The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 22 October, 2008

._ NAT'I{)I'§AL INSURANCECOMPANY LIMITED
 'DIVISIONAL--OFFICE - 3," """ 
v.' SR1 'LAKSHM1'COMP_'LEX
'1,S~1?'-$9, '3T.'MARK'S ROAD

I   (BY IS'5§3§_II§IM\(JIf3.\)'I?:\E;I,ADV€>CATE)

" , 195:1, ARISING OUT OF GRDER DATED 28.032005 PASSED IN
 A HA NQ,1S53/BANG/2005 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2661-2002,
 Pi?A'.'I£_\£C-3' TO FGRMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTICWS CIF LAW
__I$T}7-.TEDA THEREIN AND? TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE

.:""I3'2--~~ITA NOJSS3/EANG/2005, DATED 28.09.2006 AND CONFIRM THE
 ",0RDERS OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND THE INCOME TAX
" -I «~ OFFICER (TBS), WARD 16(2), BANGALORE.

IN THE HIGH cousrr or KARNATAKA AT sANGALc}9;;:%iI'LV;I  

DATED was THE 22"" DAY OF OCTOBER.gj0OV8.I:'V: ~   ~
PRESENV ,I L  "I ?6L' V. ¢
7:42 HUMBLE MRJUSTICE K:.sRE,E_o:LHAa'1 5
AND °   .   " ' I  I

THE HOWBLE MR.JUSTIC*ELC4f§.KUMAR.£§S'WfiK£§éi'Y' 

INCOME TAX A?PEALI-.'a"§;_:~3S9IA _OF12G08 

§ 

1 THE commxssxcwea oF"INc:5:«4é-"réx,   " 
C.R. Bu1LD1m3_.«..Q;:EeN;s agar:  - 
aANsAa_ogE:_ *  2 

2 THE Iwcizgae-fix d:5F1c_é':{i(*rt>é;');' 1
WARDe1fi_('.2),_ L2.§:';.,__B,1_.II*;._ ':.Ne, ~ 
QUEENS R~'L)3§>JZ?, BANGALORE _  APPELLANTS

(BYISRIII: M v  JIKDIVOCATE)

ANQ;

aa.N<:.Aa_c§RvE' " .s'so";acV1.  RESPONDENT

‘INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260% OF

‘ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, EANGALORE

4/