High Court Kerala High Court

Kunjikannan Nair vs Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative on 23 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kunjikannan Nair vs Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative on 23 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP.No. 818 of 2010()


1. KUNJIKANNAN NAIR, DIRECTOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :23/09/2010

 O R D E R

A.K. Basheer & P.Q. Barkath Ali, JJ.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

R.P. No. 818 of 2010
in
WP(C)No. 14273 of 2010

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2010
Order
Basheer, J:

While disposing of the above writ petition, we had

directed the Joint Registrar to take a decision on the notice

issued by him under Section 32 of the Kerala Co-Operative

Societies’ Act within one month from the date of receipt of

a copy of the judgment, after affording sufficient

opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all others

concerned. Petitioner seeks review of the above judgment

contending that the Joint Registrar, in all likelihood, may

order supercession of the Managing Committee.

According to the petitioner, the hearing that may be

conducted by the Joint Registrar may turn out to be an

empty formality.

2. The only prayer in this petition is to keep the

order that may be passed by the Joint Registrar in abeyance

for a few days, so that the petitioner can avail of the right

of appeal.

3. Ms.Anu, learned Special Govt. Pleader for Co-

operation vehemently contends that the above prayer on a

RP.818/2010 : 2 :

mere apprehension or suspicion that the order to be passed

by the Joint Registrar would be against the petitioner cannot

be entertained a all.

Having regard to the peculiar facts and

circumstances of the case and keeping in view the decision

of their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Siemens Ltd. v.

State of Maharashtra (2007 (1) KLT 88 (SC)), we are

satisfied that the right of appeal, if any, available to the

petitioner need not be rendered nugatory. Therefore it is

directed that the order, if any, that may be passed by the

Joint Registrar shall be kept in abeyance for a period of ten

days from the date of order. In other words, the order of the

Joint Registrar shall come into force only on expiry of ten

days from the date of his order.

Issue copy of the order today itself.

A.K. Basheer
Judge.

P.Q. Barkath Ali
Judge.

an.