Sri Rajesh Jain vs Smt V S Nagalakshmi on 4 August, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGfiLI..{)RE HR.R.P.NO. 91 OF 1200?
-1.

in me may cover or name won ATBANGALORE
DATED T338 THE 4TH DAY 0!? AUGUST, 2008
_ same:
ms you-ms ma. Jusncs N.K.PA ru.

H.R.R.P.NO. 91 Q1? 2007 rgvn

BETWEEN

1 35% RAJESH JAIN
SID LATE S PUKHRAJ
39 YRS, RIO N0 7011, 7Gf2
2ND FLOORMAMULPET
BANGALORE 53

2 KJSHOFE ROBINS   ;  . "
A PARTNERSHIP Ham av rrs PARTFNER  
RiONO.7(}f1AND?0t2 '- _ . '
MAMULPET BANGALOP,E--3   -- 

  _ _ _  V ...PETlT|{3NER
(By Sri; VARDI-iA§)W~ci' a1_ GUNJAL"AC§V0¢ATfi gxasswr)

AND :

1* .  v s NAeALm<sHM:
 56 'ms, w:cn..mfE=v SRRNIVASALU
  No zcv"-*.. 23:0' E_LR
fv'-AM--iJLPEr'''--~., . 
BANGALORE aaj 1- 

 V . Sm v?'"kauaA'Li NARAYANA

 _ '.49 ms, sro'a;.ATE v Visé-NVANATHAHXH
-« .. .  my No 70:2, 2&9:-"Loon
 ..'LMAIv'£U£,PET
 'aAat<3A:,;oRE 53

V  V  RESPOMJENTS
" Ms H.R.R.P. IS FILED UIS 46(1) cw KR. ACT, AGAINST mg

'  5; summem ANDORDER DATED: 120.2006 PASSED an HRc.No.2:2ws on
 'THE FILE OF THE Vi ACJDLSMALL cauws JUDGE, BANGALORE, (soon.
" zyé ALLOWiNG THE PETITION FILED we 31, 27 (2) (:3) s. 27 (2) (r) OF KR

A T.

11»: me HIGH comm 01? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE HR.R.P.?~¥(I}. 91 as 2092



 e»«reyision.'peii6oni  petitioners stands disrmssed' for

. ..v  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. HRRRNO. 93 OF 201)'?
.2-

THIS HRRP 5 comma on FOR omens ms om, THE COUi§1"- ..
was ma FOL£.Ow£NG:  u __ 
:ORDER:

This matter has been caiied t\f.-/’ic’&.~–.
pfititioners nor me counsel app-firing Ziiflr
present. When this matter Vi
consideration before this -June’
learned counsel appearing that
needfui has been the
effice to verify. eomplied with
the order daied . “i of giving sufficient
opportunity anif’ is that, neither the
ffipearing for mtitioners is

diligent in the case. Hence, the instant

sd/-e

Judge

IN ‘i’HfE:I HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE H.R_RP.N0. 91 W? 200’?