IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 5606 of 2007(P)
1. CHANDRASEKHARAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
... Respondent
2. THE SECRETARY,
3. MOLLY GEORGE,
For Petitioner :SRI.I.DINESH MENON
For Respondent :SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Dated :30/03/2010
O R D E R
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
-------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No.5606 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010
JUDGMENT
This writ petition was admitted and an order of stay of
further proceedings was granted on 20.2.2007. That order is
not extended thereafter.
The writ petitioner contended that the State Transport
Appellate Tribunal had entertained a revision and decided
that petition without calling for the records. It is further
contended that the Tribunal had not heard the writ petitioner.
The uncontroverted statement in the counter affidavit of the
third respondent is that the petitioner and his counsel were
heard and specific reference is made regarding the identity of
the counsel, the date of postings and as to what transpired in
each posting dates. In spite of time being given for such
purpose, no reply affidavit is placed on record. I do not find
any ground to interfere with the order of the STAT. There is
WPC.5606/07
2
no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error in the impugned
order. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly
dismissed.
Sd/-
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.
kkb.19/04.