Legal Articles Only Senior Citizens/Parents Entitled To Prefer Appeal Against Order Of Tribunal Under Senior Citizen Act 2007: Madras High Court March 2, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In an elegant, exemplary, eloquent and effective judgment titled K Raju v. Union of India & Ors. in W.P. No. 29988 of 2019, the Madras High Court has rightly, remarkably and recently on 19 February 2021 held that only senior citizens/parents are entitled to file an appeal against an order passed by the Tribunal […] Read more » Madras High Court Only Senior Citizens/Parents Entitled To Prefer Appeal Against Order Of Tribunal Senior Citizen Act 2007
Legal Articles Exception Of Customary Divorce U/S 29(2) Hindu Marriage Act Not Attracted In Absence Of Declaration From Civil Court Regarding Its Validity: Calcutta HC March 2, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a recent, remarkable, righteous and rational decision titled Smt. Krishna Veni Vs The Union of India and others in WPA No. 2346 of 2018 delivered on February 18, 2021, the single Judge Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya has held that merely obtaining a customary divorce will not attract the exception envisaged under Section […] Read more » Exception Of Customary Divorce single Judge Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya Smt. Krishna Veni Vs The Union of India and others
Legal Articles Pass Reasoned Judgment Along With Operative Order: SC Criticizes NCDRC Practice Of Passing ‘Reasons To Follow’ Orders March 2, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It cannot be just glossed over that none other than the Supreme Court has in a latest, learned, laudable and landmark judgment titled Sudipta Chakrobarty & Anr. Vs. Ranaghat S.D. Hospital & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 9404/2019 delivered as recently as on February 15, 2021 while criticizing the practice of ‘reasons to follow’ […] Read more » Pass Reasoned Judgment Along With Operative Order
Legal Articles Calcutta HC Judge Recalls Her Order Even After No Objection By Both Parties March 2, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It is really remarkable, refreshing, rejuvenating, righteous and reasonable that the Calcutta High Court has most recently on February 22, 2021 in a latest, learned, laudable and landmark judgment titled Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in IA No. GA 2 of 2020 in CS 94 of 2020 and […] Read more » Calcutta HC Judge Recalls Her Order
Legal Articles Refusal To Give Tea Not Sudden Or Grave Provocation: Bombay HC February 26, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In an enduring, empowering, enlightening, enriching and encouraging judgment for women titled Santosh Mahadev Atkar vs The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 544 of 2019 delivered recently on February 2, 2021, the Bombay High Court has observed that the medieval notion of the wife being the ‘property of the husband to do […] Read more » Bombay HC Refusal To Give Tea Not Sudden Or Grave Provocation
Legal Articles Suspicion, However Strong Cannot Take The Place Of Proof: SC February 21, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It is really remarkable, refreshing, rejuvenating and reasonable to learn that the Supreme Court has just recently on February 12, 2021 in a latest, learned, landmark and laudable judgment titled State of Odisha vs. Banabihari Mohapatra in Special Leave Petition (Cri) No. 1156/2021 has reiterated that suspicion, however strong cannot take the place of […] Read more » SC Strong suspicion Cannot Take The Place Of Proof Suspicion
Legal Articles Unfortunate That The Properties Of Religious And Charitable Institutions Are Being Usurped By Criminals: Allahabad High Court February 21, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It is most unfortunate, most alarming and most reprehensible that none other than the Allahabad High Court which is the biggest court in whole of Asia has observed most seriously in a latest, learned, laudable and landmark judgment titled Bharat Das @ Ram Newaz Singh v. State of U.P. in Bail No. 8577 of […] Read more » Allahabad High Court Unfortunate That The Properties Of Religious And Charitable Institutions Are Being Usurped By Criminals
Legal Articles Not Proper To Keep Him In Jail Forever: SC Reduces Sentence Imposed On Dacoity Cum Murder Convict To 22 Years Imprisonment February 21, 2021 / February 21, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a welcome, wise and wonderful judgment titled Shivalinga @ Shivalingayya vs State of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No. 1186 of 2018 delivered just recently on February 15, 2021, a two Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar and Justice Vineet Saran reduced the life sentence imposed on a man […] Read more » Dacoity Cum Murder Convict Shivalinga @ Shivalingayya vs State of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No. 1186 of 2018
Legal Articles Detention Of A Person Despite Furnishing Of Personal Bond Violative Of Article 21: Allahabad HC February 19, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment While espousing fully, firmly and finally the basic legal rights of a person, the Allahabad High Court has most recently in a latest, learned, landmark and laudable judgment titled Shiv Kumar Verma & Anr. V. State of UP & Ors. in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. – 16386 of 2020 held very rightly, remarkably […] Read more » Allahabad HC Detention Of A Person Detention Of A Person Despite Furnishing Of Personal Bond Violative Of Article 21 Furnishing Of Personal Bond Violative Of Article 21
Legal Articles Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Where The Compromise Was Vitiated By Fraud, Misrepresentation Or Mistake: SC February 19, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment While shedding full light on the question of whether a consent decree would or would not serve as an estoppel, a two Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar and Justice Vineet Saran in Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd vs Beant Singh in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 2224-2225 of 2021 […] Read more » Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Where The Compromise Was Vitiated By Fraud Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
