High Court Kerala High Court

Kishore vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 16 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kishore vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 16 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 5485 of 2010()


1. KISHORE, S/O. ANASOOYA, AGED 25,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. KUMAR, S/O. MARY,AGED 27,
3. KISHORE, AGED 26, S/O. VENKITAYA,
4. LASAR, S/O. MANORAMA, AGED 22,
5. JOHNSON, AGED 29, S/O. MALLAYA, H.NO.5,
6. PRADEEP, AGED 26, S/O. BABU AND SAKTHI,

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SHAIJAN JOSEPH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :16/09/2010

 O R D E R
                        V.RAMKUMAR, J.
             ----------------------------------------------
             Bail Application No.5485 of 2010
            ------------------------------------------------
        Dated this the 16th day of September, 2010

                               ORDER

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime

No.1178/2009 of Angamaly Police Station for an offence

punishable under Section 380 read with Section 34 I.P.C.,

seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on

3/6/2009. The petitioners were arrested on 7/9/2009.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the

application submitting inter alia that the petitioners constitute

a group of habitual offenders from Tamil Nadu and Andhra

and already they are involved in nine cases and trial of the

above case C.C.No.408 of 2009 is going on in the court of

Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Aluva.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations

levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the

parties, the nature of the injury or loss sustained and the other

facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are

released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate

Bail Appln.No.5485/2010
: 2 :

the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the

petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice.

I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at

this stage.

4. The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Aluva

shall complete the trial of the case expeditiously and shall

send bi-weekly reports to the Registry of this Court regarding

the progress of the trial of C.C.No.408/2009 and connected

cases.

This petition is accordingly dismissed.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

skj