High Court Kerala High Court

E.K.Mohammed Iqbal vs State Of Kerala on 18 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
E.K.Mohammed Iqbal vs State Of Kerala on 18 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 5602 of 2008(P)


1. E.K.MOHAMMED IQBAL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (BUILDINGS AND

3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :18/03/2008

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                         ===============
                       W.P.(C) NO. 5602 OF 2008 P
                    ====================

                Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008

                               J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a PWD contractor, who was awarded the work of

construction of building for I.T.I. at Koyalmannam had raised certain

claims and the prayer now made is that his claims should be placed before

the Government Arbitration Committee. It is seen that his request has

found favour with respondents 2, 3 and 4, who have recommended the

same as per Exts. P9 to P12. It is stated that the question as to whether

the claim should be referred to the Government Arbitration Committee is a

matter to be decided by the 1st respondent before whom it is pending and

that a decision in this behalf is awaited.

2. Having regard to the above, I dispose of this writ petition itself

directing that if the matter is pending before the 1st respondent, the 1st

respondent shall decide as to whether the claims raised by the petitioner

are to be referred to the Government Arbitration Committee pursuant to

WPC 5602/08
:2 :

Exts. P9 to P12.

3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st

respondent for compliance and on receipt thereof within six weeks

thereafter, 1st respondent shall take a decision in this matter.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE.

Rp