{"id":99960,"date":"2011-06-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011"},"modified":"2016-09-11T15:09:39","modified_gmt":"2016-09-11T09:39:39","slug":"mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          ENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                              Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                            Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                   Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                       Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000298\/SG\/12984\n                                                               Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000298\/SG\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<pre>Appellant:           :       Mr. Sajjan Kumar Agarwal,\n                             C-20, Sawaai Singh Highway,\n                             Bani Park, JAIPUR -16.\n\nRespondent:           :      PIO,\n                             Office of the Dy. Inspr. Gen. of Police,\n                             Central Bureau of Investigation,\n                             Anti Corruption-I, Block No. 3, 7 floor,\n                             CGO. Complex, Lodhi Raod,\n                             New Delhi --110003.\n\nRTI application:          17\/05\/2010\nPIO reply:                10\/06\/2010\nFirst appeal              12\/07\/2010\nFAA order                 30\/07\/2010\nSecond appeal             03\/11\/2010\n\nInformation sought:\n<\/pre>\n<p>FIR RC-AC3-2009 A0001 dated 12\/6\/2009 had been filed by CBI 1 ACU III on the orders of the<br \/>\nRajasthan High Court. The chargesheet was filed at the CBI Jaipur Court on 4\/2\/2010. I want the<br \/>\nfollowing information about it:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>    1. My statements had been taken during the period 18\/8\/2009 to 26\/8\/2009. I want a copy of my<br \/>\n       statements and the action taken on these. I also want to know if my statements were included in<br \/>\n       the chargesheet. If they were not included, reason for not including them.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    2. Copies of all related actions including notesheets.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    3. Action taken by CBI with respect to FIR.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    4. Action taken by CBI of encroachment on land from 30\/01\/2009 to 02\/02\/2009.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>PIO&#8217;s reply:\n<\/p>\n<p> In RC AC3 2009 A0001, your statements were recorded by the IO on various dates and the documents<br \/>\nwere also taken over from you. The statements and documents were found to be not relevant. However,<br \/>\nthese statements\/documents are part of Case Diaries which cannot be disclosed to anyone except as<br \/>\nprovided u\/s 172(3) of CRPC. The chargesheet has been filed in the court of Ld. Special Judge, Jaipur.<br \/>\nThe information asked for are relating to the aforesaid pending prosecution case and. therefore, I am<br \/>\nconvinced that disclosure of the same will impede the progress of prosecution. Hence the information is<br \/>\ndenied under Section 8(1)(h) of R TI Act, 2005.,<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for First appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Not attached.\n<\/p>\n<p>FAA order:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                              Page 1 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> I find that CPIO has replied that your statements and records submitted by you were not considered<br \/>\nrelevant for the prosecution case and hence does not constitute relied upon documents. Therefore, he has<br \/>\nargued that disclosure of such documents in any other manner except that provided u\/s. 172(3) Cr. PC<br \/>\nwould impede the prosecution of offenders. Hence denial of information u\/s. 8(1)(h) is justified.<br \/>\nDisclosure of information not relied upon by prosecution is general by section 172(3) of Cr.PC as<br \/>\nexplained above and hence it has been correctly withheld.\n<\/p>\n<p>The contentions mentioned in these paras are your own conclusions which do not fall in the category of<br \/>\nseeking any information. The CPIO has rightly withheld the information u\/s. 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, 2005<br \/>\nand I find that in his letter dated 10.06.2010, the CPIO has given detailed justification for withholding the<br \/>\ninformation.\n<\/p>\n<p>Ground for second appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>PIO is deliberately denying the information quoting exemptions. The FAA had also refused information<br \/>\nunder exemptions of Section 8(1).\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present<br \/>\nAppellant : Mr. Sajjan Kumar Agarwal;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent : Absent;\n<\/p>\n<p>         The appellant had sought information about an FIR filed by him. The PIO had refused to give<br \/>\ninformation claiming exemption under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not given any<br \/>\njustification to show how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has not been able to establish that disclosing the information would impede the process<br \/>\nof prosecution. Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act exempts disclosure of &#8220;information which would impede<br \/>\nthe process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>Justice Ravindra Bhat has held in Bhagatsingh vs. CIC WP (c ) no. 3114\/2007-<br \/>\n&#8220;13. Access to information, under Section 3 of the Act, is the rule and exemptions under Section 8, the<br \/>\nexception. Section 8 being a restriction on this fundamental right, must therefore is to be strictly<br \/>\nconstrued. It should not be interpreted in manner as to shadow the very right itself. Under Section 8,<br \/>\nexemption from releasing information is granted if it would impede the process of investigation or the<br \/>\nprosecution of the offenders. It is apparent that the mere existence of an investigation process cannot be a<br \/>\nground for refusal of the information; the authority withholding information must show satisfactory<br \/>\nreasons as to why the release of such information would hamper the investigation process. Such reasons<br \/>\nshould be germane, and the opinion of the process being hampered should be reasonable and based on<br \/>\nsome material. Sans this consideration, Section 8(1)(h) and other such provisions would become the haven<br \/>\nfor dodging demands for information.\n<\/p>\n<p>14. A rights based enactment is akin to a welfare measure, like the Act, should receive a liberal<br \/>\ninterpretation. The contextual background and history of the Act is such that the exemptions, outlined in<br \/>\nSection 8, relieving the authorities from the obligation to provide information, constitute restrictions on<br \/>\nthe exercise of the rights provided by it. Therefore, such exemption provisions have to be construed in<br \/>\ntheir terms; there is some authority supporting this view ( <a href=\"\/doc\/641119\/\">See Nathi Devi v. Radha Devi Gupta<\/a> 2005 (2)<br \/>\nSCC 201; <a href=\"\/doc\/499867\/\">B. R. Kapoor v. State of Tamil Nadu<\/a> 2001 (7) SCC 231 and <a href=\"\/doc\/485394\/\">V. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy<\/a><br \/>\n1977 (3) SCC 99). Adopting a different approach would result in narrowing the rights and approving a<br \/>\njudicially mandated class of restriction on the rights under the Act, which is unwarranted.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>As per Section 19(5) &#8220;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was<br \/>\njustified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the<br \/>\ncase may be, who denied the request.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                 Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> Denial of a citizen&#8217;s fundamental right must be justified and the mere act of continuing a prosecution<br \/>\ncannot be used to deny citizens&#8217; rights. In view of this, the Commission does not accept the denial of<br \/>\ninformation under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>As per Section 19(5) of the RTI Act in any appeal proceeding the onus to prove that the denial of<br \/>\ninformation was justified is on the PIO who denied the information. Based on the PIO&#8217;s reply and the<br \/>\norder of the FAA the Commission does not see any definite case being made out how disclosing the<br \/>\ninformation sought by the Appellant will impeded the prosecution. The PIO&#8217;s contention is not upheld.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The PIO is directed to provide the complete information sought by the appellant, as<br \/>\nper available records, before 10 July 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                           20 June 2011<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) AN<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 ENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000298\/SG\/12984 Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000298\/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant: : Mr. Sajjan Kumar Agarwal, C-20, Sawaai Singh Highway, Bani Park, JAIPUR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1044,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011"},"wordCount":1044,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011","name":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-11T09:39:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumar-aggarwal-vs-cbi-on-20-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Sajjan Kumar Aggarwal vs Cbi on 20 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99960"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99960\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}