High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Kamalakshi vs Smt Zehra Bai on 3 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Kamalakshi vs Smt Zehra Bai on 3 November, 2009
Author: Manjula Chellur V.Jagannathan
2

= mwwnfi wr munawznsnzwn ruuru &.uuIfI-  KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF XARNATAKA H56}! COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGHCQURI GF i(mNATAKA HBGH COUI

11: um man came? KARKATAKA AT 
mmn ms 'r1-m am my 05* 

ma I-IOll'BLE ms. aumcz   * x 

TEE m:m'31.n ma.  A

AG£1D"s2?'§(EAR_$_._. RIQ_MiCVl'wIYAM
 ztmwm awn,
{REP B¥PA HoLDjER mmmnfl. 51 YEARS
W10 .'3IH?fE$fivI,  smvam, GEORGE
MARKS z2aAz:>,% 
.  3525 602
k   A   % ...co1\mmHAx'r

  .  §7R;§;PEIHDfl{Ai I sHWARA BHAT, ADV.)

 mama am we LATE mm mm
a mm, RIO opp MOYYADDIN PALLI
KEfiR HYCO BAR 33$? FACTWRY

1 i  KAHDATHAPALLI, ICUDROLI

: MANGALORE DK-- 575 033
 T RC'C£;lS§"§7fi '

(BY 8RI.VI8HWARA'TH R IEGDE, ADV.)

_- THI$ 000 I8 FILED UIS 11&12 OF TEE
CGKTEMPI' OF COURT ACT PRAYIKG 'PO Hi'ITIA'I".E



EQEJRT Q? KAKNATAKA H36?! CQUIII $3!' KARNATAKA HiGl'i COIJRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARMAVAKA HIGH COEMT 0? KARNATAKA HIGH COUF

COHTEMP Paocmnnm AGABIST TIE RESPONDENT

FOR DISOBEYING omna Um. 19-07-9005 mam}:
Ix RFA H0.975I2006 vmz ARREXURE(B3AHD
vxoumon 01? THE UHDERTAKIIIG m’m3″%15ea<3-

-nuns-nu-nu

nnsf “<;;<: ct : conmwc+%%on%§*c3§%+r1*e15L
ACCUSED nus DAY,

nm1«~oLwwme;–

9.10.2009 ‘;»;1w%»k!;=*;na==14+1
raisedand

«mm-ant’ %’% ,dmg’ tha mm’ of tha

% iémgmz a mnamzwhn has obtained em

we an as’ tho opazzsén that the

en the eomplamm wmnd be to talea

P°””‘e ‘Ax; cf the pmpmy in mam with due

of }aw in the meution pa-ooeedm which k

3. The learned Counsel appearhn for the
noc:|xaedsnhniuan2I11I2G39avam.dafi1m-yof&n:t

fisionofmepremoeuitlquesflonishandedovertao

4. In via: at’ the above
M pmeadrm-‘ m dwpp°”%%
_ Sd/-

GE

.80 16.: §<.§§§ $03.30 IGMZ .§<Ez~_§ 8 5.300 33..

$_§<zm§ $5 $50.9 I0_I $.5¢2m<z 3.333 £35.. iainirnxifi .2; 3.33.3