Employees State Insurance Corp vs Anindita Srivastava &Amp; Ors on 20 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         MA No.393 of 2008
                EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORP
                              Versus
                   ANINDITA SRIVASTAVA & ORS
                             -----------

06/ 20.09.2010 In view of the office notes it has been reported that

the notice has validly served on respondent no. 1 and

respondent no. 2 and 3 has appeared. However, with regard

to the respondent no. 4 it has been stated that the notice

issued on him did not return.

However, from the perusal of the records the

address of respondent no. 4 is quite vague as not mentioned

that respondent no. 4 is the Managing Director of which

company and hence appellant is directed to take steps for

fresh service of notice on respondent no. 4 both by ordinary

process as well as registered covered for which requisites

etc. must be filed within three weeks, failing which the

memo of appeal shall stand rejected without further

reference to a Bench.

Put up after receipt of service of notice.

       Kundan                          (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Leave a Comment Cancel