M.F.A.N0. 1 E7?5:'20=3§
IN me' may catch? 0? KAMA TAKA AT
DATED mrs THE 7TH DAY 0:? JULY, ~
: PRESENT:
'HIE Homm: mwsncz xK.a§i~;m.§ _ V %
AND
rm-: H9N'BLE %%
M.F.A..Na.. 21 1 775k%§§'~2gosmag.g
BETWEFR4
1 MASTER vmsn Mznammm TEAGARAJRREBDY
AGED A£§Qt3T_ 1:: YEAR8, NQ;~a3:49e
sm cacass, }i+'£NY.A.K.§ mvour, mfaaam-rv
B-uamm, 4s:v*;4_m~: FIE';i,E_}, aawakwaa .
Beam; MSNGR Rap av':-4:3 Fametwam
:«4As'L:F¢.as;.'a:=:3;5;2o:,ixag¢;-VT NAG-.ARMA§REDDY
_ _ _ V. ...A.PPELLAN'¥
(By Sri: <3 2;: snags;vAsA1%iEoi3\zf_",-Vabvocawe )
AW: V
.A 2.. $';f§!.A-¥5'N.SHARMA
'- _ sm.Vss»:EETA:.
A S-Ai'--$DL{}M'f
seuxfmua ¥(A£iU.GDBl
E;*§$4G2%:3.£3RE
2 ~. mg»: DWISIGNAL Mameavz
T 'me New tum Aswnnwce on 2.70
' auvasm cméce -- v
enrmrav ROAD
BA£~£GALOR'E - swam
{R-1 semen
Sri: R RAJAGOPALAN. ADVOCATE ma R2 )
k£T".A.NO. ll'F73'%G5
TFRS MFA IS HLED U38 1773(1) OF MV ACT AGAl¥$i§F.[.THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD mTED1 PASSED IN
ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, METRGPQLITAR
BANGALORE, (SCCH-5). PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAiM«.PETIT!0i'~£ FOR
COMPENEATKDN AND SEEKNG ENHANCEMENT OF
This M.F.A. ceming on fer1;.3d;fiisaifig
mum. J,de1ivmt2d£h£:foI1mv1'flfi: i ».
:J Lu)
This appaai by: 2139 is'. of the
judgment and award 2005 passed
by the Mom? Court of smau
Causes, $ !f1o;t:E,4'fibuna{~' in M.V-C.No.
2398 carm::er1sauon' awardad
by the Tribfinal "in so far as it rel:-11% to 'mas of
amefiéfies of .'Lii'efVafid '.'1VI-"aii:n and sufferinw".
havgéheard seamed comm awing far
mined counse! appnwfing for second
resJ;2oi1ci':erz€;§?1§surance Company.
A. .3: .. There is no dispute vvish regard to the facts and
"'r§ircuirr1sta-nees of tm case. The grievance of the ieamed
'fictsunsei appearing far the appellant i3 that, 3 sum cf
Rs.10,000I~ and R92 - awarded by fim Tribunal
.....-----*"""""°"""'m*§'
M.I='.A.NO. 317752905
4»
towards lass af amenitim cf iife and pain and
isinadequate and it needsto be modified. it
Of the appeiiant that, ciaimant is a young
bright future and taking this %--.af K
consideration and having regard fiffheu
suffered by him as he I
29.4.2002
and providesziyvflh ébout two
weeks and it was a m§jdr_’sair:3£éry the pottion of
intestine and -_-per the claimant
may be f<§1j~:.._ defence and police
deparémem, §:e agetjottraéijcansadereei view that the appeiiant
has madé,_g'utV 5 'enhancement of compensation
, A_ of of life and pain and sufierings.
, ,- ., 4.zt'ifra_1Iig-ht of me facts and circumstamw of the
" above and after re-appreciation of the
maié¢fi§!'«;a§éiIable an record, we deem it fit to enhance the
A 5]' tewards less of amenitim of fife and pair: and
éufferings. Accordingly, we enhame Rs.20.000i- towards
ioss of amenitia of life and Rs.25,0C01- towards pain and
/M.
M.i”1A.N0. ii77§:’200$
sufiarings in add-Efion to what has been
Tribunal.
5. In so far as other
award passed by Trflauhai;aaréV”c§ié1serre§8;.’j._’Sefig *
with the findings recnrded _vCi2a irn§._ ‘ ‘jl’rit:iunaf and
they remain L
6. HaviJ;?1’g””;*sé’gV\ag’é:!’tc:»;_ circumstanca-s of
the case filed by appeuant is
auaweasn pm,%j%;j%f
‘ir’s,ail,fiV f;’vés.4j15,€}00/–, Le. Rs.20,000I- towards
of fife and Rs.25,000f- tawams pain and
wifiw intermt at 6% per annum
V «V fljzé of pefitier: tiii me date :3? reaiizaiion.
respon-dent–lnsurance company is directed
. ” -widepasit fire said amount Mtmn six wméks from today.
§§.F.A.N0. Ii’}”75f2095
Immediately after the depmit by the I-a*\s-fwfance
Campany, me Cilaims Tribunal is directed tofhg
amount in favour cf the appellant.
Sd/….
Judge
13″,’ ——– ‘V