{"id":99501,"date":"2010-10-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2"},"modified":"2015-08-28T17:36:45","modified_gmt":"2015-08-28T12:06:45","slug":"mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                             CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                                 Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                               Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                      Tel: +91-11-26161796\n                                                              Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001945\/9123Adjunct\n                                                                            Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001945\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal<\/p>\n<p>Appellant                              :       Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma<br \/>\n                                               C\/o Anil Kumar Sharma,<br \/>\n                                               Type &#8211; II\/42, North West Moti Bagh,<br \/>\n                                               New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Respondent                             :       Mr. Vijay Kumar\n                                               Public Information Officer &amp; Assistant Registrar\n                                               Government of NCT of Delhi\n                                               Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies\n                                               Old Court's Building, Parliament Street,\n                                               New Delhi 110001.\n\nRTI application filed on               :       12\/03\/2010\nPIO replied                            :       Not replied\nFirst appeal filed on                  :       16\/04\/2010\nFirst Appellate Authority order        :       07\/05\/2010\nSecond Appeal received on              :       12\/07\/2010\n\nInformation Sought\nThe Appellant sought information regarding -\n<\/pre>\n<p>    \u2022 How many times the RCS office has given extensions to Shri Udai Baxi as Administrator of the Quetta Coop<br \/>\n       Group Housing Society Ltd. Kindly provide the information along with documentary proof i.e. (orders issued<br \/>\n       by RCS upto 31\/03\/2010)<br \/>\n    \u2022 A copy of the Amendment Act 37 of the Delhi Coop Societies Act, 2003 may kindly be provided relating to<br \/>\n       extension for appointment of administrator in the Society by RCS office beyond three hundred sixty five days<br \/>\n       as per Act and other related information in this subject:\n<\/p>\n<p>         a)    If there is no Amendment on the aforesaid Act of the societies, RCS office may clarify the maximum<br \/>\n     period for appointment of Shri Udai Baxi us Administrator has completed three hundred and sixty five days as<br \/>\n     per Act of the Delhi Coop Societies 2003.\n<\/p>\n<p>    \u2022 The RCS office may supply a copy of the sub committee constitute by the Administrator with the approval of<br \/>\n       the Registrar under Rule 61 of the Delhi Coop Societies Rules,2007 in the Quetta Coop Group Housing Society<br \/>\n       Ltd (Regn No.1255) after his appointment as Administrator.\n<\/p>\n<p>    \u2022 The RCS Office may supply a certify copy of the Managing Committee minutes in which Managing Committee<br \/>\n       approved to issue a letter dated 20-04-2009. the Quetta Group Housing Society (copy enclosed) and also clarify<br \/>\n       the minutes of the Managing Committee has been conducted by the administrator under Rule 60 of the Delhi<br \/>\n       Coop Societies Rules 2007<\/p>\n<p>Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO)<br \/>\nNo Reply was given.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n<\/p>\n<p>The FAA directed The SPIO to provide the requisite information as per record available to the appellant within 40 days<br \/>\nfor Point No. 1 &amp; 2.\n<\/p>\n<p>SPIO is further directed to provide the information regarding Point 3 &amp; 4 to the appellant within next 15 days, after<br \/>\ngetting this information from Administrator<br \/>\n Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing held on August 30, 2010:<br \/>\nThe following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. M. M. Mondal UDC on behalf of Mr. Vijay Kumar, Public Information Officer &amp;<br \/>\nAssistant Registrar;\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8220;The appellant is trying to highlight the fact that RCS appears to be illegally allowing an Administrator to<br \/>\ncontinue at QUETTA CGHS Ltd. The PIO has given some information on 14\/05\/2010 which the appellant claims was<br \/>\nsent to him only on 13\/07\/2010. The respondent has brought no proof to show that the information was sent before<br \/>\n13\/07\/2010. As per the information provided it appears that Mr. Uday Bakshi has been appointed as Administrator on<br \/>\n14\/01\/2009 for a period of 90 days. The respondent admits that Mr. Uday Bakshi continued as Administrator since then<br \/>\nand states that there is no extension or notification for his continuance for this entire period. The PIO will give this in<br \/>\nwriting to the appellant and also photocopies of any papers by which any proposal to extend the services of Mr. Uday<br \/>\nBakshi are being processed.\n<\/p>\n<p>In response to query-3 RCS has given members of a sub-committee whereas the Administrator Mr. Uday Bakshi has<br \/>\ninformed the appellant that no sub-committee has been formed. Thus it appears that the PIO has given false<br \/>\ninformation. The PIO will explain why this false information was given to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>In response to query-4 minutes of the managing committee has been sent which are not attested by the Administrator<br \/>\nand the PIO. The PIO and administrator are directed to attest these and send it to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>The respondent states that the persons responsible for giving information late are Mr. Ved Prakash and Mr. Ashok<br \/>\nSharma who were then PIOs. The respondent states that he submitted the information on 08\/04\/2010.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision dated August 30, 2010:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal was allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      &#8220;The PIO is directed to give the information as directed above to the appellant before 20<br \/>\nSeptember 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the then PIOs Mr.<br \/>\nVed Prakash and Mr. Ashok Sharma within 30 days as required by the law.<br \/>\nFrom the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the then PIOs are guilty of not furnishing information within<br \/>\nthe time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI<br \/>\nAct. It appears that the then PIOs actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is being<br \/>\nissued to them, and they are directed give their reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty should not be<br \/>\nlevied on them.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Ved Prakash and Mr. Ashok Sharma will present themselves before the Commission at the above address on 08<br \/>\nOctober 2010 at 10.30am alongwith their written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on<br \/>\nthem as mandated under Section 20 (1). They will also submit proof of having given the information to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>If there are other persons responsible for the delay in providing the information to the Appellant the PIO is directed<br \/>\nto inform such persons of the show cause hearing and direct them to appear before the Commission with him.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant facts emerging at the show cause hearing held on October 8, 2010:<br \/>\nThe following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mr. A. K. Sharma;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. A. K. Sharma, the then PIO\/AR, RCS and Mr. Ved Prakash, the then PIO\/AR, RCS.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Respondents stated that the RTI application dated 12\/03\/2010 was received in the office of PIO\/AR, RCS<br \/>\non 15\/03\/2010. Mr. Ved Prakash submitted that a reply was prepared on 08\/04\/2010. However, the said reply<br \/>\nwas not sent to the Appellant. Mr. Prakash stated that the reply dated 08\/04\/2010 was not sent due to oversight<br \/>\nof his staff, which has been found to be recurring in nature. Mr. A. K. Sharma stated that further to the order of<br \/>\nthe FAA dated 07\/05\/2010, information in relation to all the queries were sent vide letter dated 14\/05\/2010. The<br \/>\nCommission also noted that information in relation to all the queries was once again sent to the Appellant vide<br \/>\n letter dated 13\/07\/2010, which also enclosed letter dated 14\/05\/2010. The Commission is satisfied with the<br \/>\nsubmissions of the Respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>Further, based on the submissions of the Appellant and the information provided by Mr. Vijay Kumar, PIO\/AC,<br \/>\nRCS (NW) vide letter dated 28\/09\/2010, it appears that complete information, as directed by the Commission,<br \/>\nhas not been provided. The Commission noted that in response to query 3 of the RTI application, the RCS has<br \/>\ngiven members of a sub-committee whereas Mr. Uday Bakshi, Administrator has informed the Appellant that no<br \/>\nsub- committee has been formed. The Commission, by its order dated 30\/08\/2010 directed the PIO\/AC to<br \/>\nexplain why this false information was given to the Appellant. However, the PIO\/AC has not clarified the same.<br \/>\nTherefore, the PIO\/AC is directed to clarify and explain to the Appellant why false information, as described<br \/>\nabove, was given to him.\n<\/p>\n<p>Adjunct Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Commission hereby directs Mr. Vijay Kumar, PIO\/AC, RCS (NW) to explain to the Appellant why false<br \/>\ninformation, as described above, was given to him, before October 28, 2010 with a copy to the Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Commission has further observed that Mr. Vijay Kumar, PIO\/AC, RCS (NW) has failed to comply with the<br \/>\norder of the Commission dated 30\/08\/2010. Therefore, Mr. Vijay Kumar, PIO\/AC is directed to appear before<br \/>\nthe Commission on November 26, 2010 at 4:30 pm along with his written submissions to show cause why<br \/>\npenalty should not be imposed on him under Section 20 of the RTI Act. He is directed to produce before the<br \/>\nCommission any relevant documents including documentary evidence that he may have relied on in his written<br \/>\nsubmissions. If there are other persons responsible for not complying with the provisions of the RTI Act and the<br \/>\nCommission&#8217;s order who have not been included in this show cause notice, Mr. Vijay Kumar, PIO\/AC is<br \/>\ndirected to serve this show cause to them and direct them to appear before the Commission on 26\/11\/2010 along<br \/>\nwith him.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                                            Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                                                  Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                                             October 8, 2010<\/p>\n<p>(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(YM)\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001945\/9123Adjunct Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001945 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma C\/o Anil Kumar Sharma, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1383,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2"},"wordCount":1383,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2","name":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-28T12:06:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-kumar-sharma-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-8-october-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Avinash Kumar Sharma vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99501\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}