High Court Kerala High Court

Kaniyar Thodika Ahammed vs Manjeri Jameela on 12 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kaniyar Thodika Ahammed vs Manjeri Jameela on 12 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RPFC.No. 14 of 2007()


1. KANIYAR THODIKA AHAMMED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MANJERI JAMEELA, D/O.ALAVINNI,
                       ...       Respondent

2. MEHAROOFA, 15 YEARS (MINOR).

3. NIJAS, 12 YEARS(MINOR),

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA

                For Respondent  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :12/01/2010

 O R D E R
                      M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                 R.P.(F.C.) NO. 14      OF 2007
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 12th day of January, 2010.

                           O R D E R

This revision is preferred against the order of the Family

Court, Malappuram in M.C.1/06. The couple got married in

1989 started living separately in 1993 and it is averred that

they rejoined in 1997 and again separated in 2005. The Court

below found that for a period of 12 years the total

maintenance paid by the husband is Rs.12,800/-. He had also

remarried and is living with his new wife and children. The

learned counsel for the revision petitioner would contend that

it was only on the fault of the first wife that she was living

separately. The case will speak for itself and the attitude of

the husband to the wife in the form of maintenance is

evidenced by the discussion in paragraph 6 of the order. It is

true that Mohammedan Law permit to marry more than once

but the Mohammedan Law also states that if you marry more

than once he has to treat his wives equally and also to look

after them equally. That is what is not done by the husband

R.P.(F.C.) NO. 14 OF 2007
-:2:-

and ordinarily a wife with three children will not desert her

husband especially when she is having no financial resources.

Admittedly the husband is running a mobile tea shop and

therefore taking note of the entire situation I hold that the

wife and children are living separately for proper reason and

therefore award a reasonable quantum whereby the wife has

to be paid a maintenance of Rs.600/-, the first son Rs.500/-,

2nd child Rs.500 thus making a total sum of Rs.1,600/- which

will be payable from the date of petition. The amount already

paid or deposited shall be taken credit of.

R.P.(F.C.) is disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-