{"id":57285,"date":"2019-08-26T20:59:52","date_gmt":"2019-08-26T15:29:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/?p=57285"},"modified":"2019-08-26T20:59:52","modified_gmt":"2019-08-26T15:29:52","slug":"ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","title":{"rendered":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):’In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard’ Justice Chandrachud says"},"content":{"rendered":"

Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, Justice Ranjan Gogoi. Today he focused on oral evidence and documentary evidence.<\/p>\n

Relying on witness testimonies, Mr. Jain submitted that there have been no allegations that Nirmohi Akhara misused its rights or did anything adverse the deity. He said that these are the only grounds on the basis of which Shebaitship rights of a shebait can be taken away. He submitted that shebait is like Karta of a family.<\/p>\n

Justice Bobde seeking clarification, said that Nirmohi Akhara is not claiming ownership in the normal sense, they are claiming management rights, but what all do they manage?<\/p>\n

Mr. SK Jain said that puja-aarti at the disputed site is to be done and controlled by them.<\/p>\n

Mr SK Jain further submitted that only shebait can file that suit, but as far as construction of temple is concerned, they\u2019ll take help of other Hindu parties as well, they don\u2019t want monopoly in construction.<\/p>\n

Relying upon oral evidence, Mr. Jain stated that nobody has disputed their Shebaitship and possession of over 150 years, of both inner and outer courtyard.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Justice Chandrachud observed that the job of Nirmohi Akhara is simply to ensure that puja is done, offerings are received as per rituals and traditions.<\/p>\n

Mr. Jain said that giving 1\/3rd<\/sup>\u00a0of the disputed property to Ram Lalla and Sunni waqf board was \u2018wrong\u2019, he said that they cannot be given possession, decree should have been passed in favour of Nirmohi Akhara only.<\/p>\n

He went on with submissions stating that when digging was by the Archaeology Department, under the chabootra another chabootra was found exactly beneath it. Relying on witness testimonies he submitted that the disputed structure was never used as a mosque till 1856-57, and no historic evidence has been found to show that namaz was offered there.<\/p>\n

Justice Bobde told Mr. Jain to focus on those evidences which support his case and prove his right of Shebaitship.<\/p>\n

Mr. Jain stated that \u201cThere were tons of documents establishing the right of shebaitship, but in dacoity they all have got stolen.\u201d<\/p>\n

After quoting a number of witness testimonies, Mr. Jain submitted that presence of Nirmohi Akhara and its possession has never been doubted, there is no dispute about it. He stated that the Allahabad High Court has also recognised in its impugned judgement that Nirmohi Akhara was managing the affairs even after idols were placed under the central dome of the disputed structure.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud told Mr. Jain that he has categorically denied that<\/a>Plaintiff No. 1 and Plaintiff No. 2 in Suit 5\u00a0are juridical persons, however in his oral submissions he says that they are juridical persons, but, the moment he accepts that they are juridical persons, they have right to be represented by counsels.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud asked him that if the suit of the deity fails, who will he be shebait for? \u201cYou stand together, you fall together\u201d Justice Chandrachud added.<\/p>\n

Mr. Jain said that his only endeavour it to get his suit accepted. This prompted Justice Bobde to ask, \u201cShould we take it then that you are not seeking dismissal of Suit 5?\u201d Mr. Jain stated that in this regard he will be able to make a statement tomorrow.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud told Mr. Jain that there is no boundary between his claim as a shebait and claim of Plaintiff No. 3 as next friend, because even if the case is decreed in their favour, Nirmohi Akhara can independently claim shebaitship.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud further explained that the moment he said that Plaintiff No. 1 and Plaintiff No. 2 are juridical persons, there is no conflict between his suit and their suit, and even if the suit is decreed in their favour, he will still be entitled to assert his cause of action.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud told him that he is unnecessarily entering an area of conflict which does not belong to him, it belongs to Sunni Central Waqf Board.<\/p>\n

Mr. Jain was further told Justice Chandrachud that his case is that Suit no. 5 cannot be maintained, then the only consequence would be dismissal of the Suit, and if the Suit no. 5 is dismissed, he should consider what the consequences would be for him, he cannot be shebait for a mosque.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud said that his submission should be to independently accept his suit, without opposing to Suit no. 5.<\/p>\n

Agreeing, Mr. Jain submitted that his endeavour is this only, but the possession has to be handed over to him.<\/p>\n

Quoting from precedents, Mr. Jain stated that an idol is certainly a juridical person, who can hold property, has power to sue, be sued in respect of the property, but its personality is linked with physical personality of Shebiat.<\/p>\n

Relying on caselaws, Mr. Jain further submitted that it has been held that shebait can maintain a suit on behalf of the deity in his own name and need not implead the deity as a party to any case.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud pointed out that in the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard. Mr. Jain said that the personality of idol is merged with the shebiat, and the shebiat is suing on behalf of the deity. However, Mr. Jain said that plaintiff in the suit of next friend has mentioned that Shebiat is not acting in the interest of deity.<\/p>\n

Justice Chandrachud explained that if a claim is brought by debtor or there is a suit for recovery of property belonging to the deity, then you will not implead the deity, because in such a situation shebait may represent the deity, but in a situation where it has to be established whether a person is his or her shebait, then the deity clearly has right to implead and ascertain whether this person has the shebaitship.<\/p>\n

Mr. SK Jain will continue his submissions tomorrow, 27th<\/sup>\u00a0August 2019.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, Justice Ranjan Gogoi. Today he focused on oral evidence and documentary evidence. Relying on witness testimonies, Mr. Jain submitted that there have been no allegations that Nirmohi Akhara misused its rights or […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":57067,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[20124],"tags":[45410,1368],"class_list":["post-57285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-court-judiciary-legal-system","tag-advocate-sushil-kumar-jain","tag-ayodhya-case"],"yoast_head":"\nAyodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"294\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"172\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):’In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard’ Justice Chandrachud says\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\"},\"wordCount\":1001,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1\",\"keywords\":[\"Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain\",\"Ayodhya case\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Court, Judiciary & Legal System\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\",\"name\":\"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00\",\"description\":\"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1\",\"width\":294,\"height\":172},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court, Judiciary & Legal System\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/category\\\/court-judiciary-legal-system\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):’In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard’ Justice Chandrachud says\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates\",\"description\":\"Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1\",\"width\":250,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/news\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","description":"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","og_description":"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","og_site_name":"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":294,"height":172,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):’In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard’ Justice Chandrachud says","datePublished":"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says"},"wordCount":1001,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1","keywords":["Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain","Ayodhya case"],"articleSection":["Court, Judiciary & Legal System"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says","name":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):'In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard' Justice Chandrachud says - Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1","datePublished":"2019-08-26T15:29:52+00:00","description":"Senior Advocate Sushil Kumar Jain resumed his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara before the 5-Judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, - Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1","width":294,"height":172},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-caseday-12in-the-suits-in-which-deity-is-vitally-interested-it-has-to-be-heard-justice-chandrachud-says#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court, Judiciary & Legal System","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/court-judiciary-legal-system"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ayodhya Case(Day 12):’In the suits in which deity is vitally interested, it has to be heard’ Justice Chandrachud says"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/","name":"Legal News India - Supreme Court & High Court Updates","description":"Get the latest legal news from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and government. Essential updates on judgements, acts, and in-depth analysis for lawyers, advocates, and law students in India.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#organization","name":"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates","alternateName":"Legal News India for Advocates, Lawyers & Law Students","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/05\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/05\/538552_367793346590451_81997783_n.jpg?fit=250%2C250&ssl=1","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"Legal News India: Supreme Court, High Courts & Govt Updates"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?fit=294%2C172&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":57066,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/second-day-of-ayodhya-hearing-present-oral-evidence-not-statements-cji-gogoi-to-rama-lallas-lawyer","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":0},"title":"Second Day of Ayodhya Hearing: ‘Present oral evidence, not statements’, CJI Gogoi to Rama Lalla’s Lawyer","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The drama continued on the second day of most talked about Ayodhya Case hearing. \u201cWhether Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem... Has such a question ever arisen in any Court?\u201d\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0Judge, Justice S.A. Bobde, asked Senior Advocate K. Parasaran, lawyer for Ram Lalla Virajman, the deity in Ayodhya. The struggle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Court, Judiciary & Legal System"","block_context":{"text":"Court, Judiciary & Legal System","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/court-judiciary-legal-system"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-35.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57020,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-dispute-no-muslims-were-allowed-to-enter-the-structure-since-1934-says-nirmohi-akhara","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":1},"title":"Ayodhya dispute: No Muslims were allowed to enter the structure since 1934, says Nirmohi Akhara","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Nirmohi Akhara, one of the parties in the politically sensitive case of the Ayodhya land dispute, told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that no Muslims were allowed to enter the structure since 1934 and it has been in exclusive possession of the Akhara. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Court, Judiciary & Legal System"","block_context":{"text":"Court, Judiciary & Legal System","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/court-judiciary-legal-system"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57037,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-case-supreme-court-commences-hearing-nirmohi-akhara-to-continue-arguments","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":2},"title":"Ayodhya case: Supreme Court commences hearing; Nirmohi Akhara to continue arguments","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court on Wednesday commenced hearing on the second day of the politically-sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya after the efforts to arrive at an amicable settlement through mediation have failed. Senior advocate Sushil Jain, appearing for Nirmohi Akhara, one of the parties in the case, commenced\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Court, Judiciary & Legal System"","block_context":{"text":"Court, Judiciary & Legal System","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/court-judiciary-legal-system"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/07\/download-2019-07-23T165213.691.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57017,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-case-in-supreme-court-hindu-party-seeks-control-of-entire-2-77-acre-disputed-land","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":3},"title":"Ayodhya case in Supreme Court: Hindu party seeks control of entire 2.77 acre disputed land","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"A Hindu body on Tuesday strongly pitched in the Supreme Court for control and management of the entire disputed 2.77 acre land in the politically and religiously sensitive case of Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute at Ayodhya. Nirmohi Aakhara, one of the leading parties in the case, asserted its claim\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Court, Judiciary & Legal System"","block_context":{"text":"Court, Judiciary & Legal System","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/court-judiciary-legal-system"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57462,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-case-chances-brighten-for-verdict-in-november","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":4},"title":"Ayodhya case : Chances Brighten for Verdict in November","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"August 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chances of the SC giving a final verdict in Nov. in the 70-year-old litigation for ownership of the 2.77 acre Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land in Ayodhya brightened as all Hindu parties, who were awarded 2-3rd\u00a0of the disputed land by the Allahabad HC, have completed their arguments. The hearing had started\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Heritage and National Importance"","block_context":{"text":"Heritage and National Importance","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/\/heritage-and-national-importance"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/download-6-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":57853,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/ayodhya-sc-allows-nirvani-akahara-to-file-written-note-on-moulding-of-relief","url_meta":{"origin":57285,"position":5},"title":"Ayodhya: SC allows ‘Nirvani Akahara’ to file written note on moulding of relief","author":"Legal India Admin","date":"October 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Tuesday allowed 'Nirvani Akahara', one of the Hindu parties in the decades-old case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya, to file a written note seeking the \"right to manage worship of the deity\" as 'shebait' (devotee) at the site. A counsel for 'Nirvani Akahara' mentioned\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Profile Cases"","block_context":{"text":"High Profile Cases","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/category\/high-profile-cases"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/10\/ayodhya-case.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6H5Bf-eTX","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}