The District Health Officer vs V Govindaswamy S/O O G … on 26 May, 2009

M'$c.Cv1. N0'50-45z'2699

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT sANGA_;;z§%R%g
DATED THIS THE 26115 DAY me' MAY ; j--i 1:  .
BEF°RE.%.~ >  % V  V V
mm 1mx'3LE ma. JUs1'zcE:=:;:. 
MISC.       .

M FA N{5."?J;):4E/2002V"   
BETWEEN:   "

1. The Districii:Ht;:511t1i" *'-. .  
Oficcr,   3}.  "
MYSGIE.  AV   
Owner-ciun~¢L!.s V' «;ia_n"efJ:,:c"p...__ -- I
Bearing Nb, (ext: _155}-.  

2. The  G o'vi:rnf:1e1E1t

 v.Ié_nsu1ja'1é.ce: 'Dcparunént, .... .. v

 Kamiikshi Hospital,

' ' .Sa1'aswaihjpm'a1:r;1,., _

Saxicigshnagamj V'Bfm'Idi11g,

Mysore: ' Appellants

 (By G&a¢."A;1®;:ate for petition' 613

  Goxfiridaswamy,
  3/0.? 0 G Venkataramana Shetty, Major,
 -«.4 Rio. C/0. Balu House, Raiiway Station,
  __ ;?ax1eiavapura, Mandya District. Respondcnt

(By Sri i "R Biradar, Adv., for respondent)

Miscflvi. No.5045f?O(}9

2

This Misc. CV}. 13 filcd under Section 151 oi’th{=::

Pmccduzc, praying to withdraw the amount of’/_~ which”i$_

in deposit.

This case coming on for OIfl€I’:S’ thL§.$’ J

the following: _

That is no representation fx’o-r

2. Learned fqr submits that the

statutory a1a1ou11t_§£’._’_ in this case by the

appeflant fi;ay–.bc .tt3e”T1ibuna1 viz., Pr}. Civil Judge (Sr.

Diva.) 8:. Eat As the appiication is not opposeci,

the is to fransxnit the Statutory deposit amount to

[qgagg (Sr. Bivn.) at SI’irangapa1:I1a, for disbursement, in

judmcnt and decree made in MFA

‘ ‘VV’*”?o.7o4:€»–1 A

k ” k. 3;’«.Aoc;>xdingly, Misc.Cvl. 510.5045/2009 is dispoiscd of.

Sd/-

Judge