High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri M Krishnappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri M Krishnappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 July, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
-. -. .........-...-nu-1 nu.-an \....uuIu ur ISHKNAIAKR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH I

-1-

3: THE HIGH comm' or KARHATAKA, BAIIGIQQORE

DATED THIS THE 24*" SAY or-' JuL§*%2a e s' 1 

 

..o..s_.u------------u.uo.ouo

1 .smn 5V.,V    
sycmfm 
AGEn"Afi{,2UT '12 name'   "V 
   
N0.28,::_SE2II4T"'.?%1$a("'$:#.*RA§ A

  srr;m2:%jAk%.%  
    %
 . k     ...PE'1'ITIONER

ffiysri : 1; ADV.)

................'.~,.

'1':-:fi'sTA?fi T1131? Km
mvmmwsn Hvrmsamaav

 Rmmgnmmimumm
 A "z;.s.auma.ma,
 1.

 *fI;~§E izczsmnrssmmn
-.  mtmaus mctncnanrmns

" " . EKDOW3EEZ¢'I'$.

V' Gcrvmkzmmmmwnmtwtacn,

GPPOEYPE IEHTIY3 HCBPIIBL,
cnaumwm, ;
aammwaz as }.x,/'



. nu. nuns:

 '33-

.. nfygni vr nnnwaannn I-slur! QUURT O1' KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

*2-

am LPLKSHHI l9'J'LRA85l}IA

SWAN'! C'-HARITIE3

FQRT BANGALOE 2 ;
REP%E1!l'I''ED BY ITS SECRERRY.

smnemnmsli  
310 mm n.  I
AGED ABOUT asvmm

RIG BETTAHALSIXR POST,

JAM HOBLI,

BJ&HGALOR.E 57..

smvmoahnuumm 
SJOHHVENEATAPPA
aamnaaommmana,  
Fe,-':::: 230.77, 413 cases,      '- 
5'1*riMAmH<xm,.3fi§BxAm.K.€  - " %
I§'.'T'.HAGaR,    . 2 
  

sma  
AGED     V' " 
RIG 1! 1562,'J_YTOHEmEa$'!I  
RSTHAMAWRQAD, -_  
'.2143 8'rA<.¥E,J.P.I!A_.(}AR, '

A V  m1%wmn 
" T. V .,i£-»,!,_'s:z wmrapm
~ AGE;  45 mm.
Rm'  3%? mm ROAD,
" PIAGENBRA BLOCK,
" slmmaan,
BAH€?ALORE an

 5  SE13 MGARMU

: 5; 'Ra.M.

 RE 4.

19 gm N nmma

awn ABOUT as 'mans,
Rm at 169; 1, GIWX canes,
BYA'I*ARAYANAPURfi.,
BELLARY ROAD,
aaxmwaz 43.

11 SmKYMI$ Y&¥A.A'--.
sgovaanmmpmax   é
a.:::;ED AEIOUT 43   % 
Rf0$tKODIGE1!§'.fi'aL£I,      

    
 RE 9?  4. 

12 am P VI.;fA?KU?iIAR__     
man  wmm, _    L
we 4: 759,' 331: A   "
41151 BLOCK, JAYWGAR.' «  
mammnz 11., »   %

13:-T" 3   """ " '%
* §.c;»,12:£=
R£'3.#21 z.%51T-3 wanes.

 _._. 7... u... -nu':-1-r1:\r'I

L   mamwlmamj

mama 
 RESPOIIDEHTB

a~y;%%: B vEmA1=m, AGA F02 R1 & 2; am G s
  an. AIJV. FOR 895: A mnmzsumn mo.
 AJI;§V.'F~E}EAR4 To 1213; R3 31).)

 _ .. "  'THIS 'Wm? PETITION 18 FILEB URDER ARPIGLE3 226
  22''? G1? THE GQRETHUTIOE GP IIGDI8. PRAYIITG TO
  TEE QRIJER D1'. 4.}.G.2OD'7, PASSED 3? TE 81
  ARK-A AN!) DIRECT 'THE RE'3POllDEI¢'I'$ TO

wnsman TEE RAIIE OI?'  ENR FOR THE 908'!' OF

mums panama op THE nmmcmm comatrrrm or ,
THE 123 msmvrton ms Aux-<:. \/



. ..-an uvunl ur RHKNHIHKR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGH (

.5..

Saial 59.52. Ann:-arure-C '5 the  an

15.2w: by the Endawment 
pexaacrm intwested in filim J   
ajppointed as mambms of  _ '   '.
r'wpo:§d¢nt-Ixzstrittltiznn.   *

applicafixsn. The  nine
Sacfimi 25   appli-'atitmfia
tn:  order at

 

Isflanafig      am-ma M ;.
challenged in  

 

 '  ofthe pewiorm Tn mapondmm-8,

   mt aubnfit any application at all

§  «;_¢f notification have been appointed

V K   :3? the man; r:omm.i%e :3? ti: 3"'

'  'lbs rwpondnnt No.9 in an
 by pmfesaiun who had appeared in a. case for
  ;+.he mm, is disqualified for being aprpainted as 9.
mmher."fherespo:ndm'1t!lo.?ina!:enant?mrespectof



. ".1 uuwl . -...\.-ulu ur IKHKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR3' OF KARNATAKA HIGH I

-9-

paasafi by this Court should mt afibct tha  <11'

9» The mud Adamo" ma    Cf   he  V

submitted that the  V   
 the  gag;   

clear was  is oanwmxtod.

was ,  mmmmn calling fiar

 wens called for by
  {gm  who did net even apply.

   abjmt 91' issue of notmation calling

   becmzw a fires. Eves':1 ifthe Act '3
_ fin   -mm the Gosreawxfl chooses a

 mode in appoint the u-uatma uni is-sum as

  wk far app1icat:in,, the Gowmmxent loses

 . in appoint such pmsons who did not even

  V-uapply fa'; pursuance of said notificafisan. 'Iharefore, the

apmmmmt nf respondents-8, 19, 11, 13, 13 who dii

.9. . .fy.gnu ur :\HI’uVu-\IM!\R. fllbfl £.UUK”l’ OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA PHGH C

-10..

mt wan make applicaticam is an the £393 of
a.ndtherwe£::ra,stt-uckdown. ‘p u A4

31. In an fir as 7*

cf the mm property, ;3 ‘4.:. 1:’:;¢:Vquahv:v””1fi’:


ibm at all.  '3
£22,.    pointed «mt

   ' %  5* mspondem is
 "I the Gavernmam hat: to

 

mum: the aI1ega’£::11::s’ and counter
thh fiedinga and 3’1: in Int £92-

‘ €:,té’u1}i.A§jc3«.g¢ into the:.:’:’ quafifimtion at this smge. But
an , the conntiizutitm cf the managmg’

mun cannot be struck down £31 part. Ema:-‘ the

K V V’ _’ “@213-f1′.t1.1’Ii31′}. shouli be upheld at ifthene in defect
the constzitution, R has to go in its entirety. The

rmzmn is the patiticmer ‘3 an applicant, his applicatiazra.
iannteumfiwedmfiavmfiflmwpmmomwhoam
othafme quafifiad, mm?’ cases are :1: be wrzssidered vh-

%/

-. — ……..n.n….-. mm I uvunl ur nmmu-unnn HIUI-I SOUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

-11..

é-via the puufitioner and thcmfem, the

cmly §!3’£’8l.’.32l.’1§ who are and
made applicaticm. their name

asthma name sheuld be ‘.

mbfim. ‘as without a-:’.V: V _ A’

33. Eawawr, new commmeae
rumba-rs in mm and

they have mg mmbers
aumtned a sum of Rs.50.00
ctmducting the Founder’:

W —- ‘msriLata1on can: in than regard is

rapechahie parvsszam fi-am all
5;” }i;:f’$¢;. been invitzed and their mm are
invi’I:at:io:1 card and the fixnctixm is

in a very wand mm. as th’$ trust was
by B. philanthropic person and it is in
fiat tha last 98 wars, 1 do not see any

juafificafinn to stall 1:11.’: fimctinn. ‘I’11m%, thnugh the