%
ammgm E'-W?~% fiflfim
WVQAW' WW5' wmmwmsammw mmrw mmmm KW' %fi.%M,W?»%%4% Wififi flflifim' Q?' KfiA%Nfia'E'fi:Kfi% Mifiiwi QQUWY
IN 'ME men cmm or xAmm'rA1<A AT
DATED ms Tm 1 rm my 0? 1
THE Hoxmm lhIRJUS'ifICE§:.'StIf§}I}iSE§'Ia};;§.§fi§E».:vE %
? %
1 SI-IARAVANA KUMAR
son or cmyI¢A1'i?I09; a
R3333??? 531175'?-:552'.5n 11* .
4' PETITIONER
(By RAVI 2" mv. A/w 3121 JEEVAH J
xqazxnmm, )
' 1' Kawnrarm
- X "ESY Km~.m;«:srm=tJRA
%%%mLrc:g f:3TA'HC}R'
B&H€iALGRE«-56£X3'79§ RESPONDENT
: If L : ‘€.By”SRI B.3AmImIsrmA,Hcc3P3
fifitfiiir
THIS CRLJ7′ IS FILED UISAS9 (.’.R.P.C BY THE
x Anwcam mm TI-E Psnnonm mama ‘I’HA”I’
THIS HOITBLE CGIRT MAY BE PLEASE!) T8
anew! wvung 3.4; wmmwmwmm Wflfifl fififlfl? WW WRNATAKR WEQEWE CQUW’ Q? m.%N&T&Mfi Wfifl mmmm Q? iéfiflfifififiififi MGW €Q%.m’
ETKLARGE THE F’E’I’f£’IOHER OH BAIL IR.__
110.323! 2909 OF KAMAKSHIPALYA T V” v
STA’I’IOH,IR C.C.H€).140€H/2069 PER’D§i’i’}–.’,V’~C}1%”
FILE OF THE V5-AI)£}I’I’IO!IAL CI-El?’ ‘
MAGISTRATE, BAEGALORE. FOR. ~ >
Pmzs 356(A),.376,5G6 or %
THE comm’ MADE ”
Tms c:m..P COMM} A’
‘The petmoneffsa of bail in
Crime 26/4;:2ao9 by
far an fi’ea:we
puxildmble flat’ IPC.
2. Sm games um um
aacusadmk mad c:x::umt’£e’ 4
Q has been mfl
asem.
$2-1 Rafi: B. Ram, ksamed mm’ mums}
L % the pmomsumitm am mamas caf
3 cf WC. has mt bum aumcmd far the
Sacfimz 366ofIP€.3 requirm that themv5.m*
akmukt have mm subject in ixitnrewraeby am!
W
person and there ‘a me such angafion in the;
It is alas: submitted that the doctor :)piz1i;;j;1′
auyinteraourse mm’ tlusviemmgrl. T %
4. Leaxfi comm}
Tramfer Cermoate dhahkggs ia }-:1
minor and am has that the
aocused stands on at
5.__ V’ idiie punfnhabke under
Section that victim is a
minor it E not a fit case for
tlm pafitian is dismissed.
the matter is ¢.’:ommitt¢ci, the trial
V xiispoae of tm was as early as
than one ymr from the date ofmaeipt
:
Sd/–r
Iudge
wwwmafmmjimmmmmummm WWW a;:a:.mm;”£” Q? Kflcfiflktfiaflfi. Hlfifi QGUW” Q? WfiRNfit”i’%%& MGR QGKEW’ G? KflR?%&’%’fit%% $156″ @054?