Yelahanka Merchants vs D V Puttashamaiah on 27 May, 2009

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA. AT BANGALORE
EDATED '1' His THE 2'?"-'1 DAY OF MAY, 2009
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUS'TICE SUBHASH B.ADI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.344~3i2008
BETW BEN :

Yclahanka Merchants   
Finance Company Pvt, Ltd., : '
Bye Pass, B.B.Road,

Yelahanka,

BaI1ga1ore~560 O64.

Reprcscntcxi by its Manager

And G.P.A. Homer,

Smt.Girija,      
W/0 Garudappa   _     ....PE'I'ITIONER

(By Sr.i.V.Srim'vas 8z.V--S:{i;:VVN;S,'t;§1_1:;§3§;1i;§Ii:;ts.::., Advs.)

D.V.Puttash&rfiajah;"-- V 
S/' 0. Lat: Venkatappa, ' .
New agsj:d'a!)out 4'9. years,

   ---------- 
'Bus Stand,

sximvasa 'cpmpsgx,
N€*am'.a.ng'&1a~ Tow'nV,--' "

  Bangalbrc F:11ra_;§..*:*)ist11'ct.  RESPOMENT

(By Sri.Sa1:is11 R.Gi1ji, HCGP.)

  * --3'§fis Cr1.F'etitio1:r. is filed ms, 482 _CR.P.C by the advocate

" '~f.:>1*4;he pctitionar praying to get aside the order dt.31.1.08 in
 V{2.MC_;VNo.1£}OE">8/04 passed by tbs XX Addl. Small Causes Judge
  XVII! ACMM, Bangalore, and the proceedings in C10.
 «~N().1038[O4 be: resisted by providing an opportunity to the

complainant to proceed with the matter.

This petifion coming on for Orders, this day, the Court
maria: the foliowing:



ORDER

By order dated 31.1.2008, learned Magistrate has

(iismissed the complaint for not taking steps.

2. No doubt, this criminal case pertains to

2004 and though the petitioner had taken

summons served on the mspondent,v-“bi}t– same a1e”~notV serveazi

and Court issuezi NBW. despite 1espf:ae;1de”1_:ifT is:

alleged being under Section 13$-e f..Negéfiab1e Act” V

invoiving amount of Rs.2;,89,75Q-ifin’my G’pfiiIiiQ11..–‘§(3I}C more

chance could be given to A.

3. Aocordingi§;f .’iJ3is:=.’ Impugned order

dated 31[,”1%;éi30s.:eis Mate; is remitted to the iearned
Mag’stx’ate’;~.i?etii:iVon.ei’ to take efiective steps. Learned

Magistzrglte is 5139 fiidileet the concerned police to take

3 presence of the accused.

Sd/-

Judge

&