Sabira Karim Aged 22 Years vs The University Of Kerala on 23 February, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 5872 of 2010(H)


1. SABIRA KARIM AGED 22 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF

3. THE PRINCIPAL, ALL SAINTS COLLEGE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.S.MANILAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :23/02/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  W.P.(C). No.5872/2010-H
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2010

                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a student of third respondent-College

in M.Com course. The examination for the first year M.Com

commenced on 10/02/2010. The petitioner was denied hall

ticket on the ground that she did not secure minimum marks

for admission to M.Com and she is short of 0.07% of marks

which is necessary for securing admission. The petitioner

has acquired 42.93% in the B.Com degree course. According

to the petitioner, no cut off marks or minimum eligibility

marks for admission to M.Com has been stipulated by the

University.

2. Going by Ext.P3 letter, the college authorities

have communicated to the Controller of Examination that

even though the petitioner has secured only 42.93% of

marks, the admission Board considered it as 43% and granted

admission to M.Com as she belongs to OBC. The petitioner

is aggrieved by the denial of the opportunity to write the

examination and hence, by Ext.P4 she has approached the

Vice Chancellor in the matter.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for

a direction to the Vice Chancellor to take a decision on

W.P.(C). No.5872/2010
-:2:-

Ext.P4 within a time frame and allow the petitioner to

continue the course in the meanwhile.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Standing Counsel for the University.

5. There will be a direction to the Vice Chancellor

of the University to take a decision on Ext.P4 with notice

to the petitioner within a period of one month. In the

meanwhile, the petitioner will be permitted to continue the

course by the third respondent-College.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms
\\TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE