{"id":21064,"date":"2012-06-21T17:52:13","date_gmt":"2012-06-21T12:22:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.in\/news\/?p=21064"},"modified":"2012-06-21T17:52:13","modified_gmt":"2012-06-21T12:22:13","slug":"insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","title":{"rendered":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0\u00a0<span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/Maharashtra\"><span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\">Maharashtra<\/span><\/a> Consumer Redressal Commission<\/strong><\/span> has directed <span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/New-India-Assurance-Company\"><span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\">New India Assurance Company<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/span> to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her foreign medical claim and deficiency in service.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Presiding member P N Kashalkar<\/strong> ordered the insurance company to pay this amount along with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from the date of rejection of the claim, October 20, 2010, till actual realisation, besides Rs 20,000 as costs incurred by complainant Nina Sudhir Thackersey.<\/p>\n<p>The complainant had taken an Overseas Mediclaim Policy from New India Assurance Company for USD 1,00,000 towards illness and treatment for accident for the period April 26, 2010 to April 25, 2011.<\/p>\n<p>While on her trip to<span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\"><strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/Zurich\"><span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\">Zurich<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/span> in <span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/Switzerland\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Switzerland<\/span><\/a><\/span> on May 9, 2010 she complained of constant chest pain and upper abdominal pain, following which she was admitted at Klinik Hirslanden in Zurich.At the clinic, Nina was examined by Dr Med. A Muller, Dr Henry Perschak and Dr Stefano Tresch and was subsequently admitted in the intensive care unit where she was administered dialysis. Nina was indoor patient at the <span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\"><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/Clinic-(musician)\"><span style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\">clinic<\/span><\/a><\/span> for 19 days, and was discharged on May 28, 2010.<\/p>\n<p>Nina was asked to stay back for four days and called for re-consultation on June 4, 2010. On June 1, she was examined again by Dr Tresch who advised her by issuing a certificate that she should go back to India accompanied by a doctor. She returned to India on June 2, along with her husband and an Indian doctor.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her foreign medical claim and deficiency in service. Presiding member P N Kashalkar ordered the insurance company to pay this amount along with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[4061,9187,9185,9186],"class_list":["post-21064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-top-law-news","tag-consumer-forum","tag-consumer-rights-in-case-of-rejection-of-medi-claim","tag-insurer-ordered-to-pay-rs-52-lakh-for-rejecting-medi-claim","tag-maharashtra-consumer-redressal-commission"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/04\/legal-factors-affecting-business.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5bed6309aad9141bf373167e6730d0fc\"},\"headline\":\"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\"},\"wordCount\":243,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Consumer forum\",\"consumer rights in case of rejection of medi-claim\",\"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim\",\"Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Top Law News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\",\"name\":\"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Top Law News\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/category\\\/top-law-news\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates\",\"description\":\"Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1\",\"width\":250,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5bed6309aad9141bf373167e6730d0fc\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.in\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/author\\\/legalnews\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates","description":"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates","og_description":"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","og_site_name":"Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/04\/legal-factors-affecting-business.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/5bed6309aad9141bf373167e6730d0fc"},"headline":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim","datePublished":"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim"},"wordCount":243,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["Consumer forum","consumer rights in case of rejection of medi-claim","Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim","Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission"],"articleSection":["Top Law News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim","name":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim - Legal News India - Supreme Court &amp; High Court Updates","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-06-21T12:22:13+00:00","description":"The\u00a0\u00a0Maharashtra Consumer Redressal Commission has directed New India Assurance Company to pay Rs 52.07 lakh to a city resident for repudiating her - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-ordered-pay-rs-52-lakh-rejecting-medi-claim#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Top Law News","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/top-law-news"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Insurer ordered to pay Rs 52 lakh for rejecting medi-claim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/","name":"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","description":"Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization","name":"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates","alternateName":"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/05\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/05\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/5bed6309aad9141bf373167e6730d0fc","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/12d62475e086682c2073a800da955a5073b9362a0d17b2f724156a3b955214e2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.in"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/author\/legalnews"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":34571,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurer-asked-pay-rs-1l-compensation-client","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":0},"title":"Insurer asked to pay Rs 1L compensation to client","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Accusing an insurance company of deficiency in service, the Thane District Consumer Redressel Forum has directed the firm and a claim settler to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation to a complainant. President of the forum Umesh Jhavalalikar and member N D Kadam, in their order issued recently, also asked the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Top Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Top Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/top-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"1L compensation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.in\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/1L-compensation.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21821,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/rejection-of-claim-onfanciful-ground-costs-lic-rs-4l","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":1},"title":"Rejection of claim on&#8221;fanciful ground&#8221; costs LIC Rs 4L","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"July 17, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer court has directed the LIC to pay Rs 4L as LIC has rejected a claim of a widow, a life insurance policy holder, on her husband's death on a \"fanciful ground\". The New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ordered the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Top Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Top Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/top-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":34300,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurance-co-asked-rs-2-5-lakh-thane-man","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":2},"title":"Insurance co asked Rs 2.5 lakh to Thane man","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"July 19, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Holding that ICICI Lombard General Insurance was deficient in its services while dealing with a claim, the district consumer forum here has asked the company to pay a compensation of Rs 2.50 lakh to a policy holder. In their recent ruling, Thane District Consumer Redressal Forum President Umesh Jhavalikar and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Top Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Top Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/top-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.in\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/justice.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57364,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission-asks-lic-to-pay-claim-interest-to-policy-holders-widow-trashes-plea-of-hiding-ailments","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":3},"title":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Asks LIC to Pay Claim, Interest to Policy Holder&#8217;s Widow, Trashes Plea of Hiding Ailments","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rejecting Life Insurance Corporation (LIC)'s claim that a policy-holder lied about his health condition at the time of purchasing insurance, the national consumer forum has directed the firm to pay Rs 1.5 lakh along with bonus & interest to his widow. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) asked Life\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Corporate Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Corporate Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/corporate-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":40819,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/insurance-firm-asked-to-pay-rs-3-lakh-claim-to-widow","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":4},"title":"Insurance firm asked to pay Rs 3 lakh claim to widow","author":"Legal India News","date":"January 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer court here has directed an insurancecompany to pay Rs 3 lakh claim amount to a woman following the death of her husband due to illness. In her complaint, the woman Mamta Prakash Gandhi informed the Thane District Consumer Redressel Forum that her late husband Prakash Gandhi had taken\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Consumer Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Consumer Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/consumer-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/08\/NCDRC.jpg?fit=420%2C239&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":40580,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/health-insurance-frm-asked-to-pay-rs-3-lk-to-claimant","url_meta":{"origin":21064,"position":5},"title":"Health insurance frm asked to pay Rs 3 lk to claimant","author":"Legal India News","date":"December 23, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer\u00a0court of\u00a0Thane\u00a0has ordered a health insurance\u00a0company to pay Rs 3 lakhs to a claimant as it failed to prove that his wife was suffering from a disease prior to issuance of the policy. Complainant Dilip Mohite informed the Thane District Consumer Redressal Forum that he had taken a floater\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Consumer Law News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Consumer Law News","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/consumer-law-news"},"img":{"alt_text":"Health insurance frm asked to pay Rs 3 lk to claimant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/04\/Right-to-Public-Service-Act.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6H5Bf-5tK","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}