High Court Kerala High Court

Gopalakrishnan vs The State Of Kerala on 24 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
Gopalakrishnan vs The State Of Kerala on 24 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4445 of 2007()


1. GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O.MUSLI GUPTAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :24/07/2007

 O R D E R






                                R. BASANT, J.

                -------------------------------------------------

                          B.A. NO. 4445 OF  2007

                -------------------------------------------------

                Dated this the   24th   day of July, 2007



                                     ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces

allegations, inter alia, under Secs.420 and 376 of the IPC. The

petitioner is the Head Master of a school. The alleged victim

is a Cook of the said school. The crux of the allegations is that

the petitioner has been indulging in sexual relationship with

the de facto complainant for the past about 10 years. It is

alleged that such sexual intercourse was entered into on a

promise that the petitioner would marry her. She allegedly

became pregnant recently. The petitioner refused to marry

her. It is then that she makes the complaint that there was

commission of the offences of cheating and rape. A crime has

been registered. Investigation is in progress.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not seriously oppose the said

B.A. NO. 4445 OF 2007 -: 2 :-

prayer and I am satisfied, in the facts and circumstances which

have been broadly indicated above, that this is a fit case where

the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail. It is not

necessary, in the circumstances indicated above, to advert to the

facts in any greater detail.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C:

(i) The petitioner shall appear before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m. on 31/7/07. He shall

be released on regular bail on his executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

(ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m.

and 3 p.m. on 1/8/07 and 2/8/07. During this period, the

petitioner can be interrogated in custody and the potency test

can be got conducted. Thereafter, he shall appear before the

Investigating Officer on all Sundays between 10 a.m. and 12

noon for a period of one month. Subsequently, he shall so make

himself available for interrogation before the Investigating

Officer as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in

writing to do so.

B.A. NO. 4445 OF 2007 -: 3 :-

(iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law as

if those directions were not issued at all;

(iv) If the petitioner were arrested prior to his surrender

on 31/7/07 as directed in clause (i) above, he shall be released on

his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- without any sureties

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on 31/7/07.

Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/

//true copy//

P.S. to Judge

B.A. NO. 4445 OF 2007 -: 4 :-