High Court Kerala High Court

R.A.Hajarabi vs Alikunhi on 3 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
R.A.Hajarabi vs Alikunhi on 3 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 2650 of 2010(O)


1. R.A.HAJARABI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ALIKUNHI, S/O.KADAMBOTT KOCHUNNY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ABDUL RAHIMAN,

3. KUNJIBEEVATHU,

4. ALI, S/O.KUZHIKANDATHIL KUNJAMMU,

5. AYISHABI,

6. SMT.JEEY, ADVOCATE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.P.SAMUEL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :03/02/2010

 O R D E R
                     V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                 = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                   W.P.(c).No.2650 of 2010
                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
            Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010

                          JUDGMENT

The writ petitioner along with others had obtained a

decree in O.S.No.140 of 1992 from the Munsiff’s Court,

Kodungallur for fixation of boundary, prohibitory injunction

and recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property.

On 28.6.2005 they filed E.P.No.423 of 2005 for executing

the decree. The 6th respondent herein who is an advocate

practicing at Kodungallur is said to have filed a third party

claim as E.A.No.668 of 2007 in the said E.P. contending that

she had purchased a portion of the property. The petitioner

and others claimed to have filed objections to the said E.A.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the said E.A has not

been taken up for final orders and instead it is being

adjourned ad infinitum . Hence this writ petition for early

disposal of E.A.No.668/2007.

W.P.(c)No.2650 of 2010
2

2. This Court called for a report from the court below.

As per the letter dated 1.2.2010, the learned Munsiff has

reported that the case stands posted to 8.2.2010 and if both

the parties are ready, the petition can be disposed of at the

earliest. The number of adjournments of the said E.A. will

indicate that the claim petitioner was evidently not ready to

get along with the matter. That is not a reason to adjourn

the case to the extreme prejudice of the decree holders.

The court below shall take up E.A.No.668 of 2007 positively

on 8.2.2010 and dispose of the same at the earliest, after

giving both sides an opportunity of being heard. Such

disposal shall be within a period one month of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

sj