n
   3, pr\u00a3:1ii::\u00a7I1a:';a%"'ej\u00a7}.e\u20ac:i'ee is held: te be a, fmal deeisien.<\/p>\n
L"   53;": the case 9\u00a7 MOOLCHAND we OTHERS, the<\/p>\n
 ..__ E%ezi\u00a7b1e Supreme Ceurt was eoneide\ufb01ng the effect ef a<\/p>\n
 A..__4 \u00a7;re1i:11ina.I'y decree in the Eight; ef the pmvision centaizied<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
.;-….\n<\/p>\n
gt<\/p>\n
in Sectjen. 5(2) of the U.P. Zameendari Abolition <\/p>\n
Reforms Act, 1950. In that (:irc1u11st2a13,c.;\u00a2\u00bb,’V:”‘-:;g:h’\u00e9ii:’ T1′-\u00a57\u00a3i(b”3′   \u00bb <\/p>\n
required for the said pravisian ts C\u00a7O3\u00a3I1fij’:A i1}_tC3__<\/p>\n
declaration or deter::{1i11a\ufb010n_<;4_f"     .<\/p>\n
.af  View
\nthat once a preiimi;1a1″y’\u00a3i\u00a7,\u00e9Vcr\u00a2e-?_V: \ufb01fogreedmgs
\nso far as deciaratign of ;fig1fit$.,  the ianci are
\nconcerned com\u00e9iv    are to be
\nvm\u00a7’}s:\u20ac:d     1? further held that
\nfor the .. 5 “{2} of the said Act the<\/p>\n
pendezacy of “fi}f;1a}_d\u00e9c_15\u00e9\u00e9 pfofszeeditxgs carmot be censidere\u00e9<\/p>\n
3.23 p<:11.:i:i.Iig' ;.'::inCeV t1*;*\u00a7 _I__'_E_ghts am already determined. But in<\/p>\n
"me saga  \u00a7\u00a3S\u20ac21f, the Ir~Eon'bIe: Supreme Court was<\/p>\n
':ia.'x:i1:zg'*-"r.*\u00a30t\u00a7:' 3535 E16 dafmi\ufb01on of "(}\u20ac{3I'\u20ac\u20ac" 3.3 mntained in<\/p>\n
 Section" 133(2)', read with the provisions cantained in Ordar<\/p>\n
 4%%2%r:v%1\u00e9;:1e\u00a2\u00ab18{2; and aim Qr\u00e9er 26 Rule 14 of the (mg. has<\/p>\n
 '  __ :{'\u00a7E31{ i  ;a S 'Afellovg-*3:\n<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
“j
\n.-\n<\/p>\n
“35, The de\ufb01nition of “decree” contained <\/p>\n
Section 2(2) read with the provisions contained
\nOrder 20 Rule 18(2) as also Order 25 Rule:—14:g,?f’*  ‘<\/p>\n
the Code indicate that a prelimgiftary decree\u00bb.  <\/p>\n
first to be passed in a
\nthereafter (I \ufb01nal decree is passed fo.2}f_’v_eAe;t::I’,1t::zZ*:.4  ‘<\/p>\n
separation of shares irz~..,4a’~’\u00a90rd’\u00e91nee
\nproceedings held Lgnder  25, ..’Y*I1ezfeVf1re,
\nthus, two stages iii’-..\u00a2.;ij%\u00ab–s:.\u00a2ii:   The first
\nstage is reached when7  is
\npassed undef ezhicizfe  _ef  parties in<\/p>\n
the .~  :   ” “are: determined and
\ndeefgxreci.  is the stage when 5:\n<\/p>\n
final ‘decree gaege which concludes the
\nlzyreawedi\ufb01qsyv befofe  court and the suit is
\n  h\u00a2u:it)e”–eerrte to an end fee” all praciwlrral<\/p>\n
(ezxzg\ufb01zasis suppiied}<\/p>\n
 12.” tilt} ‘feet that ie the very same View expressed by<\/p>\n
 \u00a7.~E_\u00bb{:;’;’r:1;5;AT\u00a5:>ie Supreme Court in the eubsequezat decisien in<\/p>\n
V  “‘-‘?;l;\ufb01e___i;e.se of HASHAM ABBAS SAYYAI) relied cm by the<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
fu-\n<\/p>\n
no<\/p>\n
iearneci Counsal for the respendemts. Hence,  2<\/p>\n
such observation with regard to the ‘suit’ c:0i1.”e_iI1gV’T~td an  V’ <\/p>\n
end fer a1} practical purposes WhjB:1&’>V ‘tk1\u00a2_  <\/p>\n
passed 311$ the proceedings art: c011(:iiw,:\u20acie’:Vd is  <\/p>\n
for consideration of the facts ev\u00e9igimg
\nsince as noticed above,.  \ufb01nal \u00a3i\u20ac\u00a7CiSiV\u00a5)I1 had
\nbeen discussed by the  __( “:.c.uI’t in the
\nfacts evoivizag iI:\u00a7”t}’1\u00a7:’:VSai<i1'._c3;s\u00e9$\u00a7  effect of the<\/p>\n
preliminary  of the proviasicsns of<\/p>\n
the relevant._:=311\u00e9Ci;:r3_<\u00a7=\u00a7:1ts"~s\u00a7EI{1ig:hfv;:1s being considered in<\/p>\n
that case. But-11:1 i:hc"' \u00a7;:i;_;_'ef\u00a7\u20ac:n{ case, the conclusion of the<\/p>\n
suit' \u00a73.:\u00a7:1 ?_I,\u00a7.;1?.~',': paS3i_,1ig ef the \ufb01nal decree would have 3<\/p>\n
 <:?_iffe:"~3m d i:*:;eI:7s\u00a7V9n while considering the iZ{1t\u20acI'-it-"i\ufb01 right of<\/p>\n
 \u00a7;*\u00e9ift\u00a7e\u00e9  the preliminary decrees, the parties are<\/p>\n
 iaajaid  "ice-owners being antitied ta a share in the<\/p>\n
  11116 uitinaaie fallen: of the Same is 'ta be<\/p>\n
K  cta1:{si\ufb02e':4ed hased an \u00a3136 nature of the intarlacutery order<\/p>\n
  '  "[35 passed. It woul\u00e9 31% be useful to refer :0 the 'Vi{3'W<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
expreased by ‘(he Privy Councii in the case of <\/p>\n
ROY ANE) 0’1’ HEIRS VS. PARAMESWAR  ‘<\/p>\n
OTHERS (Am 1943 PC 11) m*herein:i\u20ac”is–~helei  <\/p>\n
“A aartition suit in which L3  ;3r\u00a5;e}irr1imi1–<s; _ "  T<\/p>\n
dacree has been passed Vstillv-a
\n\u00a7__u__;3; and the rights of :1z\u00a2};\u00a7a;~::es L  are
\nadded after the   have t\u00a7V;\u00a7"\u00a5:1r\u00a7
\nadjusted at the timef\ufb01".\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
13.’.  Th\u00e9if\u00e9i.'(}r\u00a2;”xL7i1\u00e9ft-gganjbe deduced is that in all<\/p>\n
Suits af tlie. L\ufb01aturti ii\ufb01hef\u00e9—_f)af.$Si:1g of 01113′ one decree is<\/p>\n
_VVpr0vid\u00a7\u00a7d’u:3d\u20acr  Cede, the saif. would come :0 an and<\/p>\n
 .\u00a73I\u00a7 ma cf ‘E116 decree. In that circtgmstance, all<\/p>\n
i:3:tc1fi{::c1iiio;f;%v\u00bb._Q1;\u00a7iC\u00e9fs passed durirzg the pxsndency of the<\/p>\n
suit z;s}’:31;11{:i.J rderge with the dscree and woz\ufb02d not have<\/p>\n
 V’ \u00a711d\u00e9}3\u20ac:_;1&\u00e9\ufb01t existence 36 as ta: seek for execuiisn since<\/p>\n
 ‘–\u00abi:h:t\u00a7’\u00a7{\u00a7\u20ac5\u20ac\u00a7r\u20ac\u20ac in itssif wauici became executabie. Haw\ufb01ver,<\/p>\n
” suits in which the passing sf two decrees nameiy,<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
‘-o
\nI’<\/p>\n
prelirnirzary and fmai is provided for under the Code5T’V\u20acven<\/p>\n
if the preliminary decree is passed, in law,  <\/p>\n
not conciude until the \ufb01nal decree which is..t%:,>\u00a7\u00a2:c1:t%;v;E:s1e is”  <\/p>\n
passed, though the right 0f the  g\u00e9ts ‘<\/p>\n
determined by the 1:Jr\u20ac1imina1jy.4_decft–::: ‘* E\u00a7.*\u00e9’:;.  Size}; <\/p>\n
cases, in general though the iIit\u00aba3fio:::.1td\u20ac, in such \ufb01vem, it wm\ufb02d remain in<\/p>\n
f<31*cT\u20ac*Ae'v5:311 afiigzr\ufb02ie pagsing of the preiiminary \u00e9ecree arid<\/p>\n
 ' d\ufb01iil '$62.. \u00e91:.j.t <.\u00a7():1ciud,es by way of \ufb01nal clacm\u00e9.<\/p>\n
  In ardar ta deiermizxe undar which of the. above<\/p>\n
  '  " *{:1f: a:iS \u00a7, ma i3"1\u00a7\u20ac";I'}8r{:t}?:GIjf 0111?' wauid fall, the purperi ef the<\/p>\n
Grdezr should be rzaticed in Each case in the backgaund of<\/p>\n
the nature cf litigation. In this regard, distinctior:*'5s':1*1\u00a7ii;;1i}iiv,A4<\/p>\n
alse ba made batxveen an interkxcutsry order': 'which{ 'T "<\/p>\n
grzanted merely to preserve the stat1:sAA'\u00a3\u00a3?hig1\u00a7;e:g\u00a7Si;sf;31\u00a7'tlf;e — <\/p>\n
date of the grant of interizn Omar   sf <\/p>\n
suit as against an interlwutoxjs'-vL.\u00a7fder i\ufb01osi\ufb01v\u00e9iyf
\nchange of the status em'.-$'i.i;1g 033  \ufb01ate 0f' {I16  of
\ninterim order to a status  e_:ae:j:S1 \u00a2d  fan any date
\nanterior to '\u00a3116; dat\u00e9'p:':'  pas \u00a7ir1g\u00e9Tdfi.'Lh_\u00e9H_:\u20ac5rder and if such
\nanterior Status if have a bearing on the<\/p>\n
acme} e:1tit1\u00e9m\u00e9z1tVVby. 'xa%ay:':';.;f \ufb01nal decree as yer the right<\/p>\n
~':1\u00a7=:te1::1i':1\u00a2d' :mdef"t3%1\u00a7:____\u00a7;"\u20ac1i1ni:1aI3? decree. This is II1OI'\u20ac<\/p>\n
'$9' i.,I i they \u00a3:}f.__a suit far partition 'W'h$I'\u20ac the extent of<\/p>\n
   right.  t}i\u00e9'.V-Eg\ufb01ii\u00e9vable properiy is declared in terms {if<\/p>\n
Oilfder   38(2) and the actual divisisn which takes<\/p>\n
  terrns sf Order 26 R1116 14 0f the Cede. in this<\/p>\n
 ..__ f5eg\u00e9t'd, the law is weli Settied that while effecting parti\ufb01en<\/p>\n
 _ }E3r the purpas\ufb01 of final {i\u20acf;':{":I'\u20ac\u20ac, the Court weuid be<\/p>\n
i\u00bb<\/p>\n
\u00a2–\n<\/p>\n
E8<\/p>\n
justified in awarding nlonetaxy Compensatian ‘<\/p>\n
physical division of the pmperty where 3. partifgibny  ”<\/p>\n
bi? made witiiout destroying the Vi11″1′;1*i\u00ab:1siC_4′  V  2<\/p>\n
propcirty 03:’ Where it would not be\u00b0;:\u00a7>1ix:\u00e9r1ie19it.,Aie.Vd.iS’t\ufb01;f1\u00a7*<\/p>\n
the exciusive p()SS\u20acSSiOI1 of 01.36:’ ba\u00e9es,
\nit wouid be material as \u00a7;e:.:~,\u00a7h<\u20ac  b\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9i\ufb02gygand as
\nto which of the <:0~\u00bb$harer  if;  the (iata of
\nthe passing 03$'   situation, the<\/p>\n
pasitive i:1tse1*i\ufb01<";'\u00a3:{it;:\u00a7ij;}'–~._ ofdiggz\ufb01  are mandatory in<\/p>\n
nature ti::_ Itestgr\u00e9.  '\u00a7i'11iCh existed sariier to<\/p>\n
passing of th\ufb01 "OIv'\u20aciV\u20ac:E'_  aiready put. into execution<\/p>\n
_..\u00a7Qef(::r\u20ac,.  Lpas$if1g–..\u00a7\u00a7f_  prelixninary \u00e9ecree, but had not<\/p>\n
"yet \u00a323513: , vA\u20ac:\u00a7<t::;ii1te_d should be heid to continue tili the<\/p>\n
pas:3ii":g'0f \ufb02it: ma: decree as otharwise it wouid amount<\/p>\n
3:9 tr~a{r\u00e9:fS'i1jy.'\u00e9sf justice and Wank} ammmt to awarding<\/p>\n
 V' \u00a7i;r\u00bbs:5::ziu_m to a person who may continua to disobey the<\/p>\n
 '-\u00e9rdtsr 311$ evade $Xe$'Lii:i\u00a2:}I1\\%til1 the passing of praiiminar\ufb01y<\/p>\n
decree and take advantage of the final decree by his own<\/p>\n
default.\n<\/p>\n
15. In this backdrop, the facts of  ease’  ‘ <\/p>\n
would disclose that the suit; is far, P8If\ufb01iLf},0:1_  <\/p>\n
plaintiff i.e., the petitioner }r1erein “‘:\u00ab:=;u@t   ‘ $113196 <\/p>\n
Centending mat the properties  preiper\ufb01es.
\nThough the {lefexlda\ufb02ts ,’ t:\u00a7j1e;’-_\u00a3’esp@.f1tients herein had
\ndisputed ‘C316 claim,    p1*e]j111j}j1ar}2<\/p>\n
decree eiateai’ ‘;E;1a8″ held that the petitioner<\/p>\n
herein is exiiiifgleci f,\u00a7i;_ sine”  ehare in suit eehedule ‘A’<\/p>\n
..–‘a_I1<.i  pi'operties~..  _____ __'E'he respendenis herein have :10<\/p>\n
V"dez;:}\ufb01'E:.. '?$i"appea1 in R.F'.A'No.992f2009 and the<\/p>\n
  pre1*I::{:1'\u00a7;:ia13? *.%iee:*ee is stajgred. E\u00e9etwithstaliding the same,<\/p>\n
 _ exgen   . }i}et;iiie11e1:*':3 determined right it} one fcmrth<\/p>\n
  "if: the preperty is kept in view, the pu.rpor'{: of the<\/p>\n
 .___"'i:"1te:'1<}cut0ry nzandatory irijurletierz Qrdered in the inetani<\/p>\n
 ease requires to be neticeg. By the iE1\u00a7\u20acI"l8C{3}.7{}I'y er\ufb01er<\/p>\n
nu.\n<\/p>\n
dated 01.10.2008 in M.P’.A.No.8{}’?1\/2008 ((3\u00a71I&3’H{_:%};V’:’;{‘:\u00a5535i.. S'< K<\/p>\n
Court with reference t0 materials an record haS"'I:@C::ir\u00e9\u00e9d a <\/p>\n
\ufb01nding that the petitioner herein was \ufb01ijt ;iv:i'po'ss\u00a2ussiQi*1'i:;f <\/p>\n
the suit 'A' SCh\u20acdi_l1\u20ac property \u00a7}I_'iOI"'  \u00e9is <\/p>\n
$21ch the ad-im:erim order of 'ij\u00e9\u00e9iidatofj\/.V. far
\nremoval 01' petitioner  ante as
\nexisted prior :0   igfige said order
\nhas attained   execu\ufb01on ta
\ntake pessessiiczn.    ziuesticn which 13 a
\nheuse   the p\ufb01titioner has<\/p>\n
succeeded  evad3ng.'A"t?r1:\u00e9:"~-\u00e9xecution by setting up an<\/p>\n
_(V}bjfZ{3t"(I}_\u00a7("' who e\u00a7}S<3._V_Vif\u00e9;'iledV:L, caxmet new take aclvantage of<\/p>\n
V.   {hat 3 prelixninary dearm: has bean pass\u00e9d<\/p>\n
th\u00a7\u00e91~.:3:\u00e9if\u00a3eIi'~ _ principle: detem\ufb01in\u00e9d above is natiaad,<\/p>\n
V the e\u00a7\u00e9L::ui;i \u20ac:\u00a7\ufb02' \ufb01z' Qtherwis\ufb01 9f the xxatura of intarlocutory<\/p>\n
  i\ufb01junctian gfanied in {ha instant sass weuid<\/p>\n
3  -Zfiaxgeg  fjearing on tha iinai decrzee. The petitioner thssugh<\/p>\n
 '  " h\u00e9lci exatitlad :9 (me feurthgshare, the athar Ci\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01daiiii\ufb01<\/p>\n
put together are entitled ':10 three fourth share and the<\/p>\n
ciefencs taken does 1101; indicate csn\ufb02ict of <\/p>\n
amongst the \u00e9efendants themselves and in   _<\/p>\n
respondenis herein together are elfijgitled   "  <\/p>\n
Since the propsrty in question is  re}si\u00e9:iie3:'it.is41.'.'<\/p>\n
the real issue would arise whe11 L3f.1s pfocsd1;re~
\nRuie 14 of the Code csmes    the
\ninstant Case is one s11V(:':1..V:"c::~3.se:h'   'status which
\n(existed on an antsfior def:\u20acs"i",.0:"\u00a7",.\u00a5i.<\u00e9  iI1teriocu\u00a5:ery<\/p>\n
order shsuld _f1']\u20ac\u00a7 date on which the final<\/p>\n
aiscree would V1:IisdE:A.  \u00bb–  such, the interlocutory' erder<\/p>\n
I in '\u00a3116.. \u00abiiisstsnt c\u00a3ise. <:sn1f\u00a7.ot be held is have merged in the<\/p>\n
"}}rc{iir3,i:1a:y\u00ab.M\u00e9;ejCrss and the sxscuting Court Wsuld be<\/p>\n
 V justiiissi   f;:s{:i\u00e9s.diI1g with the matter. The impugned<\/p>\n
 ' Grder tfzsfefors does not call for iI'1t\u20acI'if\u20acF\u20acI}.C\u20ac.<\/p>\n
'   in the result, the fs}1swing:\n<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
T
\n.-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.?\n<\/p>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
i) The Civil Revision Petitisn is dismissfrd.<\/p>\n
ii) The petitioner is however granted  ~ <\/p>\n
15.11.2669 to volugatarily vacate   T’<\/p>\n
the executing Court,   <\/p>\n
waxrant Shall be executeii.\n<\/p>\n
 Parties 1:9 bear their ow”-‘\ufb01 ‘c9sts;. ‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH 005123′ 01:’ KARNATAKA AT _ DATED TE-HS THE 6TH DAY oF_NoVEMm;RT200\u00a7P;2_ Arm SR: (LA. KREEEHNAPPA, ADVS.) ‘ ‘:’\u00a7._N }l’_._:C’ “”” A \u00a3,I:+1;R4:’:;\u20ac;\u00a7*g”r>:aT1L S\/Q SR1 SHIVANAGQUDA PATEL ._ “‘__P.\u00a3’3ED7<\u00a7\u00a7.BOi5'T 32 YEARS A ' Rza NG;j_1.IE6, 4'"! FLOOR, ""3R\ufb01..__NiA\u00a5\u00a7\u20ac, 2% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":3041,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009"},"wordCount":3041,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009","name":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-23T03:57:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-somashekar-d-patil-vs-shri-d-s-patil-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri.Somashekar D Patil vs Shri.D.S.Patil on 6 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}