High Court Karnataka High Court

Ajjipal Coffee Estate … vs Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 10 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Ajjipal Coffee Estate … vs Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 10 December, 2008
Author: H.G.Ramesh
_ 1 _
fi.F'.A,&.13440é§'_QQZ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. AT BANGALORE

DATE!) TI-{I8 THE 1075 DAY OF DECEMBER 2008

BEFORE

THE i~IO!l'BLE MRJUSTICE !-I.G.RAME3_fi- I  .~  

BETWEEN:

AJJIFAL CGFFEE ESTATE (NAGAR-JUNA}   , - A .

REP. BY ITS PROPHETOR: M.S.(;HP§NDRAS'E{EKAR   
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS    
RAMANADURGA VILLAGE, 1.,INGAI)AI~iA_LL1.,_HOBLi« . , 9
TAIRIKERE TQ.,    '   " "
CEHIKMAGALUR DIST.      ..Ai'PELI.AN'i'

(BY MS. s.sHAsH1KA1HA _F0R'.s}é1 s'."rs4A'I¥:7§;SH as
SR1 K.fr..p;AQENpRA, AI)\(OCz'§.TES.};« '

1 oi%:mTA'L Ir$n§URAz~:§:Ta LTD.
REP. BY ITS BRAAN'C_H"«-MANAGER
cnxxmamma A V 

 2 ,.4.iAsi21F*~:xz;.v1J;é.Yvi:iJMAre

'-  Sffl N;MAmuNA"TI'HA
 AGE£).ABQUT21YEARS
 T " 'HC}SAMANE--EXTENSiON
 C'H!KM_AGA£UR

3  SMT; KEMPAMMA
 B.B.NANJUNDAIAH
 AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
A' * 4_ HOSAMfiNE EXTENSION

 ' ._ CHIKMAGALUR ..RESPONDEN'I'8

THIS M.P'.A. IS FILED U/S.30(1) OF' W.C.AC'T AGAINST

 -mg JUDGMENT 85 OREER DATED 27',/s;2o04 PASSED us:
 WCA.NF'.NO.'7/03 on THE FILE 0? THE commrsszoreae FOR'

WCIRKMENS COMPENSATION, CHICKMIEGALUEQ, AWARDING A
CGMPENSATION OF RS.1,42,832/- WITH 12% ENFEREST.

fliscelkaneous Firs? Aw No.   Ti « 



_ g _
M.F.A.Na.._§_._?440./£097

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING ON LA. THIS
BAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

There is a. delay of three years and three A’

(1 192 days) in filing the appeal. I.A.I/ 2007 %foi~

Candonafion of the delay. I haVe’~vht3arC=1

eounse} appearing for the

perused the affidavit filed ‘suppeat.
The cause stated in th.e.5aft3.davitA.ut¥._1e delay-Areeeds as
foilows: 4’ ‘ V V 2 %

.11. I am §7£_}:AAfv,; ;earS;A_ol{#’ fmm

seaeere and my doctor
hadeademiseci%«:¢g;:ejetaj:xa:»ez, hence I could not
at Bangalore and file
.. ____ reason for not filing the

” ‘, is bonafide and unintentional. I

case to urge about and if the

does not condone the delay in

_ the appeaz, I will be put to untold
~ : ergarczshagp andfincmcial difiicadtiese *

‘The cause shown is not suflicient to condone the

iherdinate delay of more than tlrxree years. Hence,

W7/’/Z

A1,F.A.Mg.13&/2097

I.A.I/2007 is dismissed. Consequentiy, the appeal aiso

faiis and is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

3111/ -Ata