High Court Karnataka High Court

Karnataka Neeravari Nigam … vs Sri Kambar Pawadeppa Shidram on 6 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam … vs Sri Kambar Pawadeppa Shidram on 6 January, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal


Q3 ‘IHE HIGH COUR’I” QF KARNATALBLR. NI’ B&H
EFATED THIS THE 6* DAY CIF -JANUARY

BE FQRE

11-13 HcN’BLE Mr. JU8I’ICE Amv-I T ”

IT

BETWEEN V 4_ % V V
1 Knrmafxraxa 11EERAvA1ez’ru*:it}2m
corms BOARD BULIDBi’_£_.’§_ _»
me: E ?£iAEmEi)3£;£§.'(%_VEE})£II’ i ” ._ ‘
EAHGALIJRE 1, REi_F,B_YL’_I’S;VC0k£_F1%H”¥’_}
sacmmm, C} 5 ._ ..1.._?m1’1’It;:-KER
By $11.: 12′ 1’ I M
1 am:

sm A.zféa;r:x.t§:§:31fa. szmmaa

la.)

31% 1éa§ii?;#;:xE9:£=h« fiaman
saws ni5::_rs:a.5En_ 33′ L35:

{:3

SIi{§i’A$HeK Kanmak

« BEJMAPPA Icaman

: @955 .s*I1msH Bmsauma
Sam REVAPFA mwxsmma
ALL mg nmrox.

R10 afitxmn Baenwanxvmasfi

” z5.:§mm TQ, BEI.£§A”{.3Zhi nmmcr.

5 % ‘Ea’? SP1. 1.9.1313 &CQIIISi’i3′.€)K swam
gmraaz. mm pagans?

mm ammmszms

“* *~

” $15. smash A.}?ACKEA.P’URE, AI}Vfi{.’;A’IE ma R1 ’29 R5;
33: msaava 1231333′, ma FQR R6)

Mal’! vmwunl vr nmnwnnnnn mum i»§!L1,!{l Ur KAXNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0F KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

‘EIS WEI?’ PEITIIGH IE FILED UHBER AR’I’Ii3L% 326 AED
227 OF ‘IKE C30NS’13’.’IU’II(‘}Ii’ $13′ 111311.”: PRAYfiWG ‘TU Qtififi TEE

H511 COURT OF KARNAVAKA HKSH OF KARNAYAKA REG?! COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGI-i COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

IBIHIGEWEII JIIDGHMIT ARI} ORBER }3T.16.8..2C9€)S IN {AC
HCL5$[9§i (313 THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (E’sR.I}H), CRIKGIJI
FOUHI} AT AHHA. __

‘I’hia WA” zxamfing an Ear prelimbaxy

Group this day. the Craurt made the fa11¢wfi’1_g’:’*– . V. O

Tm land beamgfng to

13..0s.199(> fer the 55%!” T1 it!»
say that the Land amima the

. compentsatian’a.tV’R3.%%;;’5′?$g€}8p$,_ tk zrmtice

of the awgvfil on 23.03.199:3.

amt they sought

. ‘an apphca” tixzm under Sec*m’ I1

Aa:.%E ‘me mattm was referrad am 24.03.1999

% ggxe of six years. The Refiarezme Court ma

O camenaamn payable at Ra.52,000.(-

& w-1&1 ~ai1«;.a§.mmry benefits. ‘rm ,uamm’ am award 1’3

V _» V on the gmund that the refmrezxcm applimtian

iikélfis barred by statum.

2.1% datum as narrated by thcRefa1*% Ceurt

mmasfaflewaz /%

“… ………… W mmnmm rnun ..x.tg.u;-3:; ur rmlmnmnn HIGH ceusrr or xAmAm<A HIGH COURT or mmA1'AxA HIGH (SOUR? or KARNATAKA men c

{a} Hat: aff'r¢1im€11a1'5r Netifieauiork 13.38.1990
(b]Da'aa sfawazwci -21.12.1§¥9Q

(:3) Date ef' the amviee ef naticm

ta.) Date ofthe film thc * Y % '
zxisacnian 1&1) of*L,f§. —

{$3 Date af receipt: czf 1
~– 24V.%{;<:%.1999

3. unam-

Seotirm 13 «M1: by me in am.

as and 1=cr?66{95
disposgffi ark Foilawing the 1-waning
stmgad the view that the refs.-reacae

tlrw statutory pmiod. Henge the
‘rm judmmt arni award passed by

Ccmfl: in LAC N¢..55f 99 is quaahed.

is issued and made absaiute.

Sd/’3
fudge

mp