High Court Kerala High Court

Chandrathil Nijil vs Station House Officer on 16 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
Chandrathil Nijil vs Station House Officer on 16 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 149 of 2007()


1. CHANDRATHIL NIJIL, AGED 22 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. STATE, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.KHALID

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :16/01/2007

 O R D E R
                           V. RAMKUMAR, J.



                    ---------------------------



                     B.A.Nos.149 & 186 of 2007



                    ---------------------------



                       Dt.  JANUARY 16, 2006



                                 ORDER

These are applications for regular bail. The

petitioner in B.A.No.149/2007 is the 7th accused and the

petitioners in B.A.No.186/2007 are accused Nos.1, 4 and 6

in Crime No.589/2006 of Valapattanam Police Station for

offences punishable under sec.489B and 489C I.P.C.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the

applications and made available to him the case diary files

for perusal.

3. What is unfolded by the investigation thus far

conducted by the police is the following:-

As per information received from the Superintendent of

Police, Kannur, the Sub Inspector of Police, Traffic Police

Station, Kannur, reached a place called Kattampalli at 1.30

a.m. on 6.12.2006 and found a Tata Sumo car bearing

registration No.KL-13/P-1904 and one motorcycle parked by

the side of the Kattampalli bridge. The police party

headed by the Sub Inspector approached the car and demanded

BA 149 & 186/07 Page numbers

the persons inside to open the door. Accordingly, the door

of the car was opened and accused Nos.1 to 6 got down from

the car. The 7th accused was the driver of the car. Even

though the police party ransacked the car, they did not

obtain anything incriminating from the motor vehicle.

Thereafter the accused persons were subjected to a body

search during the course of which 77 forged currency notes

of Rs.100/- and Rs.50/- denominations and bearing the same

serial number for both denominations were recovered from

the body of accused Nos.1 to 6. Finding that the aforesaid

currency notes were counterfeit notes, the police party

arrested all the accused persons, seized the currency motes

as well as the car and the motorbike under a mahazar. The

accused persons, the incriminating material objects,

seizure documents and the vehicles were produced before the

S.H.O., Valapattanam Police Station where the above crime

was registered. The investigation of the case has

subsequently been entrusted with the C.B.C.I.D., SIG-III,

Kozhikode.

4. Having regard to the fact that the 7th accused is

only the driver of the Tata Sumo which is a taxi car

regularly parked at Kololam taxi stand and no counterfeit

notes were recovered from him, I am inclined to grant bail

to the 7th accused. But, in the case of accused Nos.1, 4

BA 149 & 186/07 Page numbers

and 6, fake notes were recovered from their person and the

investigating agency is seriously probing into the

ramifications of the racket and the source of the

counterfeit notes. At this stage of the investigation I am

not inclined to grant bail to accused Nos.1, 4 and 6.

Accordingly, the 7th accused (petitioner in B.A.149/2007) is

directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for

Rs.15000/- with two solvent sureties, each for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Kannur, and

subject to the following conditions:-

1. The 7th accused shall report before the

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. He shall make himself available for

interrogation as and when required by the

police till the filing of the final report.

3. He shall not influence or intimidate the

prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to

tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. He shall not commit any offence while on

bail.

If the 7th accused commits breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be

cancelled.

BA 149 & 186/07 Page numbers

In the result, B.A.149/2007 is allowed and bail is

granted to the 7th accused and B.A.186/2007 is dismissed

refusing bail to the petitioners therein.

(V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

mt/-