{"id":99788,"date":"2009-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-12T14:23:43","modified_gmt":"2017-11-12T08:53:43","slug":"ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 432 of 2008()\n\n\n1. RAMACHANDRAN,AGED 66, S\/O.PAYI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. VIJAYAKUMARI, AGED 57, D\/O.PAYI, AND\n3. USHA, AGED 41, D\/O.PAYI, AND\n4. OMANA, AGED 40 YRS,W\/O.VENU,\n5. SUNIL, S\/O.VENU, PURANDEKKATTIL,  -DO-\n6. THANKAMANI, W\/O.LATE BHASKARAN,\n7. REGHU @ REGHUNATHAN, AGED 39, S\/O.LATE\n8. SUKU, AGED 30, S\/O.LATE BHASKARAN,\n9. SUDHA, AGED 34, D\/O.LATE BHASKARAN,\n10. KARTHYAYINI, AGED 57, W\/O.LATE\n11. BABU, AGED 36, MARASARI, S\/O.LATE\n12. BAIJU, AGED 33, MARASSARI, S\/O.LATE\n13. BABY, AGED 35, D\/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. JANAKI, AGED 76, W\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 56, S\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n\n3. RAJAN, GED 51, MARASSARI,\n\n4. VISWAMBARAN, AGED 55, S\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n\n5. VISALAKSHI, AGED 52, D\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n\n6. REJALEKSHMI, AGED 49, D\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n\n7. KESAVAN, AGED 76, S\/O.PARAMESWARAN,\n\n8. MALATHI, AGED 71, W\/O.LATE KUTTAN,\n\n9. MOHANAN, AGED 54, S\/O.LATE KUTTAN,\n\n10. JANARDHANAN, AGED 46, S\/O.KUTTAN,\n\n11. JAYAN, AGED 43, S\/O.LATE KUTTAN,\n\n12. SURENDRAN, AGED 40, S\/O.LATE KUTTAN,\n\n13. VALSALA, AGED 51, D\/O.LATE KUTTAN,\n\n14. SULOCHANA, AGED 71. W\/O.UNNI,\n\n15. HARIDAS, AGED 51, S\/O.UNNI,\n\n16. RETHI, AGED 48, D\/O.UNNI, PURANDEKKATTIL\n\n17. SATHI, AGED 46, D\/O.UNNI,\n\n18. JYOTHI, AGED 44, D\/O.UNNI,\n\n19. GOPI, AGED 55, S\/O.PAYI,\n\n20. BABU, AGED 53, SON OF PAYI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :DR.V.N.SANKARJEE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.SANTHOSH  (PODUVAL)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :30\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                          THOMAS P JOSEPH, J.\n                     ----------------------------------------\n                         R.S.A.No.432 of 2008B\n                     ---------------------------------------\n                Dated this 30th day of November, 2009\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>       This appeal is at the instance of defendant Nos.3, 5, 8 to 10 and<\/p>\n<p>22 to 25 and the legal representatives of defendant No.4. The appeal<\/p>\n<p>arises from a suit for partition. Trial court passed a preliminary decree<\/p>\n<p>for partition. That was challenged by these appellants and defendant<\/p>\n<p>No.4 in the Court of learned first Additional District Judge, Thrissur in<\/p>\n<p>A.S.No.76 of 2006. In the meantime as per order on I.A.No.631 of<\/p>\n<p>2006 learned Sub Judge passed final decree in the suit. First appellate<\/p>\n<p>court taking note of that development held that the appeal against the<\/p>\n<p>preliminary decree has become infractuous and accordingly dismissed<\/p>\n<p>the same.     That judgment and decree are under challenge in this<\/p>\n<p>second appeal at the instance of the parties first above mentioned.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel for appellant submit that the dismissal of the appeal<\/p>\n<p>by the first appellate court for the reason that in the meantime final<\/p>\n<p>decree has been passed is not legally correct and placed reliance on<\/p>\n<p>the decision of this court in D.RaviKumar Vs. Elizabeth Mathew<\/p>\n<p>(1994(2) KLJ 768).\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.    It is seen from I.A.Nos.2780 of 2009 and 2781 of 2009 and<\/p>\n<p>it is not disputed before me by counsel on both sides that respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.3 died on 25-12-2006 even before the first appellate court disposed<\/p>\n<p>of the appeal on 07-01-2008. While disposing of I.A.No.2780 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>and 2781 of 2009 I stated that consequent to the death of respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.3 while the appeal was pending in the first appellate court,<\/p>\n<p>impleadment of the legal representatives cannot be ordered in this<\/p>\n<p>second appeal. The reason is that the first appeal to the extent it<\/p>\n<p>concerned respondent No.3 stands abated.          The Supreme Court in<\/p>\n<p>Shahazada Bi Vs. Halimabi (AIR 2004 SC 3942) has stated that<\/p>\n<p>if the interest of co-defendants are separate, as in case of co-owners<\/p>\n<p>(as in the present case) the suit will abate only as regards the interest<\/p>\n<p>of the deceased defendant. Hence the judgment and decree of the<\/p>\n<p>first appellate court as against others cannot be said to be a nullity. At<\/p>\n<p>the same time to the extent it concerned respondent No.3, judgment<\/p>\n<p>and decree of the first appellate court are a nullity in that the judgment<\/p>\n<p>and decree were passed against a dead person. The proper course<\/p>\n<p>therefore is to allow this second appeal, set aside the judgment and<\/p>\n<p>decree of the first appellate court and remit the appeal to that Court<\/p>\n<p>with opportunity for appellants to implead legal representatives of<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.3 if they are so advised. The question whether in view<\/p>\n<p>of the passing of final decree the appeal against preliminary decree<\/p>\n<p>has become infractuous will be decided by the first appellate court at<\/p>\n<p>the appropriate time taking into account the position of law in that<\/p>\n<p>regard.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Resultantly the second appeal is allowed. Judgment and decree<\/p>\n<p>under challenge are set aside and the case is remitted to the court of<\/p>\n<p>learned First Additional District Judge, Thrissur for fresh disposal. It will<\/p>\n<p>be open to the party concerned to seek impleadment of legal<\/p>\n<p>representatives of respondent No.3 and if any such application is<\/p>\n<p>preferred learned Additional District Judge shall dispose of the same as<\/p>\n<p>provided under law and thereafter dispose of the appeal on merit. If<\/p>\n<p>any application to condone delay in filing the appeal in the first<\/p>\n<p>appellate court is pending, I make it clear that the appellate court has<\/p>\n<p>to dispose of that application before admitting the appeal for hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Execution of the final decree will stand adjourned for a period of one<\/p>\n<p>month from today or till the first appellate court passes appropriate<\/p>\n<p>orders regarding execution of the final decree, whichever is earlier.<\/p>\n<p>Parties shall appear in the first appellate court on 23-12-2009. First<\/p>\n<p>appellate court shall expedite the disposal of the applications if any<\/p>\n<p>pending as well as the appeal. No cost.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       THOMAS P JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sbna\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 432 of 2008() 1. RAMACHANDRAN,AGED 66, S\/O.PAYI, &#8230; Petitioner 2. VIJAYAKUMARI, AGED 57, D\/O.PAYI, AND 3. USHA, AGED 41, D\/O.PAYI, AND 4. OMANA, AGED 40 YRS,W\/O.VENU, 5. SUNIL, S\/O.VENU, PURANDEKKATTIL, -DO- 6. THANKAMANI, W\/O.LATE BHASKARAN, 7. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":649,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009"},"wordCount":649,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009","name":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-12T08:53:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-janaki-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramachandran vs Janaki on 30 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}