High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                   [1]

                 In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh



                                   Date of decision: February 10 ,2009


1.      R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006

        State of Haryana and another                         ..... Appellants
                                         vs
        Jagbir Singh and others                              .... Respondents

2. R. F. A. No. 2642 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

3. R. F. A. No. 2643 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

4. R. F. A. No. 2644 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

5. R. F. A. No. 2645 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

6. R. F. A. No. 2646 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

7. R. F. A. No. 2647 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

8. R. F. A. No. 2648 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [2]

9. R. F. A. No. 2649 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

10. R. F. A. No. 2650 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

11. R. F. A. No. 2651 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

12. R. F. A. No. 2652 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

13. R. F. A. No. 2653 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

14. R. F. A. No. 2654 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

15. R. F. A. No. 2655 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

16. R. F. A. No. 2656 of 2004 (O&M)

Sh. Harke and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

17. R. F. A. No. 8 of 2005 (O&M)

Devinder Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [3]

18. R. F. A. No. 9 of 2005 (O&M)

Surjan ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

19. R. F. A. No. 10 of 2005 (O&M)

Daya Kishan ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

20. R. F. A. No. 11 of 2005 (O&M)

Neelam & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

21. R. F. A. No. 12 of 2005 (O&M)

Sarup Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

22. R. F. A. No. 13 of 2005 (O&M)

Mange Ram & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

23. R. F. A. No. 14 of 2005 (O&M)

Tarif Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

24. R. F. A. No. 15 of 2005 (O&M)

Balbir Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

25. R. F. A. No. 16 of 2005 (O&M)

Chandan Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

26. R. F. A. No. 17 of 2005 (O&M)

Surjan ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [4]

27. R. F. A. No. 18 of 2005 (O&M)

Satbir Singh Rathee & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

28. R. F. A. No. 19 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Lilawati & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

29. R. F. A. No. 20 of 2005 (O&M)

Mukhtiar Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

30. R. F. A. No. 21 of 2005 (O&M)

Lachi Ram ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

31. R. F. A. No. 22 of 2005 (O&M)

Mange Ram ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

32. R. F. A. No. 23 of 2005 (O&M)

Ved Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

33. R. F. A. No. 24 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Bala & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

34. R. F. A. No. 25 of 2005 (O&M)

Komal & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

35. R. F. A. No. 26 of 2005 (O&M)

Sham Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [5]

36. R. F. A. No. 27 of 2005 (O&M)

Jot Ram ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

37. R. F. A. No. 28 of 2005 (O&M)

Ved Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

38. R. F. A. No. 29 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

39. R. F. A. No. 30 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Shiv Devi & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

40. R. F. A. No. 31 of 2005 (O&M)

Jai Ram Rathee ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

41. R. F. A. No. 32 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt.Shanti ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

42. R. F. A. No. 33 of 2005 (O&M)

Dharampal and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

43. R. F. A. No. 34 of 2005 (O&M)

Raj Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

44. R. F. A. No. 35 of 2005 (O&M)

Davinder Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [6]

45. R. F. A. No. 36 of 2005 (O&M)

Surjan ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

46. R. F. A. No. 37 of 2005 (O&M)

Ram Rati and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

47. R. F. A. No. 38 of 2005 (O&M)

Jai Ram Rathee ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

48. R. F. A. No. 39 of 2005(O&M)

Shamlat Panna and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

49. R. F. A. No. 40 of 2005(O&M)

Deep Chand ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

50. R. F. A. No. 41 of 2005(O&M)

Ch.Deep Chand and others ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

51. R. F. A. No. 42 of 2005(O&M)

Jai Bhagwan & another ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

52. R. F. A. No. 43 of 2005(O&M)

Raj Kumar and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

53. R. F. A. No. 44 of 2005(O&M)

Azad Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [7]

54. R. F. A. No. 45 of 2005(O&M)

Laxmi Devi ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

55. R. F. A. No. 46 of 2005(O&M)

Suraj Bhan and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

56. R. F. A. No. 47 of 2005(O&M)

Umed Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

57. R. F. A. No. 48 of 2005(O&M)

Azad Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

58. R. F. A. No. 49 of 2005(O&M)

Dayawanti ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

59. R. F. A. No. 50 of 2005(O&M)

Umed Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

60. R. F. A. No. 51 of 2005(O&M)

Layak Ram and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

61. R. F. A. No. 52 of 2005(O&M)

Smt.Rajenderi ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

62. R. F. A. No. 53 of 2005(O&M)

Jogi Ram and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [8]

63. R. F. A. No. 110 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Sumitra & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

64. R. F. A. No. 111 of 2005 (O&M)

Sultan Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

65. R. F. A. No. 112 of 2005 (O&M)

Ganga Ram & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

66. R. F. A. No. 113 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Prem Rathee & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

67. R. F. A. No. 114 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Kalawati & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

68. R. F. A. No. 115 of 2005(O&M)

Mahender Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

69. R. F. A. No. 116 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Sunita & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

70. R. F. A. No. 117 of 2005 (O&M)

Ran Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

71. R. F. A. No. 118 of 2005 (O&M)

Joginder Singh & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [9]

72. R. F. A. No. 119 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Barfo & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

73. R. F. A. No. 120 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Umed Kaur & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

74. R. F. A. No. 121 of 2005 (O&M)

Mahabir & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

75. R. F. A. No. 143 of 2005 (O&M)

Mukhtiar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

76. R. F. A. No. 144 of 2005(O&M)

Mange Ram & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

77. R. F. A. No. 171 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

78. R. F. A. No. 172 of 2005 (O&M)

M/s Shiv Flour Mills ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

79. R. F. A. No. 173 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhim Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

80. R. F. A. No. 174 of 2005 (O&M)

Attar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [10]

81. R. F. A. No. 175 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Brahmo and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

82. R. F. A. No. 176 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhim Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

83. R. F. A. No. 177 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

84. R. F. A. No. 178 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhim Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

85. R. F. A. No. 179 of 2005 (O&M)

Roop Chand and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

86. R. F. A. No. 180 of 2005 (O&M)

Diwan Chand and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

87. R. F. A. No. 181 of 2005 (O&M)

Chattar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

88. R. F. A. No. 182 of 2005 (O&M)

Ishwar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

89. R. F. A. No. 183 of 2005 (O&M)

Gopi Ram and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [11]

90. R. F. A. No. 184 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhim Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

91. R. F. A. No. 185 of 2005 (O&M)

Jagbir Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

92. R. F. A. No. 186 of 2005 (O&M)

Surat Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

93. R. F. A. No.187 of 2005 (O&M)

Ram Kanwar and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

94. R. F. A. No.188 of 2005 (O&M)

Ch. Charan Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

95. R. F. A. No.189 of 2005 (O&M)

Ram Kumar and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

96. R. F. A. No.190 of 2005 (O&M)

Ishwar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

97. R. F. A. No.191 of 2005 (O&M)

Fakir Chand ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

98. R. F. A. No.192 of 2005 (O&M)

Partap Singh and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [12]

99. R. F. A. No.193 of 2005 (O&M)

Surat Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

100. R. F. A. No.195 of 2005 (O&M)

Sat Narain and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

101. R. F. A. No.196 of 2005 (O&M)

Kanhiya ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

102. R. F. A. No.197 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Harkaur and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

103. R. F. A. No.198 of 2005 (O&M)

Phool Singh and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

104. R. F. A. No.199 of 2005 (O&M)

Pardeep and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

105. R. F. A. No.200 of 2005 (O&M)

Harkaur and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

106. R.F.A. NO. 201 of 2005 (O&M)
Smt. Chanderpati and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

107. R.F.A. NO. 202 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Kumar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [13]

108. R.F.A. NO. 203 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Kanwar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

109. R.F.A. NO. 204 of 2005(O&M)
Mange Ram ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

110. R.F.A. NO. 205 of 2005(O&M)
Mehar Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

111. R.F.A. NO. 206 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Phal ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

112. R.F.A. NO. 207 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Phal ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

113. R.F.A. NO. 208 of 2005(O&M)
Phool Singh and another ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

114. R.F.A. NO. 209 of 2005(O&M)
Smt. Chandro Devi ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

115. R.F.A. NO. 210 of 2005(O&M)
Bijender Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [14]

116. R.F.A. NO. 211 of 2005(O&M)
Pardeep and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

117. R.F.A. NO. 212 of 2005(O&M)
Daulat Ram ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

118. R.F.A. NO. 213 of 2005(O&M)
Ishwar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

119. R.F.A. NO. 214 of 2005(O&M)
Smt. Brahmo Devi and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

120. R.F.A. NO. 215 of 2005(O&M)
Kamlesh ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

121. R. F. A. No. 216 of 2005(O&M)

Ram Kanwar & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

122. R. F. A. No. 217 of 2005(O&M)

Lali Devi & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

123. R. F. A. No. 218 of 2005 (O&M)

Bakhtawar ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [15]

124. R. F. A. No. 219 of 2005(O&M)

Raj Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

125. R. F. A. No. 220 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Chandro Devi & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others
…. Respondents

126. R. F. A. No. 221 of 2005(O&M)

Deepak Kumar & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

127. R. F. A. No. 222 of 2005(O&M)

Ved Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

128. R. F. A. No. 223 of 2005 (O&M)

Bijender Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

129. R. F. A. No. 224 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhim Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

130. R. F. A. No. 231 of 2005 (O&M)

Raj Kumar & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

131. R. F. A. No. 274 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Mohar Kaur & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

132. R. F. A. No. 275 of 2005(O&M)

Bhim Singh & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [16]

133. R. F. A. No. 276 of 2005(O&M)

Maha Singh Rathee & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

134. R. F. A. No. 277 of 2005 (O&M)

Maha Singh Rathee & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

135. R. F. A. No. 283 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Angoori & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

136. R. F. A. No. 284 of 2005(O&M)

Lachi Ram ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

137. R. F. A. No. 285 of 2005(O&M)

Bhim Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

138. R. F. A. No. 286 of 2005(O&M)

Jaipal Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

139. R. F. A. No. 287 of 2005(O&M)

Puran Singh & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

140. R. F. A. No. 288 of 2005(O&M)

Daya Nand ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

141. R. F. A. No. 289 of 2005(O&M)

Balbir Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [17]

142. R.F.A. NO. 347 of 2005(O&M)
Attar Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

143. R.F.A. NO. 349 of 2005(O&M)
Karan Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

144. R.F.A. NO. 393 of 2005(O&M)
Umed Singh and another ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

145. R.F.A. NO. 394 of 2005(O&M)
Ishwar Dass ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

146. R.F.A. NO. 395 of 2005(O&M)
Surender Pal Singh ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

147. R.F.A. NO. 396 of 2005(O&M)
Maha Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

148. R.F.A. NO. 397 of 2005(O&M)
Premwati ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

149. R.F.A. NO. 398 of 2005(O&M)
Premwati ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [18]

150. R.F.A. NO. 399 of 2005(O&M)
Surinder Kumar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

151. R.F.A. NO. 400 of 2005(O&M)
Surinder Kumar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

152. R.F.A. NO. 401 of 2005(O&M)
Maha Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

153. R.F.A. NO. 402 of 2005(O&M)
Amar Singh and another ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

154. R.F.A. NO. 403 of 2005(O&M)
Phool Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

155. R.F.A. NO. 404 of 2005(O&M)
Shanti Devi ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

156. R.F.A. NO. 405 of 2005(O&M)
Samunder Singh ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

157. R.F.A. NO. 406 of 2005(O&M)
Dayawanti ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [19]

158. R.F.A. NO. 407 of 2005(O&M)
Rohit Kumar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

159. R.F.A. NO. 408 of 2005(O&M)
Surinder Kumar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

160. R.F.A. NO. 409 of 2005(O&M)
Ravinder and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

161. R.F.A. NO. 410 of 2005(O&M)
Phool Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

162. R.F.A. NO. 411 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Pal ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

163. R.F.A. NO. 412 of 2005(O&M)
Rahul Kumar Singh ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

164. R.F.A. NO. 413 of 2005(O&M)
Smt. Satto Devi ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

165. R.F.A. NO. 414 of 2005(O&M)
Laxmi Narain and another ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [20]

166. R.F.A. NO. 415 of 2005(O&M)
Ram Pyari and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

167. R.F.A. NO. 416 of 2005(O&M)
Surinder Kumar ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

168. R.F.A. NO. 452 of 2005(O&M)

Rishal Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

169. R.F.A. NO. 453 of 2005(O&M)

Anand Kumar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

170. R.F.A. NO. 454 of 2005(O&M)

Sat Narain and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

171. R.F.A. NO. 455 of 2005(O&M)

Risal Singh & another ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

172. R.F.A. NO. 488 of 2005(O&M)

Raj Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [21]

173. R.F.A. NO. 489 of 2005(O&M)

Ram Kanwar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

174. R.F.A. NO. 490 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Barahmo Devi and others …Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

175. R.F.A. NO. 491 of 2005(O&M)

Ramesh Kumar and another ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

1765. R.F.A. NO. 492 of 2005(O&M)

Ram Kumar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

177. R.F.A. NO. 493 of 2005(O&M)

Gomati and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

178. R.F.A. NO. 494 of 2005(O&M)

Saraswati and others .. Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

179. R.F.A. NO. 496 of 2005(O&M)

Smt. Gomati and others … Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [22]

180. R.F.A. NO. 508 of 2005(O&M)

Ram Kanwar and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

181. R.F.A. NO. 509 of 2005(O&M)

Jawala Parshad and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

182. R.F.A. NO. 517 of 2005(O&M)

Om Parkash ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

183. R.F.A. NO. 550 of 2005(O&M)

Attar Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

184. R.F.A. NO. 551 of 2005(O&M)

Partap Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

185. R.F.A. NO. 552 of 2005(O&M)

Omwati and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

186. R.F.A. NO. 553 of 2005(O&M)

Ram Kishan ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [23]

187. R.F.A. NO. 554 of 2005(O&M)

Kishan Chand and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

188. R.F.A. NO. 555 of 2005(O&M)

Anoop Singh and others ….Appellants

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

189. R.F.A. NO. 576 of 2005(O&M)

Attar Singh ….Appellant

Vs

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

190. R. F. A. No. 605 of 2005 (O&M)

Paras Ram (deceased) through LRs and others .. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

191. R. F. A. No. 610 of 2005 (O&M)

Hoshiyar Singh Rathi and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

192. R. F. A. No. 611 of 2005 (O&M)

Inder Singh and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

193. R. F. A. No. 612 of 2005 (O&M)

Parshotam Dass and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

194. R. F. A. No. 613 of 2005(O&M)

Smt.Shanti and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [24]

195. R. F. A. No. 654 of 2005(O&M)

Maman Singh and others … Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

196. R. F. A. No. 655 of 2005 (O&M)

Devender and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

197. R. F. A. No. 656 of 2005 (O&M)

Usha Devi and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

198. R. F. A. No. 657 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash & others …. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

199. R. F. A. No. 658 of 2005 (O&M)

Rajbir Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

200. R. F. A. No. 659 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

201. R. F. A. No. 660 of 2005(O&M)

Shri Krishan and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

202. R.F.A. No. 661 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhup Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

203. R.F.A. No. 662 of 2005 (O&M)

Baljit Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [25]

204. R.F.A. No. 663 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Nihalo Devi & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

205. R.F.A. No. 664 of 2005 (O&M)

Sher Singh & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

206. R.F.A. No. 665 of 2005 (O&M)

Ram Pat & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

207. R.F.A. No. 666 of 2005 (O&M)

Sarto Devi & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

208. R.F.A. No. 667 of 2005 (O&M)

Kuldeep & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

209. R.F.A. No. 668 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Dharmo & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

210. R.F.A. No. 669 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Laxmi Devi ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

211. R.F.A. No. 670 of 2005 (O&M)

Raghbir Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

212. R.F.A. No. 671 of 2005 (O&M)

Surender Kumar @ Surender ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [26]

213. R.F.A. No. 672 of 2005 (O&M)

Mrs. Prajakta Sita Ram Kanitkor ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

214. R.F.A. No. 673 of 2005 (O&M)

Sanjay & others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

215. R.F.A. No. 684 of 2005 (O&M)

Jag Rup Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

216. R.F.A. No. 685 of 2005 (O&M)

Attar Singh & another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

217 R.F.A. No. 686 of 2005 (O&M)

Om Parkash ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

218. R.F.A. No. 687 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Dankar ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

219. R.F.A. No. 688 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Vidyawati ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana & others …. Respondents

220. R.F.A. No. 707 of 2005 (O&M)

Charan Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

221. R.F.A. No. 708 of 2005 (O&M)

Mange Ram ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [27]

222 R.F.A. No. 709 of 2005 (O&M)

Narender Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

223. R.F.A. No. 710 of 2005 (O&M)

Pardeep Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and another …. Respondents

224. R.F.A. No. 719 of 2005 (O&M)

Jagbir and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

225. R.F.A. No. 720 of 2005 (O&M)

Sube Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

226. R.F.A. No. 754 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhoop Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and another …. Respondents

227. R.F.A. No. 755 of 2005 (O&M)

Raj Kumar and others … Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

228. R.F.A. No. 760 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Phool Devi and others … Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

229. R.F.A. No. 776 of 2005 (O&M)

Bimla and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

230. R.F.A. No. 777 of 2005 (O&M)

Suresh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [28]

231. R. F. A. No.958 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Shakuntla Rani @ Shakuntla ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and another …. Respondents

232. R. F. A. No.1119 of 2005 (O&M)

Mahabir and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

233. R. F. A. No.1120 of 2005 (O&M)

Ajit Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

234. R. F. A. No.1203 of 2005 (O&M)

Shanti Devi and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

235. R. F. A. No.1204 of 2005 (O&M)

Rajinder Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

236. R. F. A. No.1205 of 2005 (O&M)

Smt. Sharbati and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

237. R. F. A. No.1206 of 2005 (O&M)

Raj Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

238. R. F. A. No.1207 of 2005 (O&M)

Bhagwan Singh and others … Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

239. R. F. A. No.1293 of 2005 (O&M)

Attar Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [29]

240. R. F. A. No.1294 of 2005 (O&M)

Ran Singh and another ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

241. R. F. A. No.1295 of 2005 (O&M)

Ran Singh and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

242. R. F. A. No.1296 of 2005 (O&M)

Karan Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

243. R. F. A. No.1402 of 2005 (O&M)

Asha Devi and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

244. R. F. A. No.1745 of 2005 (O&M)

Raghubir Singh ….. Appellant
vs
State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

245. R. F. A. No.3046 of 2005 (O&M)

Raj Bala and others ….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana and another …. Respondents

246. R. F. A. No.3223 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh and others …. Respondents

247. R. F. A. No.3224 of 2005 (O &M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Sumitra and others …. Respondents

248. R. F. A. No.3225 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Wazir Singh and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [30]

249.` R. F. A. No.3226 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Kanwar and others …. Respondents

250. R. F. A. No.3227 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ved Singh and another …. Respondents

251. R. F. A. No.3228 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Phal and another …. Respondents

252 R. F. A. No.3229 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Jogi Ram and others …. Respondents

253. R. F. A. No.3230 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ved Singh and another …. Respondents

254. R. F. A. No.3231 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh and others …. Respondents

255. R. F. A. No.3232 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Shri Harke and others …. Respondents

256. R. F. A. No.3233 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Amar Singh and others …. Respondents

257. R. F. A. No.3234 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Suresh and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [31]

258. R. F. A. No.3235 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Kasturi and others …. Respondents

259. R. F. A. No.3236 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Chattar Singh and another …. Respondents

260. R. F. A. No.3237 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Daulat Ram and another …. Respondents

261. R. F. A. No.3238 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash Aggarwal and others ….Respondents

262. R.F.A. No. 3239 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Sardara & another …. Respondents

263. R.F.A. No. 3240 of 2005 (O&M)
State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ram Phal & another …. Respondents

264. R.F.A. No. 3241 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ishwar Singh & another …. Respondents

265. R.F.A. No. 3242 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [32]

266. R.F.A. No. 3243 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Rajenderi & another …. Respondents

267. R.F.A. No. 3244 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Luxmi Devi & another …. Respondents

268. R.F.A. No. 3245 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Phool Singh & others …. Respondents

269. R.F.A. No. 3246 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Devinder Singh & others …. Respondents

270. R.F.A. No. 3247 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Surjan & another …. Respondents

271. R.F.A. No. 3248 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash & others …. Respondents

272. R.F.A. No. 3249 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Mahender Singh & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [33]

273. R.F.A. No. 3250 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt.. Chandro & another …. Respondents

274. R.F.A. No. 3251 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Murli Manohar Mandir & another …. Respondents

275. R.F.A. No.3252 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Manglo & others …. Respondents

276. R.F.A. No. 3253 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ram Narain & others …. Respondents

277. R.F.A. No. 3254 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Harke & others …. Respondents

278. R.F.A. No. 3255 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Jai Bhagwan & others …. Respondents

279. R.F.A. No. 3256 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt.. Premwati & another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [34]

280. R.F.A. No. 3257 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Raj Singh & others …. Respondents

281. R.F.A. No. 3258 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Dharam Pal & others …. Respondents

282. R.F.A. No. 3259 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Attar Singh & another …. Respondents

283. R.F.A. No. 3260 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Raghbir Singh & another …. Respondents

284. R.F.A. No. 3261 of 2005 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash & others …. Respondents

285. R.F.A. No. 3295 of 2005 (O&M)

Mukhtiar Singh & others
….. Appellants
vs
State of Haryana & others
…. Respondents

286. R. F. A. No. 2 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Premwati and another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [35]

287. R.F.A. NO.4 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another …..Appellants
vs
Dayanand and another …..Respondents

288. R.F.A. No. 5 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Dayawati and another …….Respondents

289. R.F.A. No. 7 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Umed Singh and others ……Respondents

290. R.F.A. No. 8 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Fakir Chand and another ……Respondents

291. R.F.A. No.19 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Shri Harke and others ……Respondents

292. R.F.A. No.23 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ram Kanwar and others ……Respondents

293. R.F.A. No.26 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Shri Harke and others ……Respondents

294. R.F.A. No.27 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Raj Singh and another ……Respondents

295. R.F.A. No.28 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ram Mehar and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [36]

296. R.F.A. No.31 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Mange Ram and others ……Respondents

297. R.F.A. No.32 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ram Mehar and another ……Respondents

298. R.F.A. No.33 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Om Parkash and another ……Respondents

299. R.F.A. No.35 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Surender and others ……Respondents

300. R.F.A. No.37 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ram Kumar and others ……Respondents

301. R.F.A. No.38 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Mukhtiar Singh and others ……Respondents

302. R.F.A. No.39 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Shanti and another ……Respondents

303. R.F.A. No.41 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Dalel Singh and others ……Respondents

304. R.F.A. No.42 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Lachi Ram and another ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [37]

305. R.F.A. No.44 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Jai Singh and others ……Respondents

306. R.F.A. No.45 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Bijender Singh and others ……Respondents

307. R.F.A. No. 46 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Sarto Devi & others …. Respondents

308. R.F.A. No. 47 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Jai Ram Rathee & another …. Respondents

309. R.F.A. No. 48 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Inder Singh & others …. Respondents

310. R.F.A. No. 49 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Rameshwar & another …. Respondents

311. R.F.A. No. 50 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Harke & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [38]

312. R.F.A. No. 51 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Daya Kishan & another …. Respondents

313. R.F.A. No. 52 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Shri Harke & others …. Respondents

314. R.F.A. No. 54 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ram Kumar & others …. Respondents

315. R.F.A. No. 55 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Partap Singh & others …. Respondents

316. R.F.A. No. 57 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Sham Singh & others …. Respondents

317. R.F.A. No. 58 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

318. R.F.A. No. 59 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Raj Kumar & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [39]

319. R.F.A. No. 60 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Sharbati & others …. Respondents

320. R.F.A. No. 61 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ishwar Singh & another …. Respondents

321. R.F.A. No. 62 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Surender & another …. Respondents

322. R.F.A. No. 63 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Suraj Bhan & another …. Respondents

323. R.F.A. No. 64 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Shri Harke & others …. Respondents

324. R.F.A. No. 65 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Mohar Kaur & others …. Respondents

325. R.F.A. No. 66 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Lali Devi & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [40]

326. R.F.A. No. 67 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Lachi Ram & another …. Respondents

327. R.F.A. No. 68 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Ved Singh & others …. Respondents

328. R.F.A. No. 83 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another

….. Appellants
vs
Daulat Ram & another …. Respondents

329. R. F. A. No. 84 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh & others …. Respondents

330. R. F. A. No. 85 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Risal Singh & others …. Respondents

331. R. F. A. No. 92 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
S.V. Konitkar & another …. Respondents

332. R. F. A. No. 95 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

333. R. F. A. No. 114 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Shanti & another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [41]

334. R. F. A. No. 115 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Pyari & others …. Respondents

335. R. F. A. No. 116 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mukhtiar Singh & others …. Respondents

336. R. F. A. No. 117 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Jaipal Singh & others …. Respondents

337. R. F. A. No. 171 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mehar Singh & others …. Respondents

338. R. F. A. No. 172 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Lakhi Ram & others …. Respondents

339. R. F. A. No. 174 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Puran Singh & others …. Respondents

340. R. F. A. No. 175 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mukhtiar Singh & another …. Respondents

341. R. F. A. No. 181 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Maha Singh & others …. Respondents

342. R. F. A. No. 182 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [42]

343. R. F. A. No. 184 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

344. R. F. A. No. 185 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

345. R. F. A. No. 186 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Harkaur & others …. Respondents

346. R. F. A. No. 189 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Raghubir Singh & another …. Respondents

347. R. F. A. No. 190 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

348. R. F. A. No. 191 of 2006(O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Harke & others …. Respondents

349. R.F.A. No.259 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Surjan and another ……Respondents

350. R.F.A. No.260 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
M/s Shiv Flour Mills and another ……Respondents

351. R.F.A. No.261 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Mahabir and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [43]

352. R.F.A. No.264 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Indraj and others ……Respondents

353. R.F.A. No.265 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Raj Singh and others ……Respondents

354. R.F.A. No.266 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Surat Singh and another ……Respondents

355. R.F.A. No.267 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ramrati and others ……Respondents

356. R.F.A. No.269 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Kishan Chand and others ……Respondents

357. R.F.A. No.270 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Layak Ram and others ……Respondents

358. R.F.A. No.271 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Surender Kumar and another ……Respondents

359. R.F.A. No.273 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Neelam and others ……Respondents

360. R.F.A. No.274 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Brahno Devi and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [44]

361. R.F.A. No.277 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ishwar Dass and another ……Respondents

362. R.F.A. No.278 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Brahmo Devi and others ……Respondents

363. R.F.A. No.280 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh and others ……Respondents

364. R.F.A. No.283 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Narender Singh Rathi and others ……Respondents

365. R.F.A. No.285 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Sanjay and others ……Respondents

366. R.F.A. No.286 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Raj Singh and others ……Respondents

367. R.F.A. No.287 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Azad Singh and another ……Respondents

368. R.F.A. No.289 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Leelawati and others ……Respondents

369. R.F.A. No.291 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Parshotam Dass and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [45]

370. R.F.A. No.294 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Karan Singh and others ……Respondents

371. R.F.A. No.342 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Kanhiya and another ……Respondents

372. R.F.A. No.343 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Suraj Bhan and others ……Respondents

373. R.F.A. No.344 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ajit Singh and another ……Respondents

374. R.F.A. No.345 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ran Singh and others ……Respondents

375. R. F. A. No.346 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Karan Singh and another …. Respondents

376. R. F. A. No.389 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Rohit Kumar and another …. Respondents

377. R. F. A. No.390 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash and another …. Respondents

378. R. F. A. No.391 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Rahul Kumar Singh and another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [46]

379. R. F. A. No.392 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Pardeep and others …. Respondents

380. R. F. A. No.394 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Tarif Singh and another …. Respondents

381. R. F. A. No.395 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Bakhtawar and another …. Respondents

382. R. F. A. No.396 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Samunder Singh and another …. Respondents

383. R. F. A. No.398 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Charan Singh and another …. Respondents

384. R. F. A. No.399 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Dayawanti and another …. Respondents

385. R. F. A. No.400 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Dharmo and others …. Respondents

386. R. F. A. No.402 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Mange Ram and another …. Respondents

387. R. F. A. No.403 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Rampat and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [47]

388. R. F. A. No.407 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Umed Singh and others …. Respondents

389. R. F. A. No.447 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Kamlesh and another …. Respondents

390. R. F. A. No.448 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Chandro Devi and others …. Respondents

391. R. F. A. No.449 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Nihalo Devi and others …. Respondents

392. R. F. A. No.452 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Surinder Kumar and another …. Respondents

393. R. F. A. No.453 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Sultan Singh and others …. Respondents

394. R. F. A. No.454 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ran Singh and others …. Respondents

395. R. F. A. No.455 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Phul Singh @ Phule and others …. Respondents

396. R. F. A. No.456 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Laxmi Devi and another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [48]

397. R. F. A. No.458 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Mange Ram and others …. Respondents

398. R. F. A. No.459 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Partap Singh and others …. Respondents

399. R. F. A. No.460 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhup Singh and another …. Respondents

400. R. F. A. No. 461 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Charan Singh & another …. Respondents

401. R.F.A. No. 462 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh & others …. Respondents

402. R.F.A. No. 464 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram pal & another …. Respondents

403. R.F.A. No. 465 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Shanti Devi & another …. Respondents

404. R.F.A. No. 466 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Umed Singh & others …. Respondents

405. R.F.A. No. 467 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Sat Narain & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [49]

406. R.F.A. No. 469 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Davinder Singh & others …. Respondents

407. R.F.A. No. 472 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Deepak Kumar & others …. Respondents

408. R.F.A. No. 473 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mange Ram & another …. Respondents

409. R.F.A. No. 474 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Roop Chand & others …. Respondents

410. R.F.A. No. 475 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Rishal Singh & others …. Respondents

411. R.F.A. No. 476 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Surinder Kumar & another …. Respondents

412. R.F.A. No. 536 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mahabir Singh & others …. Respondents

413. R.F.A. No. 537 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Kumar & others …. Respondents

414. R.F.A. No. 722 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Pardeep & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [50]

415. R.F.A. No. 723 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Surinder Pal Singh & another …. Respondents

416. R.F.A. No. 724 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Hoshiar Singh Rathi & others …. Respondents

417. R.F.A. No. 729 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Laxmi Narain & others …. Respondents

418. R.F.A. No. 730 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Kanwar & others …. Respondents

419. R.F.A. No. 731 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Phal & another …. Respondents

420. R.F.A. No. 732 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Deep Chand & another …. Respondents

421. R.F.A. No. 734 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Mange Ram & others …. Respondents

422. R. F. A. No. 738 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Paras Ram and others …. Respondents

423. R. F. A. No. 739 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Surjan and another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [51]

424. R. F. A. No. 740 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Maha Singh and others …. Respondents

425. R. F. A. No. 742 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Dalip Singh and another …. Respondents

426. R. F. A. No. 743 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Attar Singh and another …. Respondents

427. R. F. A. No. 745 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Chandan Singh and another …. Respondents

428. R.F.A. No.746 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Angoori and others ……Respondents

429. R.F.A. No.752 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Sh. Harke and others ……Respondents

430. R.F.A. No.753 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Baljit Singh and others ……Respondents

431. R.F.A. No.754 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Chanderpati and others ……Respondents

432. R.F.A. No.762 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [52]

433. R.F.A. No.763 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Maman Singh and another ……Respondents

434. R.F.A. No.764 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Phool Singh and others ……Respondents

435. R.F.A. No.766 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Dhan Kaur and others ……Respondents

436. R.F.A. No.768 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Jai Ram and another ……Respondents

437. R.F.A. No.773 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Attar Singh and others ……Respondents

438. R.F.A. No.774 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Omwati and others ……Respondents

439. R.F.A. No.775 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Vidawati and another ……Respondents

440. R. F. A. No. 776 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Dan Kaur and another …. Respondents

441. R. F. A. No. 779 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Bala and others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [53]

442. R. F. A. No. 781 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Attar Singh and others …. Respondents

443. R. F. A. No. 783 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Ram Kanwar and others …. Respondents

444. R. F. A. No. 784 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Sube Singh and another …. Respondents

445. R. F. A. No. 785 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants
vs
Bijender Singh and others …. Respondents

446. R.F.A. No. 812 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Phool Singh & others …. Respondents

447. R.F.A. No. 827 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ganga Ram & others …. Respondents

448. R.F.A. No. 828 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Bhim Singh & others …. Respondents

449. R.F.A. No. 844 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Chandrawati & others …. Respondents

450. R.F.A. No. 845 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Shanti Devi & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [54]

451. R.F.A. No. 969 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Sahi Ram & others …. Respondents

452. R.F.A. No. 1020 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Gopi Ram & others …. Respondents

453. R.F.A. No. 1021 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Om Parkash & another …. Respondents

454. R.F.A. No. 1022 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Smt. Satto & another …. Respondents

455. R.F.A. No. 1023 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ranbir Singh & others …. Respondents

456. R.F.A. No. 1024 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Indraj & others …. Respondents

457. R.F.A. No. 1025 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ravinder & others …. Respondents

458. R.F.A. No. 1026 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Jawala Parshad & others …. Respondents

459. R.F.A. No. 1028 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Ch. Deep Chand & others …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [55]

460. R.F.A. No. 1029 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Shamsher Singh & others …. Respondents

461. R.F.A. No. 1105 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Dalbir Singh & others …. Respondents

462. R.F.A. No. 1106 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Roop Chand & others …. Respondents

463. R.F.A. No. 1107 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Diwan Chand & others …. Respondents

464. R.F.A. No. 1108 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Rajinder Singh & another …. Respondents

465. R.F.A. No. 1109 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Phool Singh & others …. Respondents

466. R.F.A. No. 1110 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Jot Ram & another …. Respondents

467. R.F.A. No. 1119 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Shri Krishan & others …. Respondents

468. R.F.A. No. 1122 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Sh. Mange Ram & another …. Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [56]

469. R.F.A. No. 1126 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana & another ….. Appellants
vs
Komal & others …. Respondents

470. R.F.A. No.1127 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Umed Singh and another ……Respondents

471. R.F.A. No.1130 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Sh. Attar Singh and others ……Respondents

472. R.F.A. No.1131 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Azad Singh and another ……Respondents

473. R.F.A. No.1132 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Ishwar Singh and another ……Respondents

474. R.F.A. No.1133 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Satbir Singh Rathee and others ……Respondents

475. R.F.A. No.1134 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Sarup Singh and others ……Respondents

476. R.F.A. No.1136 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Raj Kumar and others ……Respondents

477. R.F.A. No.1137 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Mahiender Singh and others ……Respondents
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [57]

478. R.F.A. No.1138 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Brahmo and others ……Respondents

479. R.F.A. No.1174 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Kuldeep Singh and another ……Respondents

480. R.F.A. No.1212 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Balbir Singh and another ……Respondents

481. R.F.A. No.1221 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Bhup Singh and others ……Respondents

482. R.F.A. No.1334 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Shiv Devi and others ……Respondents

483. R.F.A. No.1435 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Surat Singh and another ……Respondents

484. R.F.A. No.3239 of 2006 (O&M)

State of Haryana and another ……Appellants
vs
Smt. Brahno Devi and others ……Respondents

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

Present: Shri Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

S/Shri R.A. Yadav, R. S. Dalal, G.S.Hooda, Mohnish Sharma
for Narender Hooda, Sandeep K. Sharma, Amit Shivrain for
M.P.S.Mann and S.S.Virk, Advocates for the land owners.

R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [58]

Shri Raman Gaur, Advocate for HUDA.

Shri Deepak Balyan, Advocate.

Rajesh Bindal J.

This order shall dispose of a bunch of 484 appeals, as the same arise
out of a common acquisition.

R.F.A. Nos. 3223 to 3261 of 2005, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28,
31 to 33, 35, 37 to 39, 41, 42, 44 to 52, 54, 55, 57 to 68, 83 to 85, 92, 95, 114 to
117, 171, 172, 174, 175, 181, 182, 184, 185, 186, 189, 190, 191, 259, 260, 261,
264, 265, 266, 267, 269, 270, 271, 273, 274, 277, 278, 280, 283, 285, 286, 287,
289, 291, 294, 342 to 346, 389 to 392, 394 to 396, 398 to 400, 402, 403, 407, 447,
448, 449, 452 to 456, 458 to 462, 464 to 467, 469, 472 to 476, 536, 537, 722 to
724, 729 to 732, 734, 738 to 740, 742, 743, 745, 746, 752 to 754, 762 to 764, 766,
768, 773 to 776, 779, 781, 783 to 785, 812, 827, 828, 844, 845, 969, 1020 to
1026, 1028, 1029, 1105 to 1110, 1119, 1122, 1126, 1127, 1130 to 1134, 1136 to
1138, 1174, 1212, 1221, 1334, 1435 and 3239 of 2006 by the State of Haryana
seeking reduction of the amount of compensation awarded to the land owners for
the acquired land.

R.F.A. Nos. 2642 to 2656 of 2004, 8 to 53, 110 to 121, 143, 144, 171
to 193, 195 to 224, 231, 274 to 277, 283 to 289, 347, 349, 393 to 416, 452 to 455,
488 to 494, 496, 508, 509, 517, 550 to 555, 576, 605, 610 to 613, 654 to 673, 684
to 688, 707 to 710, 719, 720, 754, 755, 760, 776, 777, 958, 1119, 1120, 1203 to
1207, 1293 to 1296, 1402, 1745, 3046 and 3295 of 2005, have been filed by the
land owners seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.

The facts have been extracted from R. F. A. No. 1 of 2006.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide
notification dated 12.5.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act,
1894 (for short, “the Act”), acquired the land within the revenue estate of
Bahadurgarh, Hadbast No. 38, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, for
development and utilisation as residential and commercial area in Sector-9 and 9-
A, Bahadurgarh. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the
land at Rs. 6 lacs per acre for the land situated on Bahadurgarh-Delhi road upto
the depth of 3 acres, Rs. 4 lacs per acre for the land situated on Bahadurgarh-
Najafgarh road upto the depth of 3 acres, Rs. 2.50 lacs per acre for nehri and chahi
and Rs. 2 lacs per acre for barani and other kinds of land. The
landowners/claimants feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation
awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [59]

Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land by
granting Rs. 50,000/- per acre increase for each category. It is this award of the
learned Reference Court which is impugned in the present set of appeals.

Learned counsel for the landowners referred to site plan Ex. R-66
placed on record which shows the acquisition boundaries. The land is shown to be
located on one side of the National Highway No. 10 Delhi-Hisar and on the other
side, the land abuts the road, namely, Bahadurgarh-Najafgarh Road. Another site
plan, Ex. P-29 was referred to show that the acquired land is quite close to Delhi
border. As far as determination of fair value of the acquired land is concerned,
learned counsel for the landowners primarily relied upon sale-deeds and allotment
letters, Ex. P-12, P-13, P-14, P-30, P-31, P-41 and P-43. In addition to these
documents, Ex. P-28 was also relied upon i.e. an award of the Land Acquisition
Collector pertaining to the land of a small portion of land falling in Sector-9A
which was subsequently acquired vide notification under Section 4 of the Act
issued on 2.12.1998.

As far as the sale-deeds are concerned, it was submitted that vide
sale-deed Ex. P-12, a big chunk of land measuring 8 kanals 7½ marlas falling in
Village Hassanpur was sold vide sale-deed dated 22.4.1993 for a sale
consideration of Rs. 20,26,800/- i.e. @ Rs. 400/- per square yard. This land is
stated to be about 3½ acres away from the National-Highway. So far as the sale-
deed, Ex. P-13 is concerned, it was submitted that vide sale-deed dated 28.2.1989,
land measuring 2550 square yards was sold for Rs. 5,87,500/- at an average price
of Rs. 230/- per square yard. This piece of land is located on Jhajjar road.
Referring to the aforesaid sale-deed, it was submitted that when the value of the
land near Bahadurgarh in the year 1989 was Rs. 230/- per square yard, it cannot be
lesser in the year 1995 when the present land was acquired. Another sale-deed, Ex.
P-14 dated 23.5.1989 is referred to whereby 410 square yards land was sold for Rs.
80,000/- at an average price of Rs. 195/- per square yard. This portion of land is
stated to be located quite close to the acquisition boundary towards the abadi area.

Ex. P-41, is another sale-deed dated 6.10.1994 which is relied upon
whereby 100 square yards of land was sold for Rs. 40,000/- at an average price of
Rs. 400/- per square yard. Though the sale-deed is not located on any of the site
plan, however, khasra number which is located on Ex. R-66 shows its location
towards the abadi area from the acquired land. Vide sale deed Ex. P-43 dated
15.3.1995, 30 square yards of land was sold for Rs. 12,000/- at an average price of
Rs. 400/- per square yard. This portion of land is pertaining to Village Parnala and
the khasra number which is evident from site plan, Ex. R-66, is located on the
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [60]

main National-Highway No. 10 Delhi-Hisar Road.

In addition to this, reliance was placed upon Ex. P-28, the award
dated 13.7.2001, whereby for small portion of land acquired subsequently vide
notification dated 2.12.1998, the Land Acquisition Collector determined the value
of the acquired land therein at Rs. 9,50,000/- per acre. This land is forming part of
Sectors 9/9A, Bahadurgarh. Ex. P-30 is a letter of intent issued by HUDA in
favour of Indian Oil Corporation whereby an undeveloped big chunk of land was
sold for Rs. 2,97,30,200/- at an average price of Rs. 1486.51 square yard. This
portion of land is located in Sector-7, Bahadurgarh which is on the other side of
the city abutting the National Highway towards Rohtak side whereas the acquired
land is towards Delhi side. Ex. P-51 is the brochure of Haryana Urban
Development Authority for sale of plots in Sectors 9 and 9A, for the development
of which the present land was acquired, was also referred to where the value of
plots of different sizes was fixed ranging from Rs. 1733/- to Rs. 2118/- per square
yard.

In addition to the documentary evidence produced on record, learned
counsel for the landowners have also referred to the oral evidence led by them in
the form of statements of PW6 Jagdish Chander, Junior Engineer, Municipal
Committee, Bahadurgarh and PW10 Surinder Singh Rathi, Advocate of
Bahadugarh wherein the location as well as the potentiality was stated. The land is
sandwiched between the already existing Bahadurgarh town and Delhi Border. It
has great potential for being developed as industrial and commercial purposes for
the reason that it’s being part of National Capital Region and close to Delhi. It is
further submitted that the learned court below had not considered the evidence led
by the landowners and merely applied thumb rule by granting increased
compensation for all categories of land at Rs. 50,000/- each. If the evidence led by
the landowners is considered in the light of settled principles for determination of
value of the land, it has to be assessed at much more rates. It was further argued
that the categorisation of the land into nehri and barani by the learned court below
is totally against the principles of law. The land had great potential for being used
as urban area for industrial/residential purposes and in such a situation, it could not
be categorised as nehri and barani and compensation cannot be assessed in terms
thereof and for the purpose of urbanisation that categorisation looses its
significance. For that purpose, reliance was placed upon Shangara Singh vs
Punjab State and others , 2006 (2) PLJ 389 and it was further submitted that the
entire chunk of land was falling within the municipal limits of Bahadurgarh and
considering that fact the value thereof should not be assessed in acres rather it
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [61]

would be in square yards as the land in the urban area is sold in small pieces of
plots and not on per acre basis.

Judgment of this Court in R. F. A. No. 2501 of 2001 Ved Pal and
others vs State of Haryana and others
, decided on 3.5.2006, was relied upon to
submit that price as was charged by HUDA for the sale of undeveloped plot of
measuring 20000 square meters to Indian Oil Corporation (Ex. P-30 and P-31),
two years prior to the acquisition should be relied upon for the purpose of
determination of value of the acquired land. In Ved Pal’s case (supra), the value of
the acquired land was assessed on the basis of price charged by HUDA for sale of
big chunk of land to M/s. Escorts India Limited. This judgment was upheld by
Hon’ble the Supreme Court.

In Pram Sukh and others vs State of Haryana and others, 2006 (2)
PLJ 39, this court had done away with the categorisation of land by holding that
once the same was within the municipal limits and had great potential for being
developed as residential/commercial area. Reference was also made to the cross-
examination of RW1 Bhisham Singh, Patwari, Faridabad HUDA, who admitted
that the boundary of the acquired land is close to Delhi border. In addition to this,
it is submitted that purpose of the acquisition is for used as residential/commercial,
a uniform rate should be awarded to all the landowners for the acquisition of land
irrespective of the land or location thereof.

Controverting the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the
landowners, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, submitted that none
of the sale-deeds as are sought to be relied upon by the landowners can be relied
upon for the purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land in the
present case as no site plan showing the location has been produced on record to
show comparative value thereof. It is only before this court that the location of the
land pertaining to some of the sale-deeds is shown by referring to their khasra
numbers. The sale-deeds which have been pointed out on the site plan, Ex. R-66,
show that those were pertaining to small plots which were quite close to the abadi
or the already developed area. The same for that reason also cannot be relied.

Replying to the exhibits relied upon by the learned counsel for the
landowners, it was submitted that as far as the land pertaining to sale-deed Ex. P-
13 is concerned, from the narration of facts, it is shown to be located on Jhajjar
Road which originate from Bahadurgarh side and the location thereof has not been
pointed out. It can be quite close to the abadi area as well. It was further pointed
out that the land acquired for Sector-7 in the year 1987 is also on the Jhajjar Road
side whereas in Delhi side the land was acquired in the year 1995 meaning thereby
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [62]

that the other area had already been developed. So far as the plea regarding Ex. P-
30 is concerned, it was submitted that it was sale of 20000 square meters of land
by HUDA to the Indian Oil Corporation in Sector-7, Bahadurgarh which was
already developed and all basic infrastructure was available there. Merely if it was
a big chunk of land, it cannot be said to be an undeveloped area. The same cannot
be compared vis-a-vis the location of the acquired land and consideration money
received by the HUDA cannot be made basis for determination of fair value of the
acquired land.

As far as sale-deeds Ex. P41 and P-43 are concerned, it is stated that
these are of very small plots measuring 100 square yards and 30 square yards
which are located close to the abadi area or on the road. The same being close to
the abadi or on the road and small pieces of land could not be relied for the
purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land. Similar was the view
with regard to the award, Ex. P-28, pertaining to the acquisition of 0.97 acres of
land which is close to the already acquired land for which the value was
determined at Rs. 9,50,000/- per acre. It was submitted that even the award of the
Collector for the acquired land shows that the land which was acquired
subsequently was close to the National-Highway and for that reason the
compensation was assessed at Rs. 9,50,000/- per acre. Even if that award is
considered which is for the acquisition carried out 2½ years later in time from the
acquisition in the present case, the value of the acquired land cannot be increased
further where it was assessed at Rs. 6,00,000/- per acre for the land located on the
National-Highway and was enhanced by the learned Reference Court to Rs.
6,50,000/- per acre. In addition to this, the reference was made to sale-deeds
produced by the State, namely, Ex. R-15, R-59 and R-64. Referring to site plan,
Ex. R-66, it was submitted that the land pertaining to sale-deed, Ex. R-15 which
was registered on 9.4.1992 of a small piece of 6 biswas of land, at an average price
of Rs. 2,66,666/- per acre. This land is located close to Najafgarh Road and near
the acquisition boundary.

As far as the land pertaining to Ex. R-59 is concerned, it was
submitted that 7 biswas of land was sold for a sum of Rs. 32,000/- at an average
price of Rs. 4,38,877.85. This land is located on Jhajjar road whereas the
landowners have referred to sale-deed Ex. P-13, showing the value therein at Rs.
230/- per square yard. It is submitted that in October 1995, the value in that area
was not more than Rs. 4,38,877.85 per acre as is shown in the aforesaid sale-deed.
In sale-deed, Ex. R-64, a big area measuring 7 kanals 6 marlas of land was sold for
a total consideration of Rs. 2,10,000/- on 18.4.1994 at an average price of Rs.

R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [63]

2,30,136.97 per acre. This land forms part of the revenue estate of Village Parnala
though is located around 3 acres away from the National Highway quite close to
the acquired land.

Learned counsel further submitted that the facts that the land falls
within the municipal limits have not been proved by leading any positive evidence.
The site-plan, Ex. P-22, proved by the landowners on record only showed the
municipal limits but it does not show whether the acquired land is in municipal
limits. He further submitted that this very small portion of acquired land which is
abutting the National Highway though on the other end it abuts the Najafgarh road.
The entire land cannot be valued at the same rate as the land which is located far
from the road and is also not connected with any road, carry less value. Further
relying upon Union of India and others v. Mangatu Ram and others, (1997) 6
SCC 59, it is submitted that belting system as has been applied by the learned
court below for determination of fair value of the acquired land on the main road
and upto a depth of 3 acres has rightly been done. Reference was placed on para
30 of the impugned award, where the learned court below without referring to any
of the evidence led by the either of the parties has merely enhanced the
compensation by considering the potentiality of the land which is stated to be
totally against the law.

In so far as Ex. P-51 referred to by the learned counsel for the
landowners regarding rates fixed by HUDA for sale of plots in Sectors 9 and 9-A
is concerned, the submission is that the broacher was issued on 25.5.1999 i.e. 4
years after the acquisition and after the land had already been developed with all
basic infrastructure. As far as the rates of plots which were subsequently sold in
the developed area cannot be made basis for the determination of the fair value of
the acquired land.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant
referred record.

As far as location of the land is concerned, the fact is not in dispute
that small portion of it is located on Delhi-Hissar road close to city of Bahadurgarh
towards Delhi. The acquisition boundary does not abut Delhi border, as there is
land of another village in between, though it is not far off from there. It is part of
the national capital region. The other end of the acquisition boundary abuts
Nazafgarh road originating from Bahadurgarh. The urbanised area of the city of
Bahadurgarh at the relevant time was abutting the acquisition boundary. Some
factories were also situated near the acquired land. A perusal of site plan (Ex. P-

29), which is draft development plan for controlled area No. 1, 2 and 3 -2021 AD
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [64]

pertaining to the area of Bahadurgarh shows that the acquired land is about two
kilometers from Delhi border on one side, i.e., if moving from Hissar to Delhi on
NH-10, whereas its other boundary which falls on Bahadurgarh-Nazafgarh road is
also at the same distance. The entire acquired land falls within the municipal
limits extended in the year 1993. Towards the east of the acquired land, MIE
industrial area is situated, which abuts Delhi border. Government College, other
commercial establishments and residential colonies are also situated in the vicinity.
It is also evident from the oral statements of the witnesses that some residential
colonies were located in the vicinity of the acquired land and even certain
residential houses which were located on the acquired land were released from
acquisition. Bus stand of Bahadurgarh is situated about 1-1/2 kilometers from the
acquired land. Learned counsel for the land owners had relied upon sale deeds (Ex.
P12, Ex. P13, Ex. P14, Ex. P41 and Ex. P43). In addition to this, award (Ex. P28)
pertaining to the acquisition of small portion of land falling within Sector 9/9-A
was also relied upon. Besides this, letter of intent (Ex. P30 and Ex. P31) issued by
Haryana Urban Development Authority to Indian Oil Corporation for allotment of
20,000 square meters of land in Sector 7, Bahadurgarh was also referred to. As
regards other evidence on record, no reliance was placed thereon keeping in view
the fact that either the same was after the date of acquisition or much prior thereto.

On the other hand, learned State counsel had referred to and relied
upon sale deeds (Ex. R15, Ex. R.59 and Ex. R.64) to submit that the enhancement,
which has been made by the learned court below, was not called for and the award
of the Collector deserves to be upheld.

As far as sale deed (Ex. P12), relied upon by the land owners is
concerned, it has come on record that the same was part of a developed area in a
residential colony and situated towards Delhi side from the acquired land. As far as
sale deed (Ex. P13) is concerned, the land pertaining thereto is located on
Bahadurgarh-Jhajjar road but the same has not been pointed out on any site plan on
record. Even otherwise, the sale deed was registered on 28.2.1989, whereas on
Jhajjar road, the acquisition for development as Sector 7, HUDA, Bahadurgarh had
already been carried out in the year 1987, meaning thereby some development
activity had started towards that area and therefore, the price as is mentioned in the
sale deed, cannot as such be relied upon. As far as land pertaining to sale deed (Ex.
P14) is concerned, the same is dated 23.5.1989, whereby 410 square yards of land
was sold at an average price of Rs. 195/- per square yard. It was sold nearly 6 years
prior to the acquisition. The land as such has not been located on any site plan.
However, considering the khasra number, mentioned in the sale deed, learned
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [65]

counsel for the land owners pointed out the same on the site plan located near the
main Delhi-Hissar road.

As far as sale deeds (Ex. P41 and Ex. P.43) are concerned, the same
pertain to 100 and 30 square yards respectively, which are located near the abadi
on the road, the already developed area. The same otherwise also being for small
piece of land cannot be relied upon as such for determination of fair value of big
chunk of land. As far as reliance on brochure (Ex. P51) issued in 1999 by Haryana
Urban Development Authority for sale of plots in developed Sector 9/9-A,
Bahadurgarh, for which the land in question was acquired, is also not relevant for
the purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land, as by that time in
6-7 years gap, the land in question had been developed after providing all basic
amenities and even the area in the vicinity had been developed. If the award (Ex.
P28) pertaining to the acquisition of small left over portion of Sector 9/9-A, as was
notified on 2.12.1998 is concerned, there is a gap of 3-1/2 years in between. It is
further noticed in that award that compensation therefor is being assessed only at
the rates at which the land on the main National Highway is assessed, as this
portion of the land was located on the Highway. If the time gap in the two
acquisitions is considered, further increase in the value of the acquired land will
not be possible, as in the present case, the Collector himself had assessed the value
at Rs. 6,00,000/- per acre for the land abutting the main Highway which was
further increased to Rs. 6,50,000/- per acre by the learned court below. If an
increase of 12% per annum is considered thereon, the value comes the same, as is
determined by the Collector.

As far as sale deeds relied upon by the State are concerned, the same
have merely to be referred and rejected for the simple reason that all of them are
not relevant. Sale deed (Ex. R59) is pertaining to the land, which is located on
Jhajjar road on the other side of Bahadurgarh city. The land forming part of sale
deed (Ex. R64), though is located near the acquired land, but the value thereof is
less than the award of the Collector. Similar is the position with regard to sale deed
Ex. R.15, the land of which is located on Nazafgarh road beyond the acquisition
boundary. The exact location thereof is not known as it is only the khasra number
which is pointed out. The khasra will certainly have much bigger area, whereas the
sale deed is pertaining to only 6 biswas of land. Another document, on which
strong reliance was placed upon by the learned counsel for the land owners, is
letter of intent (Ex. P30 and Ex. P.31) dated 19.1.1993, issued by Haryana Urban
Development Authority to Indian Oil Corporation for allotment of 20,000 square
meters of land in Sector 7, Bahadurgarh @ Rs. 1486.51 per square meter. It is not
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [66]

in dispute that this portion of land is located on the other side of the city towards
Hissar. The land for Sector 7 was acquired way back in the year 1987. The area
had been developed in 6 years till the land was allotted to Indian Oil Corporation.
Though it is a big chunk of land but cannot be said to be a plain land with no
amenities as such. Accordingly, the same as such cannot be relied upon for the
purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land. Another factor, which
makes this piece of evidence to be not safe enough for the purpose of
determination of fair value of the acquired land is that it was a deed between two
entities of State, namely, Haryana Urban Development Authority and Indian Oil
Corporation Limited. However, the same will certainly throw some light on the
value of the land and its potential in the area.

From the material placed on record by the parties, there is no
concrete evidence as such available on record which could be picked up
immediately to be relied upon for the purpose of determination of fair value of the
acquired land. However, the transactions of sale in the area may be even for
smaller or bigger plots certainly throw light on the prices of land in the area. As
has already been noticed above, the distance of the acquired land from Delhi
border is approximately two kilometers. Though, as discussed above, sale deed
(Ex. P12) as such could not be relied upon, where 8 kanals and 7-1/2 marlas of
land was sold @ Rs. 400/- per square yard registered on 22.4.1993 for the reason
that this land was situated close towards Delhi from the acquired land and was
within the residential area. This portion of land is also stated to be 3-1/2 acres off
the National Highway. Meaning thereby that there was population even in between
the area from the acquired land till Delhi border and a judicial notice can always
be taken of the fact near the border, the immediate area in the vicinity on the road
or even behind that is always developed as Sales Tax Barrier or the security set up,
Toll Tax Collection points etc. are not located just at the border, but at some place
within the boundaries of the State. For small piece of land near the acquired land,
purchased for shop or residence 5-6 years before the acquisition, the sale
consideration is ranging from Rs. 195/- to Rs. 230/- per square yard in terms of
the evidence produced on record.

As far as the learned court below is concerned, it has assessed the
value of the acquired land upto a depth of three acres on Bahadurgarh-Delhi road
at Rs. 6,50,000/- per acre, i.e., Rs. 134.29 per square yard, if one acre is considered
equivalent to 4840 square yards, whereas for the land, which is situated on
Nazafgarh road, the value was assessed at Rs. 4,50,000/- per acre, i.e., @ Rs. 92.97
per square yard. For the land in between, two rates were fixed, i.e., Rs. 3,00,000/-

R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [67]

per acre for nehri and chahi kind of land and Rs. 2,50,000/- per acre for Barani and
other kind of land, which comes to Rs. 61.98 and Rs. 51.65 per square yard,
respectively.

Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, as far as belting of
the land is concerned, i.e., land located on NH-10 – Delhi Hissar road and
Bahadurgarh-Nazafgarh road, the learned court below has not committed any
illegality as the land on road upto a certain depth certainly carries more value and
potentiality. As far as the land behind that is concerned, in the present case, the
learned court below has upheld the categorisation thereof as Nehri and Barani
which, in my opinion, is not called for in the facts and circumstances of the present
case. That is for the simple reason that the land, which is strategically located,
having potential for being used as urban/commercial/industrial purposes, the
classification thereof as Chahi/Barani looses its significance, as it is to be used for
construction activity. Accordingly, the classification of land as Chahi/Barani is
done away with and the entire chunk of land beyond the depth of three acres on the
roads is to be assessed at the same rate.

Now the issue comes up about the assessment of value thereof. In my
opinion, it is a case where certain guess work has to be applied, taking an over-all
view of the factual situation, as discussed above, and accordingly, for the land
located on NH-10 Delhi-Hissar road upto a depth of three acres from the main
road, the value is enhanced from Rs. 134.29 per square yard to Rs. 150/- per
square yard. For the land located on Nazafgarh-Bahadurgarh road upto a depth of
three acres is enhanced from Rs. 92.97 to Rs. 100/- per square yard, whereas for
the land situated behind that, the compensation is enhanced to Rs. 65/- per square
yard. The land owners shall also be entitled to all the statutory benefits available
under the Act.

The appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated above.

(Rajesh Bindal)
Judge
February 10, 2009
mk