High Court Kerala High Court

C.M.Devassia And Others vs Shibu Paul And Others on 22 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
C.M.Devassia And Others vs Shibu Paul And Others on 22 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25434 of 2008(C)



1. C.M.DEVASSIA AND OTHERS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. SHIBU PAUL AND OTHERS
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :22/08/2008

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                       ===============
                    W.P.(C) NO. 25434 OF 2008 C
                   ====================

               Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008

                            J U D G M E N T

The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P8.

2. Ext.P8 is an ex parte interim order passed by the Tribunal for

Local Self Government Institutions in Appeal No.411/08 filed by the 1st

respondent. According to the petitioners, by this order, Tribunal has stayed

the order passed by the Panchayat refusing to grant licence to the 1st

respondent to run a piggery.

3. According to the petitioners on the strength of Ext.P8, the 1st

respondent is now trying to revive his activities of the piggery. It is

submitted that when this issue came up before this court in WP(C)

No.33373/07, this court had passed only Ext.P2 order which had the effect

of maintaining status quo and that Ext.P8 goes much beyond the scope of

the said order.

4. As is seen from Ext.P8, it is purely an ex parte interlocutory

order passed by the Tribunal. Therefore, if the petitioner or the other

respondents in the appeal are aggrieved, it is always open to them to

WPC 25434/08
:2 :

seek variation of the said order before the Tribunal itself. In my view, that

is the right course available to the petitioners also.

Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioners to move the Tribunal to

seek variation of Ext.P8 and directing that, if any such application is filed,

the same shall be dealt with on an expeditious basis, I dispose of this writ

petition.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp