{"id":99767,"date":"2009-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-23T05:24:51","modified_gmt":"2017-07-22T23:54:51","slug":"smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANQAIVA'\nDATED THIS THE gm DAY OF' N'OvEMBE:\u00a7r('2oo9._    _\n\nPRESENT:\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJH-:3'1\"IO--EN.--';i.1\u00e9AT1~L'   \n\nAND'-..\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUsT1O_E K.N.KESHA\\ZA\u00a3'J_AIRAYANAI I\n\nM.F.A.NO.1'56I1V-I\/ 2OOE..{1vIv) \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nSMT.M.N.PANKAJAKE;JHIA  _ I\nw\/O LATE M.K.RANGA  \nHINDU, AGED 51 YEEARS\n\nR.        \nS\/O LATE  RAO _  '\nH1NDU,.V.AGE'D 26 YEARS \" \n\n. I\u00a5.II4AI1I\"'1;iP'}.'g\u00e9-:x'.,D.ELV{;Io']TI'\n\nW7\/O    ' \nD \/O LATE 'M.K.RANf\u00a7_rA\u00abRAO\nHINDI}, AOED 28 YEARS\n\nALQL ARE RESIDING AT No.9.\n1-1_F~LO.OR, I cRO'sE,----\u00abPOL1cE ROAD,\n\nI ~.BA\\1OALOREg 53.\n\n.. . APPELLANTS\n\nA _ -{Ey's1\u00e9:';i}c.['sATH1sH KUIVIAR, ADV.~ ABSENT]\n\nA:\u00a7:D_j, . I\n\n2.\n\nI PEHANKARA S\/O PU'I'i'ASWA}\\\/{Y\n__-'HINDU, MAJOR,\nR\/AT NO476, I MAIN, em CROSS\n\nYESHWANTHPUR.\nBANGALORE H 22.\n\nTHE BRANCH MANAGER\nUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD..\nDIVISION N010, ST. PATRICK BUILDING.\n\n\n\n3\n\nI FLOOR, MUSEUM ROAD.\nBAN GALORE M25.  RESIPONDENTS\n\n{By SRl.S.V.HEGDE MULKHAND, ADV. FOR R-2-ABSENT.\nNOTICE TO R~1 IS DISPENSED WITH.)  *\n\nTHIS MFA IS FILED U\/S.173{1} or Mv Acfr*'A\u00a33A'1'N?sjf\"'rHE\nJUDGMENT 3; AWARD DATED 21\/9\/20r;)s~ pAs.sED---e IN\n\nMVC.NO.2390\/2004 ON THE FILE or THE.sVI_I'~--.AD--.DOL.'JUDf3E;'=_\ncsc &amp; MEMBER, MAC'I'~3, METROPOLITAN AREA; \u00bbBA1\\?CxAi;\u00bbQRE'g 5\n{scene}, PARTLY ALLOWING THE c.LA_1M' PETITION FOR._ .\nCOMPENSATION &amp; SEEKING    or  ''\n\nCOMPENSATION.\n\nTHIS M.F'.A. coM1NG\"'--AA.D'1r\u00a2 FDR'---HEA_'E.1AiEll\"'THs1s DAY,\nN.K.PA'I'IL, J.. DELNERED THE FD1.L..Qw1Ne.:\u00ab _ i\n\nThis appeal is....\u00e9ire.cted:._a\u00a7ainst_=the judgment and\n\nmid tciatetii;;1l;9,\u00bb2'DE{)5At passed in lVi.V.C.No.2390\/2004\non the't..f1\u00a3e   Motor Accident Claims\n\n\"V_'&gt;I'1*\u00a7'ib1:1__OOI'1al~1Il.O \"(:'-ECHCHV-3), Bangalore ('Tribunal for brevity),\n\n' grdund that, the compensation of Rs.5.28,072\/-\n\nO' .aWarde'di'j_D\u00a7*VVthe Tribunal with interest at 6% per annum,\n\nis inadequate and requires enhancement.\n\n2. The brief facts of the case are that, the appellant\n\n No.1 is the wife and appellant Nos. 2 to 4 are the children\n\nof deceased M.K.Ranga Rae, Who was running\n\n\/I\n._____,n\"_._..\u00bb--~--\u00bb---\"\"'\"\"\"\"\"'\n\nI\nz\n6'\n\n\n\nBhuvaneshwari Correspondence College and--'jals_o.lg'duoing\n\nComputer saies and service in hardware':i'tems';a-getting'\n\nmonthly income of Rs.20,000\/gt Thatl_:',_l  atj \n\nabout 11.25 a.rn., when the  \nriding his moped near'~v..::Circlel'  ;l'emple,\nSadashivanagar,  came with\nhigh speed driven   and negligent\nmanner an'd\"dashed,_  lmoped, as a result\nof w?riicl'l.,1: sustained grievous head\n to\ufb02tlielllsame later. On account of\nthe dleath of-:l:\\:'\/:i';lK}Ranga Rao in the motor vehicle\n\nacgcidentflthle'appellants filed the claim petition claiming\n\n   17,90,000\/~ against the respondents.<\/pre>\n<p> &#8216;Tre claim petition had come up for consideration<\/p>\n<p>beforje :_i&lt;\u00a7,\u00a7s&#039; Tribunal on 219.2005.<\/p>\n<p>3. The Tribunal, after hearing the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p> on both sides and after considering the oral and<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence available on record, by the<br \/>\njudgment and award, allowed the claim petition in part<\/p>\n<p>ii<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and awarded compensation of Rs.5,28.072\/\u00ab~ with interest<br \/>\nat 6% per annum from the date of petition till thedate of<\/p>\n<p>payment. Being dissatisfied with the I  of<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribunal,  <\/p>\n<p>have presented this appeal on&#8221;the&#8217;\u00abgro_iunJd the xsaildf <\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the&#8217;.fFi&#8221;i.bunal&#8217;,_&#8211;v&#8217;r.is.<br \/>\nand requires enhanCemen&#8217;tr.:iby<br \/>\nand award of the Tri&#8217;biinal.;*i&#8221;&#8221;&#8216; &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>4. We have gon.e..thro&#8217;ugh ilhelvggrodnds urged in the<\/p>\n<p>appeal *  &#8216;Careful consideration of the<br \/>\nirnpugnedxh  award and after thorough<\/p>\n<p>evaluation of th.e&#8230;Qr~iginal records available on file, We are<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; {or the Tribunal has committed error<\/p>\n<p> income of the deceased at Rs.5,000\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p>month; without assigning any Valid reasons and without<\/p>\n<p> .Vtaki&#8217;ng into Consideration the evidence of PW.1 who has<\/p>\n<p> stated in unequivocal terms that the deceased was aged<\/p>\n<p>about 55 years and was an educationalist and<\/p>\n<p>businessman running Z\/eral institutions as referred<br \/>\n&#8216;\ufb02_M~_&#8217;_&#8221;#&#8217;_A_____M_,,._.I<\/p>\n<p>\/<br \/>\nz\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>above, getting income of Rs.20,000\/m~ per month.__ As per<\/p>\n<p>the Bank extracts of the deceased at  19,<\/p>\n<p>they show that he was getting an <\/p>\n<p>Rs.l0,000\/&#8211; per month. This.-aspect <\/p>\n<p>not been looked into nor<br \/>\nTribunal while determiningilthe  t:he&#8221;&#8216;deceasedl.<br \/>\nHaving regard to fact;s&#8221;&#8216;an_d&#8217;circumstances, we take<br \/>\nthe income of the &#8212; per month<\/p>\n<p>from all sotttces  .:&#8217;.atter&#8221;vltdeduyctling his incidental<\/p>\n<p>expenses:   the institution, payments<br \/>\ntowards &#8216;payment of salaries to the staff<\/p>\n<p>etc;,\u00bb We take the income of the deceased at Rs.6,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>  as against Rs.E&#8221;),O0O\/&#8211; per month taken by the<\/p>\n<p>it    multiplier adopted by the Tribunal is &#8216;9&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>But i&#8211;j_n&#8221;view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the<\/p>\n<p> it caseholf Sarla Verma and others Vs. Delhi Transport<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I.hCoi*poration and another reported in 2009 ACJ 1298<\/p>\n<p> {SC}. as the deceased was aged about 65 years as per the<\/p>\n<p>post mortem report, the appropriate multiplier applicable<\/p>\n<p>\/2<br \/>\n.1<br \/>\nL<\/p>\n<p>{&#8220;3<\/p>\n<p>is &#8216;7&#8217;, but we cannot apply the same to the caseon hand.<\/p>\n<p>T herefore, having regard to the age of the  on<\/p>\n<p>the date of the accident, we accept the  <\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal. Out of the  incoIr1&#8217;e.Ado_&#8217;1\u00bb&#8221;&#8216;\/ AV <\/p>\n<p>if we deduct 1\/ 3&#8221; towards v4pe rsona1&#8217;thLe<br \/>\ndeceased, the net income  to<br \/>\nTherefore, we &#8212; X 12 X 9)<br \/>\ntowards 1oss of   Rs.3,60,072\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>awarded      * <\/p>\n<p> awarded a sum of Rs.10,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>towardse\u00ab~.;hossVVV&#8217;  A&#8217;.e&#8217;st.a&#8217;te, Rs.10.000\/&#8211; towards loss of<\/p>\n<p>ciohsiortitgm, aRs..\u00a7..,.4L0,000\/\u00bb towards medical expenses and<\/p>\n<p>V   towards conve ance, nourishin food and<\/p>\n<p> Fcharges. Having regard to the facts and<\/p>\n<p>circurnstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the<\/p>\n<p> ,:s&#8217;an1e are just and reasonable and do not cail for<\/p>\n<p> interference by this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. Further the Tribunal has committed error in<br \/>\nawarding Rs.3.000\/~&#8211; towards funeral eXpenses.V_~which is<\/p>\n<p>on the lower side. Having regard to the  the<\/p>\n<p>deceased was a businessman,&amp;\/ having&#8217; n&#8217;1ulti_lfarious_V<\/p>\n<p>activities and also taking into aconsiderationltheexpenses&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>incurred, we deem it fit to awarti.V_lQs.1.C;_;&#8217;iQ0O;&#8217;&#8211;ll&#8217;towards<br \/>\ntransportation of dead bo&#8217;d.Sf&#8221;.and  llexlperises as<\/p>\n<p>against Rs . 3000 \/\u00bbw awardpealibyt:i1aT::bua&#8217;a1.&#8217;i&#8217;i<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;K. For the_ forego&#8217;i1ig reas0r1s~,  appeal is allowed<\/p>\n<p>in part.&#8217;  judgment and award dated<br \/>\n21.9.2005&#8243; paaaeatlipm.i::M.V.c.No.2390\/2004 on the file of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;M.ot_oi* Accident Claims Tribunal&#8211;iII {SCCH~<\/p>\n<p>_  is hereby modi\ufb01ed by awarding<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; aampaaaaaa of Rs.6,07_00&#8217;0\/W as against Rs.5,28,072\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>awarldedl by the Tribunal. The enhanced compensation of<\/p>\n<p> .V:l\u00a7S:\u00ab78,928\/&#8211; shall carry interest at 6% per annum from<\/p>\n<p> the date of petition till the date of deposit. The break up<\/p>\n<p>is as under:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>. Towards loss of dependency Rs.4,32,()00-00<\/p>\n<p>. Towards loss of consortium Rs. 10,000-00<\/p>\n<p>. Towards loss of estate Rs. 10,000~OO<\/p>\n<p>. Towards medical expenses Rs.1,4\u00bb0,00&#8217;O.+OO<\/p>\n<p>. Towards conveyance, nourishing<br \/>\nfood and attendant charges Rs, _&#8230;5,'{)OO#_{)(} K<\/p>\n<p>. Towards transportation of   ll     .\n<\/p>\n<p>dead body and funeral expenses Rs. &#8220;-.lO,:,O0O&#8211;O0&#8211;\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>U3 CJ&#8217;l:-$3-ODl0+&#8211;*<\/p>\n<p>roan t~_? Rs1i\u00a3nz5oQiQo_&#8221; A<\/p>\n<p>The second respondent?-7 inntsuraiacle_lCon&lt;{par:y is it<\/p>\n<p>directed to deposit the .e:n~h_ancedV_ cornplensation with<\/p>\n<p>accrued interest, within a_.period&quot;&#8211;~of f01i1&quot;vW\u20ac\u20acl\u00a7{S from the<\/p>\n<p>date of   of jaiidgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>  the Insurance Company, the<br \/>\nsame  -be -released in favour of the first appellant<\/p>\n<p>i17:1liI1&#8242;?i1i&amp;ie1y.ll  . _____ .. e<\/p>\n<p>  1 is directed to draw the award accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>H Sd\/w<br \/>\nEUBGE<\/p>\n<p>RS1&#8242;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANQAIVA&#8217; DATED THIS THE gm DAY OF&#8217; N&#8217;OvEMBE:\u00a7r(&#8216;2oo9._ _ PRESENT: THE HONBLE MRJH-:3&#8217;1&#8243;IO&#8211;EN.&#8211;&#8216;;i.1\u00e9AT1~L&#8217; AND&#8217;-.. THE HONBLE MR.JUsT1O_E K.N.KESHA\\ZA\u00a3&#8217;J_AIRAYANAI I M.F.A.NO.1&#8217;56I1V-I\/ 2OOE..{1vIv) BETWEEN: 1. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\\\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\\\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":828,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\\\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\\\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\\\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\\\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009"},"wordCount":828,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009","name":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K ... vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-22T23:54:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-n-pankajakshi-wo-late-m-k-vs-p-shankara-so-puttaswamy-on-9-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M N Pankajakshi W\/O Late M K &#8230; vs P Shankara S\/O Puttaswamy on 9 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99767"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99767\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}