A Comparative Analysis of Patents, Copyright and Trademarks

3
1446

 

 PATENTSCOPYRIGHTSTRADEMARKS
 The Relevant Indian Law.The Patents Act, 1970. [As amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999,2002 and 2005The Copyright Act, 1957.The Trade Marks Act, 1999.
  The Relevant Rules.The Patents Rules, 1972. [As amended by the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 1999, 2003, and 2006.The Copyright Rules, 1958.The Trade Marks Rules, 2002.
 

 

 

 

 

Who Can Apply?

[Section 6](a) The true and first inventor of the invention, OR

(b) An assignee of the true and first inventor, OR

(c) The legal representative of any deceased person who immediately before his death was entitled to make such an application.

[Section 45]

  • The Author of the work, OR
  • The Publisher of the work, OR
  • The Owner of the work, OR
  • Any other person interested in the work.

 

[Section 18]

  • Any person claiming to be the proprietor of a trademark used or proposed to be used by him.

 

 PATENTSCOPYRIGHTSTRADEMARKS
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term / Duration.

[Section 53]

  • 20 Years from the date of filing of Application for Patent.

 

[Section 22 – 29](a) In respect of  literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work (other than Photograph) published within the lifetime of the author;

 

  • 60 Years from the beginning of the Calendar year next following the year in which the author dies.

 

(b) In respect of Photographs or Cinematograph Films or Sound Recordings.

 

  • 60 Years from the beginning of the Calendar year next following the year in which they are published.

 

 

(c ) In respect of Government Work, Works of Public Undertakings or Works of International Organisations.

 

  • 60 Years from the beginning of the Calendar year next following the year in which the work is first published.
Section 25]

  • 10 Years

(May be renewed for 10 Years from the date of expiration of original / last renewal of the registration.)

 

 PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION PATENTSCOPYRIGHTSTRADEMARKS
(a) Persons entitledto apply. 

 

(b) Form of

 

 

 

 

(c) List of Forms.

 

 

 

 

(d) Fees.

 

  • Section 6 of the Act,
  • Section 7 of the Act,
  • Rule 8 of the Rules.

 

  • SECOND SCHEDULE

 

 

 

  • FIRST SCHEDULE

(Rule 7)

  • Section 45

 

 

 

  • Rule 16

 

 

 

 

 

  • FIRST SCHEDULE

 

 

 

  • SECOND SCHEDULE

(Rule 26)

  • Section 18

 

 

 

  • Rule 12

 

 

 

 

 

  • SECOND
    SCHEDULE

 

 

 

  • FIRST
    SCHEDULE

(Rule 11)

Statement 1. There is nothing wrong in buying pirated product so long the product satisfies users requirements and priced less than original

Statement 2: One should not buy pirated product even if it is available at a lower price because it is detrimental to the interests of the rightholders and the society.

 

Table 1: Views on Performance of the Enforcement Authority by Different Target Groups

Target GroupsPercentage of RespondentsTotal No. of Respondents
SatisfactoryNot Satisfactory
Film Producers34.565.555
Video Films Producers31.868.222
Book Publishers58.241.879
Music Companies46.253.813
Public Performers51.648.493
SUB TOTAL48.151.9262
Video Cassettes Sellers56.843.281
Book sellers2.997.1137
Music Cassettes Sellers54.845.2135
Software Sellers40.259.892
SUB-TOTAL36.263.8445
Total No. of Respondents287(40.6)420 (59.4)707 (100.0)

 Note: Figures in brackets show percentage to the Total.

Source: NPC Survey

 

Table 2: Public Awareness of Copyright as perceived by various Target Groups

Target GroupsRating on Awareness (%)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryPoorTotal No. of Responses
Film ProducersNil5.624.170.454 (100.0)
Video Film Producers9.19.181.822 (100.0)
Music Companies28.614.357.114 (100.0)
Book Publishers7.920.271.989 (100.0)
Public Performers1.09.224.465.398 (100.0)
Video Cassette Sellers2.420.526.550.683 (100.0)
Music Cassettes Sellers6.68.138.247.1136 (100.0)
Computer Software Sellers1.011.922.964.2109 (100.0)
Total No. of Respondents15 (2.5)64 (10.6)158 (26.1)368 (60.8)605 (100.0)

Source: NPC Survey

 

Table 3: Responses of End users regarding buying of Pirated Products.

End UsersNo. of Respondents
Statement 1Statement 2Total Respondents
Readers40 (33.6)79 (66.4)119 (100.0)
Audio Products32 (25.2)95 (74.8)127 (100.0)
Film Viewers27 (22.3)94 (77.7)121 (100.0)
Total99 (27.0)268 (73.0)367 (100.0)

Statement 1. There is nothing wrong in buying pirated product so long the product satisfies users requirements and priced less than original

Statement 2: One should not buy pirated product even if it is available at a lower price because it is detrimental to the interests of the rightholders and the society.

 Source: NPC Survey

 

Table 4: Responses of end users regarding knowledge about the punishment on Buying Pirated products.

End UsersYesNoTotal No. of Respondents
Readers101 (82.8)21 (17.2)122 (100.0)
Users of Audio Products97 (75.8)31 (24.2)128 (100.0)
Film Viewers94 (76.4)29 (23.6)123 (100.0)
Total292 (78.2)81 (21.7)373 (100.0)

 Source: NPC Survey

 

Bibliography :-

Books referred:

Copinger and Skone James on Copyright, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1999
Cornish, W.R., Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights, Sweet & Maxwell,London, 1999
Kailasam K C, Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Wadhawa and Company,Nagpur, 2003
Lai’s The Copyright Act, Law Publishers (India) Pvt. Ltd,Allahabad, 2002
Narayanan P., Copyright and Industrial Designs, Eastern Law House, Kolkata, 2002

References:

3 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here