Sreenadh.K.C. Aged 20 Years vs The Controller Of Examination on 31 March, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 10188 of 2010(W)


1. SREENADH.K.C. AGED 20 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.B.PRAJITH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :31/03/2010

 O R D E R
              T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
             --------------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C)No.10188 of 2010
             ---------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner was a student of Sree Narayana College,

Nattika, Thrissur for B.A. Economics. He appeared for the

second year examination English in the year 2006. After

publication of results the petitioner applied for revaluation of

English paper. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 stating

that the answer script of his English paper I is not traceable

and hence a direction is issued to write re-examination of that

subject. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition has been

filed.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University

submitted that the subject English consists of 3 papers and

two papers were revalued and there is no change in the result.

With regard to the paper English I answer paper was not

traceable and therefore a memo was issued to him as per

Ext.P3. He was directed to forward a declaration, but that

also was not given.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that he was staying abroad in connection with the job and

WPC.No.10188 of 2010
: 2 :

therefore he could not respond in time. In the light of the

situation arising as above, presently the petitioner can only

appear for the examination, if permitted by the University. If

the petitioner submits appropriate representation requesting

for a chance to appear in the re-examination the same will be

considered and appropriate action will be taken by the

University. The petitioner will file a representation along with

a copy of the judgment for consideration by the University

immediately.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)

skj