High Court Kerala High Court

Suo Motu vs State Of Kerala on 4 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Suo Motu vs State Of Kerala on 4 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL.REF.No. 9 of 2008()


1. SUO MOTU
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs


1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SUO MOTU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :04/11/2008

 O R D E R
                          R.BASANT, J.
                       ----------------------
                       Crl.Ref.No.9 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 4th day of November 2008

                              O R D E R

S.T.No.1352/2006 is a prosecution under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act and the same was pending before

the learned J.F.C.M-I, Nadapuram. That case was ordered to be

transferred to the court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram consequent

to conferment of Magisterial powers of this court by notification

under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C. C.C.No.25/08 pending before the

learned J.F.C.M-I, Mannarkkad was a case which was in the

nature of a counter case to the said S.T.No.1352/2006. An

application was filed before this court as Tr.P.Crl.No.41/08

praying that the case and the counter case may be directed to be

tried together. That application was allowed by this court as per

order dated 30/6/2008. C.C.No.25/08 pending before the

learned J.F.C.M-I, Mannarkkad was ordered to be transferred to

the Munsiff Court, Nadapuram where S.T.No.1352/2006 was

pending. After transfer the same was renumbered as

S.T.No.120/08. When the order of transfer was received, the

learned Munsiff, Nadapuram who has now magisterial powers

also has addressed this court through the District and Sessions

Crl.Ref.No.9/08 2

Judge to apprise this court of the practical difficulties involved in

the order of transfer. The learned Officer entertains a doubt

whether he, on whom, magisterial powers has been conferred

under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C, is competent to try cases instituted on

police report. He expresses the further difficulty that there is no

Prosecutor attached to his court and trial of a case instituted on

police report would become difficult and cumbersome before that

court.

2. On receipt of that letter from the Munsiff, Nadapuram

through the District and Sessions Judge as ordered by the Judge in

charge of the District Judge, this reference has been registered.

The registry was directed to put up all the details. Magisterial

powers are seen conferred on the Munsiff, Nadapuram as per

Annexure A order dated 4/3/2005. That order clearly shows that

“the powers of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class” are conferred

on the Munsiff, Nadapuram. It is further reported that powers

under Section 260(1) to conduct summary trials is also conferred

on the Munsiff, Nadapuram.

3. I do not find any merit in the first grievance raised. All

the powers of a Judicial Magistrate of First Class are seen

conferred on the Munsiff, Nadapuram as per Annexure A

notification of the High Court issued under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C.

Crl.Ref.No.9/08 3

Therefore, that Munsiff, who is conferred with Magisterial powers

under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C, is legally competent to dispose of not

only private complaints; but also cases instituted on police reports.

The said doubt expressed by the Munsiff, Nadapuram is hence of

no consequence. Of course, by Annexure B notification, there

was a direction to transfer the old cases under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act and other private complaints from the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Courts of Vadakara and Nadapuram

to the Munsiff Court of Nadapuram. Munsiff was conferred powers

of Judicial Magistrate of First Class under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C as

per Annexure A. Annexure B is a consequent order transferring

cases to such Munsiff who has already been invested with powers

of a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class under Section 11(3)

Cr.P.C. The fact that Annexure B order refers only to transfer of

complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

and other private complaints does not, in any way, militate against

the competence of the Munsiff, Nadapuram under Annexure A

notification to deal with all criminal cases including cases

instituted on police report.

4. But the latter grievance raised does appear to be

correct. This was not brought to the notice of this court when

Tr.P.Crl.No.41/08 was disposed of on 30/6/2008. In the Munsiff’s

Crl.Ref.No.9/08 4

court, Nadapuram which has been conferred Magisterial powers

under Section 11(3) Cr.P.C, there is no Prosecutor attached. If a

police case is transferred to that court, therefore inconvenience

and difficulties may arise. In this view of the matter, I am satisfied

that this reference is to be answered by giving appropriate

directions.

5. In the result, the following directions are issued in this

reference.

i) Both cases – S.T.No.120/08 pending before the Munsiff

Court as also CC.No.25/08 which has been transferred to the

Munsiff Court, Nadapuram from the file of the J.F.C.M,

Mannarkkad (number of the case after re-numbering by the

Munsiff, Nadapuram is not available) shall both be transferred to

the court of the J.F.C.M-Nadapuram who shall dispose of both

cases as expeditiously as possible.

ii) The Munsiff, Nadapuram shall transmit the records to

the learned J.F.C.M-I, Nadapuram forthwith.

6. The learned counsel for both sides are present before

court. They shall direct the parties to appear before the learned

J.F.C.M-I, Nadapuram on 01/12/2008 to continue the proceedings.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

Crl.Ref.No.9/08 5

Crl.Ref.No.9/08 6

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.C.No. of 2008

ORDER

09/07/2008