Madan Mohan vs State Of Raj & Ors on 20 September, 2010

    

 
 
 

 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan
Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
O R D E R
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12431/2010
Madan Mohan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

Date    Of    Order    ::   20/09/2010

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

Mr. Madan Mohan, petitioner in person.
		Petitioner appeared in person and submits that after tender notice was published from the office of Deputy Commissioner (Administration), Commercial Taxes, Bharatpur, in terms of selections made, the petitioner was appointed to work as Man with Machine (Computer Operator) and continuously discharging his duties since October,2009 but the same process has been again initiated by the respondent by notice inviting tender on 11.8.2010 read with 20.8.2010 and some placement agency has been approved by the respondent through which appointments are to be made. Petitioner further submits that when he too has been appointed while going through the same method, there is no justification to appoint fresh applicants through the process which has once been adopted by the respondent pursuant to which the petitioner was given appointment and replacement of the petitioner in the present circumstances is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. Petitioner further submits that in identical CWP-12119/2010 this Court while issuing notices has passed interim order on 06/09/2010.

Issue notice to the respondents along with a copy of this order as to why the petition may not be disposed off at the stage of admission, returnable by four weeks. Notices may be given ‘dasti’, if desired.
In the meanwhile, respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue on the post which he held pursuant to his initial appointment and they are further restrained from replacing the petitioner with the appointments if made in reference to NIT dt.11.8.2010 read with 20.8.2010 till further orders.
List after service along with CWP-12119/2010.

(Ajay Rastogi),J.

VS Shekhawat/-p.2
12431cw10Sep20NtcSty.doc