Gujarat High Court High Court

Shri vs Unknown on 4 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Shri vs Unknown on 4 October, 2010
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Honourable H.B.Antani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/2344/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR REVIEW No. 2344 of 2008
 

In


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 8182 of 2006
 

In
FIRST APPEAL No. 3105 of 2005
 

=========================================================


 

SHRI
TASIR JALIL AHMED SHAH - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & 2 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MS
TANUJA KACCHI FOR MR PN BAVISHI
for Applicant(s) : 1,
1.2.1, 1.2.2,1.2.3  
MS SHRUTI PATHAK FOR MS MEGHA JANI for
Opponent(s) : 1, 
None for Opponent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 04/10/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)

The
present application for review is directed against the order dated
19.07.2006 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.9725/05,
whereby the direction was given to invest 80% of the amount and 20%
of the amount was permitted to be withdrawn.

Considering
the facts and circumstances, it appears that the Court had exercised
the discretion and the order for investment and withdrawal was
passed. There is no valid ground for review of the order. It may
also be recorded that the application was made in the year 2006 and
the application has remained pending for about four years. Same
circumstance would not prevail as has been canvassed in the present
application. Therefore, no case is made out for review. Further, it
is observed that if any other ground on account of medical expenses
or otherwise exist, the present order shall not operate as a bar.

Application
disposed of accordingly.

(JAYANT
PATEL, J.)

(H.B.

ANTANI, J.)

*bjoy

   

Top