Karnataka High Court
M/S Balram Cine Publicity vs Mrs.Vimala Bai on 20 August, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
BETWEEN:
AND:
DATED THIS THE 20?" DAY OF AUGUST, 2010
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAWAD RA_E_I'IM~f.C"~V.._,_f _
CRP N0. 189 OF 2010
M/S BALRAM CINE PUBLICITY,
(M/S BALRAM PUBLICITY-)_ " , -
REPRESENTED BY ITS PP.Q"P.REETRI_X,' ' "
MISSDIVYA REKHA.B. G' 1
NO.8/1, 15' 'C' MAIN ROAD,
BEHIND BENNY EV':-«Eli,GAN(3Ai\i'AG.A'R,
BANGALORE -- 5600_3'2*.,.* _ .
RETITIONER
(BY SRI _S--IVIvSHvI;{AIIT_H: S.H'E.TIY,'ADV.)
MRS1;VIr$a¢I;A.LA"«EAI_; A'
wxo'LA_TVE'MR,RA.ryIA_NATH
'!é'l<.PETITIOi\i
SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY REMOVING HOAROINOS PUT UP
av THE }UDGMENT DEBTOR TO THE DECREE HOLDERS
THEREEN.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSiV:(3'F\i"f§.F§IS
DAY, THE MADE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:~__;'_'""*--« i ;_.
Petitioners' counsei fiies fa that
petitioners have removed .»ho_ardin"g.,_}'roIn2tiig....o_sciIeciIJie:":H.
premises and deiivered possesiésmpri of the to the
respondents. On thavt--..ti:;3siS'é__ itiisu "s.t'a..t.é'd _ that the present
petition has become infruotoousAe:Incifi"'i'*ei:I'oes"t to dismiss the
petition as
2.: _ Aettisvrdving_;iy',._it*h,e memo is aiiowed. Petition is
dismissed es havi.ng'-«.Deeo'--m'e infructuous.
.....
Ififigfef
via ‘ V