' IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARHATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA mrrmn THE 17% BA': or APRIL 1' ' " ma HON' am am. JUsTrcESt.A:§_H - T' 1snsc1sLLAm9Us FIRSTAAIWQAL fia;i155:2;'t:;~§~:a,9of} VA BENNEEN; R4' ' VA' 1.
TUKARAM s/0 wsHwANA’TH%._V.:’»
AGE:5O YEARS,’ V
R/O KERo0Rfm.LAGje:, , _
» BHALKI TALI;fK,E3«I-DAR–.DiS3″RiCT,_
(By Sri./Si.:_1Vt §iAD:§i§W.g8s
Appellant
AN D :
1. THESPL LAM: Ar:Qij1Si’I*IoN OFFICER
KA.E{ANJA PROJEC»T, _
, 1; .. . . . . . ..
.2. ‘IfHE_T.F;x;ECUf£I_V£ ENGINEER
‘ ._Di\zisION~-.:~;_o,;3;
B!;{ATAMBE_A_; .
13ii3AR–._’*rALUK AND DISTRICT.
Rcspondénts
__fI”f.ilSfMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS 1311.39 UNDER SECTION
V’ OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1394, TO CALL FOR THE
/EX
MFA Na; 5 i93’*3’07 2
7!.
RELEVANT RECORDS AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL, BY SEW’;-we
ASIDE THAT PART ‘0? THE JUISGMENT AND AwAR_Q.1_%’DA’fE_15’V%« 3
31.7.2006 PASSED BY THE LEARNE13 ‘CIVIL ‘JUDGE: (s.;2v.:1’jzMsi;)–,’_'”_” A’
BHALK! IN L.A.c.No.43/2006 ‘IiHEREB_y7._ ,
INADEQUATE “T COMPENSATION % AND . «.
COMPENSATION (MARKET ‘vALui3)Lz”‘~~V.%AT £0?
RS.1,0Q,00(}/- PER ACRE, IN:-THE £.!éTEE’E§T._OF Lmsrizég AND
EQUITY.
THES MFA !S (}_(V)§r’iEP§ (V} :3}; Pqé TH-IS BAY, THE
COURT MADE
None appeéirswéfor a’p}§)el.J;hnt.
‘()IVl’é”i’-%e§;§-j(:’ tjiug is for compliance of ofiice objections,
subj£3ctVVV’EQ .}cost of R3100] -3 to the R6$’stzy._ Failing
°w?i;ich, stands dismissed without further reference
‘ ” 1
sa/–
JUDGE
mm No. 2&5 ».>’?.:;%7 3
‘TI
Vida order dated 17.4.2009 appeal is dismissed
objections.
As§:sturai9″V’!’5’*””‘ %
_ . gig” may: of iiarnaifiakn,
§ – siicsfii Be!
AA ‘759Ar«?