High Court Karnataka High Court

Ramanna S/O Dodda Shivappa vs The Deputy Commissioner(Food) on 1 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Ramanna S/O Dodda Shivappa vs The Deputy Commissioner(Food) on 1 June, 2009
Author: B.S.Patil
WMIWOI

WP 813?8/26309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA

CERCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

DATED THIS THE 18? DAY OF JUNE, 2009 'f -V.

SEFORE

THE HOBPBLE MR..1UsT1cE..13.s..'f$é§'f:'{;.--'I. »'  4

w.P.no.3137s/zmérieéminéy     

BWYWEEN:

Sri Ramanna,
S/<3 Dodda Shivappa, 
Aged aboui 35 years,  

Dec: Fair Price Shop Licenceex    

R/0 Wandli Hosur,
Tainkt Lingasuguxj,  
Dist. Raichur   

{By S1-i veerésgg B.Pa££1_;z§§£1V:H)   

AND:

  " « 5§'he- i§7ep:;1;t3? iT:Qmfii iSS'i01t£er (Faaé) ,

. Raichur 
 _Ra§ch.:;:;1'.'~,_ A .  "

'   2. "Flies.Assista;ni,_f%mmissioz1er,

_ Lingasugilf Taluka,
V ._Li¥1gas:1gi:r,

 .  4 ' ---- _ Tiisit, Raichlxr.

 i:1, 'E7}fi€:--'¥7;éi11asi1dar,

'  Li;1gasugur'¥'a1uk,

%   fifaichur District.

 " fiiy Sri 8.3.1-Ctxmman, GA)

   PETITIOHER

 RK»8P*ONDEN'i'S



WP 8137'8/2009

M2-

This Writ Petifion is fim under Articles 225~1%s;,3.2_2?:_:'¢£ the
Constitution of Endia, itaraying to quash the 

19,()3.20{}9 passed by the Rfigpandeni'  

No.AI-IARA:20:20€)8--O9 as per Annexur7~.;«B.:...[ A L '

This xx;-'n'.'£: petition is coming 0:: for 'O.r('i::.3:s,  Liay,  Csznirt

maria the faiiowing:

1.

Qrder ‘by the 3″!’ resp0ndent~
Tahsildar, LinggsL;i;,§1:1Jif:i3′;V-pfi&§11r:~;igc;i’~«ififlziswrit petifion.

2. By has transfermcl ihe raticvn
cards of théiwqarrzi to the petitioner’s fair price shop

to a3.1oth¢r_fair jificgfi shép in the ititmrest of the public and in

f{?iz:zx_z have harm given against the petitioner.

3. ._ to go into the details of the facts invalveé in

1;i:::is cése aé iearneci Govemmsm Advacatc appearing for

” : vi%3 $<:»nd;:ni$"'T§.. ta 3 submits in the course of his arguments that 'thf:

Lingasugur when had passed {ha izmpugned order dateé

has Withdrawn thig otfier subsequently' reaiising that he

"§1:;{d no power {:3 pass such. an order transferritxg the caxfis of one fair

V' pfiéii shaop £0 armflzer. Learned. Government Ad,ve::»cat:: further

\_,,

WP 813'?'8/Z2009

4&3:

submits that the petitioner is restored with the 313.tiT’§.(‘;>.’I”§f’.’:’1:¥’;’.l:'{;.i.–‘:i’#’1′;:3.VVi’£”2. run

the fair prics Shep. It is that the wisdom dawneci”«’:r_::$I:.i:1’1;-EL”

after an interim order of stay was . his A’

power to transfer the cards came to 138 (»i:’7§£3§:3~?i#.’iéfidZ>15:3 f.’OI’f:

4. Though it is rather dismtssfiig’ fugd VCSif3(i in
an authority is sought to cave}; 1;;:feIring to the
rules concerned andV hcncq for taking serious
notice, I refrain has subsequently
rfialiseci his Order. Suiflice to observe
that in mafitééfgx Vvjconcemed must first satisfy
himself Itg$i_r;:1i”:n’g fiowcr and juzisdiction, as per }aW

to pass such ‘0,rcit:’r, ‘._aS’-,~:§’i:11e1wise it will result in assuming

j1;xjisdiC_fi£}:1 avé p€rsér:;w:r.r««a1:t}10:it§§ who has no such juxisciictjsn to

pass sfich st;; £fiui0r;§’ ordms.

k}_r; ‘the _cfifi’€§2_):}j}3;stanCes, the? oniy orcjier that is Itxguired to be

p.’;§: se(i in wzhisggcase is to Iecoiti the submissign made by ‘tbs leaxned

Advacate and dispese of the writ pefiiion holding that in

figiht ‘bf {ha subsequent orfier passed by the Tahaiidar revoking

‘ fifiiei” tran.sf5::*riI3.g fllifi carcis 0f the pcti1:ioner’s fair price shop, this

‘ s

WP 83378/2009

writ petition does not survive any longer for consiée1*atiQ’;1_.__L’ VI}-:iti.ti0n

stands disposed of accetfiingly.

%

I-{K

kS&;f~