Karnataka High Court
K Sadashivam vs Sri A K Alagarsamy S/O A Krishnan on 6 March, 2009
'ti IIl'IIII Il"'IlI"'II\l'I I Iflvn
» 1235, Avexsnséfload,
* E4£gNt:*ne;:,1;21:'_'EVAV:¢v_$.5e 902..
:3 *ra;§_;_gt<:t-3 t.':O'G'R°'.P cw gamawmaar nuauqfzm
DATED mm mg 1?: my {:9 MARCE 2009, V j _
BEFORE . ~ ~
THE HORBLE 1'm.Ju3*rIcE;..f[: ~
B :
K.S£%IVAEE, .
Rlelfihanyavad Buflimg, "
Ha.m:aa1ak£c'.:ta,«
» V pmxwmma
(BY '5§§:.vi2;am3tUMAR, mmmm}
A.K.A}.A*3$E'M%1SAal§':*-,'-- "
S{n»A.I!Iri5}tz!3.a.j _ ' V ._ "
Fro}:-, : -firee Gayaifiari Tmstile,
R0.» Efi, 3" finer,"
.. . R%P3N;i".')EI'ifT
(3§I'.3....'r.:SA1éGHv1, ADVGCEATE)
V (.'3RL.I?1'. I3 F'E:E}I§ {US 39'? OF THE C-R.?.C.
V '~PR.'*.¥H{G TC} SET ASIQE THE §i€I}ER EQATEE 6'9.f}2.££'l€§5
' 1'-§%.$8EB I3'? THE XV ABEL. £353., BQQUGALGRE IN
...f3CiHC'.325I51'2300 AND C0 B BY THE AIZHEL.
SESQIGES JUDGE A1311') ?.0., F'I'C--i'V, BAHWLLQRE E?
CRL.A.32,! 2335 DATED G8.63.2f}€&6.
,%~'L/
1.
-...... - ..y__..¢.-V.....- V. n.nnnnu-uv- vnurv \.-uunr vr Iv-uut..-...._l\.r-I rllurl LIJUIII UP IEHKNAIAIKA HIGH LUURT OF K.ARNA'I'AK,h HIGH C
THIS CRI..R.P. COMING OR FOR ORDER 'DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE muowme: ~
1. This matter was salad i§a_tha'-rrig1€1i4h=.g':4a§ssifie§;=:#
the nssurance of the Ieamed ca-..:_r_1anaI 'ferv the :tha'j'_:
would proceed with this matter padded . !§t ls caled
again at 1.05 pm. But, nijfha.
2- The.1aameq.-fisahmialv fqr.%%ua'$:§gi$Lo:ident Is yuatrnea In
pointing out éthgt hfié }ii§"'¢wrdI:ct sham-d aw T
I " 3 ._ d atmnh take
nn unp by n
defhnoe ta, "
aqaun§Vma;1t:§I _ofip§md"gpn_t cf any more aqnumme.-ma.
3. %'k%.%4Ta»adg_fi'u£s% conduct of the potmonor am: as
ms I am comtrnlned ta dismiss the petllan
A'
4.' A nmount If my dapoaled by the accused are
' _ bé paId to the respondent.
35/ -:1
Iudgfé