Karnataka High Court
Shaikbudan vs State Of Karnataka Through … on 16 July, 2008
(By 3:}; HCGP) to quashxthe entire proceedings in "CC No. 13/ 2004 " before-Prl. JMFC, Muddebiha} and consequently the order of learned III Add]. Sessions Judge, Bidar dated '~.i=E"$.v.1"Z£;f20Q6 in CLRP No.53/2005 and also the order of FT3;JMI<_'Ci,? Muddcbihai dated 28.3.2005 in CC No. 13/ 2004. inns criminal petition coming on for admission this ".da'y, the Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT 01+' KAre2\:;;*i}}a}%:g§.:V. CIRCUIT BENCH: KI' Q 'V: DATED THIS THE 16TH:'A1Dfii%/F3'F THE HON_' BLE MR. §i;ISP1pE .r§"A::.a1s:V:: )A V _ Between: " _ . ' ._ Shaikbudan, =: V' S/o.Baba.sab 'V " _ Age about4O years}, . . H » Occ:Ag1'i. " ' " Muddcbihal, Dist. Bijapur. ij ' _ ' .. Petitioner Md: % . ,. ..... .. 7 _ ' Muddebihal" _Sia¢ion. .. Respondent This exfiznigzxezl fpefitiou filed under Section 482 of Cr. PC, th; petitioner from the said case by setfing asidc ORDER
The petitioner arrayed as
pending trial for oficnecs pf;2n.ishaI§L¢_ 2
353 as 223 rcadwith Section 5’i”1:IPC_, petition.
Tfic jufl ge__ 9:1 fcsoensidcration of documents
filed held that there are grounds
to commithcd oficnccs alleged
I do not find any mason to interfere
the by courts bclow. Accordingly. criminal
isdismlsscd’ .
Sd/-
Em’ Judge