IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.29674 of 2011
Md. Israil, son of Sabebjan Miyan
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
2. 12.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for
the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379/34 of
the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that the occurrence took place on
account of land dispute and the petitioner has fair antecedents,
let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed
by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Sono (Charkapather) P.S.
Case No. 72 of 2011 subject to the following conditions: (i) That
one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who
will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish
information to the court about any change in the address of the
petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the
petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he
shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state
on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the
2
petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after
his release in the present case and thereafter the court below
will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail
on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an
undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given
date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to
do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his
bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v)That
the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he
fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to
be cancelled.
( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali