High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri.Ramesh S/O Hanamappa Nidoni vs The Commissioner on 11 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Ramesh S/O Hanamappa Nidoni vs The Commissioner on 11 August, 2009
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
{N THE HIGH mum' ()9 KARNATAKA  

CIRCUIT BENCH AT D§§ARWAI}h__ ""~.,_   

DATED THIS THE 1 rm DAY  §{U'sT-:2d 9' ~:r_V   

BEFQRE A »
'ma HOWBLE MRJUSTICE Malian si§::aI§1'A1~§;Afiu:§i}I31é§R

WRYI' PETKTIQN rs"--_ms'1': BLJAPUR

  =4. SR.Z.§§'¥I5Ih§A??A Sm ?EERAPPA Kfixfiflifii

" I  4_A.G:E3D ABOUT 60 '¥E2';RS
x _ [A CB£.§{Ii&GALfiGALI VILIAGE,
' TQ Aifiifl K}-1'83': BQAPUR

M  -*s.T MALLii{ARJiJI'§ @ MALLAFPA

$19 LAXMAN KAREN!
AGED ABOUT :22 YEARS
RM: CHIKKAGALAGALI VILLAGE,



R/'A GALAGALI, TQ: BILAGI
DIST: BAGALKOTE

LAXMAN S/O HANAMANTH KAREN!
AGED AEOUT 60 YEARS

R/A CHIKKAGALJKGALI VILAGE   
TQ ANI} DIST: BIJAPUR   
ANS ALSO AT GALAGALI, TQ:B§L.?gGI3__ T " 'T
SIST: BAGALKOTE V  

SATYAPPA S10 PEERAPPA KARENI

AGED Aaotrr 65 YEARS   

R/AT CHIKKAGALAGAE3 VILLAG --.  V  - .,

TQ AND DIST: BLIAPURV _   ;  _ = 
AND ALSO AT GALAGALE, 'r(;::vBI§;Ag;I"-- . j 
DIST: BAGALKOTE  _     

LINGANAGOU D533; 0. ;,;AXM:'x:~s.e:30UDA BIRABAR
AGE f) AB;Ob".i' 19"YEARS _

12/A CHi'KKAGP.IAG;'KLiJy'i'i4LAGE

TQ AND 1:1s'r:v.B1..:AsDUR,_  

AND ALSO AT GALAGALE, 'i'Q:BILAG1

Dif-3'1': FBAGALKGTE '-

s§~iAr'~r:«:AREPPA 'S16 MNGAPPA CHIGAEJANI

_'~;a.(;r:.9 'ABQUT 53 YEARS
' V}2;A.,,(:§iIz:1«;.t§<3.ALAGALi v1L.1..AG:::

 ~. *£~'(;3: A?i'II5_"_v»DiE§_'§*i BIJAPUR

AANI3 ALSQ 'AT GALACEALL T'Q:BILAGI

D'ES'1'*:-- Efi.GALKQ'I'E

AA .MAH'A?rAwWA W/Q MALLAPPA JIGAQANI
, AGED men'? 43 YEARS

'  'WA CH£KI{.AC}ALAGALi VILLAGE

 TQ ANY} I}¥S'I': BLIAPUR
AN?) ALSE) AT GALAGALI, TQ:BiLAG§

SIST: BAGALKGTE  PETITIONERS

{BY SR1 EVIRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, AD\fl,)



I. THE COMIVHSSIONER   I- 
REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTIO'i~i'G§%'FICwE 4- _ 

UPPER KRISHNA PROJECII', NAVA  _:. _  .
BAGALKOTE   L  . '

2. THE GENERAL MANAGER' 
REHABILYFATION AND   
RECONSTRUCTION O§'FICE _ -. «_ I' 
UPPER KRISHNA PIIQJECI-,------I~IAvA'--»IsIA<3AI:I -  
BAGALKOTE '  5 _   V. 

3. THE SPECIAL LAND '.§_CQI:eI33moN..E)'I%1éI_::~ER
UPPER KRISHNA PROJ'$C1jT,_ ':II;IyIA'I'frI_ 
TQ AND u'IsI';_I3IIIAPuI§     I.  REESPDNDENTS

(B36 SI§I§'.':I.::i*rI'I5Ia:IIfé:'£§""ARE FILES UNDER ARTICLES
226 551227 05% c:QNSrIfiI'U'I..«:IN OF INDIA PRAYING T0 DIRECT
THE 43-RESIPONDEENTS TC: CONSIDER THE. APPLICATIONS 012'

'"'~.'I'I--iE:_ PETi'l'1()NERS'{EATED 35/1112002, 1?/4/2003 sum

233:4/2903 $46.9? AS PER ANN~C,D AND E ANS ACQUIRE2 AND

 .%éA3*I_ (:(}MP}:3lN3'AfFI§)N WITH ALL CGNSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS

"I'Ci --.T'§iE'u.".R_EM}\INING POF%'I'i{)N 01? LAKES 0? THE
PE'1'iTION.ER]$. '
'FH'?gSE PETITIONS CQMENG 0:4 FOR PRELIMINARY

  '-IIIEARIIIII 'THIS BAY, THE caum MADE Ti-IE FQLLGWING:



QRDER

Gcvemmcnt Advocate is directed to take noii-';jc 1  

of respondent No.3

Heard ” V – ”

Certain iands cf the pctitiizxgéié; were. for the

purpose of U993? Krmhna Piviwi]Hésya§e;%sman’§;§s of lands

of the of the acquimd lands,
have 1;5’3€ respcnéerzts. The gnlrszvance

of the Vp§:1iti<j:iwr $ _1'…sV bits of lands measuring iess

tifianv-':§i;i:e;b_A–1§ect;'e V&:*_3r~}and and less than 1/2 hectic of wet

1§€:'~.of any use to the pefitionera, as it is not

ccéx1difiicafl5';x;igébIe for the pafifioners to cuitivatc such small

_ 'bits éf .. The petitionars ml}; 1113011 circuiar dated

i$$11e:é by the firs: respondent in support of their

he saifi eiztzuiar clearly tiiscioses that if the anacquimd

" of iauds are Kass than 'fa hccat (in the case of irrigated

: land) and less than 1 13-1t':CtI'C (in case of dry iamis) they may

:"""'?

6
also to be acquirreé. Based on such §:§.fi.:–B dafiéd

2. The gzievancr; of tVE1e-~upftit%’io_3;1cer$ “is-.wcli founded

inasmuch as, it is not ec;cqfi.iflng..authofity should have acquired the

infiiusstipilé in pursuance to the mid circular.

In <:¥fth.ké'.same, the foilfixwiag oxdcr is made:

Rafipéndcnts are dimmed to consider repmgentafisns at

1 » . ' – C, B and E ané take action in accordance with law

–.1

having mgardto the cimuiar dateti 29.9.2000 Vida’

as expeditiously as possible, but no’; ” vrgf

four months fimm the date of zeceipt tlsgig ‘«
Accordingly, Writ Petitions I’ V}

ENS