Sri V Thimmaiah S/O Late Sri. … vs The City Municipal Council on 30 August, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BAN

 

Dataer1:This the 36* day afAugmst 3010 .   

BEFD%

TI-{E I-Ionmn mz.Jus'mcI~:. VJAGANH5fiI§l§.::~    f  "  

.--papa:-uupm-unncn--

1 am V  S10 M113"-SR1 VVEHKATAPPA
AGz1:>Anom'61 YEARS *   
RIAT No.48,    .% * 

NEAR 
wsxwmnnmm    % a
car smzr (;._c3.GQPE;AS'mhy1Y,,COUHSEL ma

mum-«--

   1   COUNCIL

A  'T;E I     '
 %  057
%  3;mé.B«g §:OhfldI3SIONER

L   2 v%sR1m#1a4s%s/0 SRIVENKATARAMAHAPPA

_ was 2.7 mans
 AC<3LIH.EiIIJ.AR(WARD No.33)

  AT; I

vzcm mwamxaean

BAH&&LORE-560 091 ..REsPONDENTS

(BY smzzx VH , ADV. FOR R1)

Tm Review Petition fllad uft) 4′? Ru}: 1 at’ CPO,
prayingfiarrevieav <:ft1wOrdea'[Juditanc1Dwreeda1:ed
13-12-2007 passed in WA 2270/2307', on the file the
HighCourt ofliarnamkn, Bangnbre.

Tm RP. minim on for admission thb _

mdethefoflawing:

Heard leamnd Coumel for the

respect of the applications meaifegf *

additional documents aha

2. submimon mad; %jj c:a;mae1 for the
revigw petitioxam both aids

L Jud mmaaeea 13.12.2007,

sama urged. mmefom. revfiew of the

1: Tn his further mbmmm that

to show that review petifionw ‘3 owner

. 1 property and :3 such, the review

%pekt>;t§;¢:::%3:e allowed.

1 ” C.C}.Go;nlnnwa1:ny appearing finr Shri S.V.Bhat fisr tm
” review pctitionar and $1 counsel sm satmaha D.J. for