11: THE I-IIGI-I mm or- 1et" "'.§."-.V.:"_' M Aged about 5'53. .. ' - % ' mu shut' ' !E-'3 % % % mir1««:«zé:es.:223s. -wt: Main Road, Kw, r 'III -I 4 ...1-mupnnuenuu ' 1' ..[ B3; Kumar. Adwcateior R-1 a. R-3. J I.' I .I,,,,,,,,,,___I £14.! __I__ n_._..._'_.___._. l '3 -..P.B. 'u'; grant 'aava it.-: % an -1%. .-agai.-.-at .d.t.11_-- (.1 -J- iur1iun19.rng'r\}ni"ad Q91-rzrn-2 nnnned bu». "the; I ........... ..,.. ..--.. ,_.._,.. __ _ Jum in Sr-,D:L},I & C~.-1.1.!!!-, Myuora, in C.C.No. 66'?'7,I199-'5 'VVZ .. .a¢z:;uitting the mapondanrm-amused for the offenms --' efimflWmT I? '.::Va1-"var fif 9&1, 113% ts ya 2 punishable: under Seam.-ions 498--A. 323. 506 mad with 34 cf the I.P.C. 'unis am:-ca; mmfg: rm mf Iluurillg, u * '*7', tiiaa judgtm-nt cnf acquittal panned of V' the: mapurflam ~-- under Sectiarm -W8»-A, 323, sostyead I.P.C. 3.. Th: cagst: is to the efleot *1. ..!,"l £3.-;~ ".§'t.'$.;1E'.!.1"~'?V*fi-1.; to. b.ar9..ea J1 J. I 'I. ..-r«g- 4: 1 1.]. an mm" ' the dam mt int and was aha inrmrmg' ' 'war by AAV""'**a«"attt'actiun1y and even to go for further case of the proaecufinn that the »c-that two respondents, the mother
2
‘e *.:-aa*’*-“…….t m .*….e
E
and used to wold it ‘
‘ an 3.11.1994 at about 9.00 11,111., when the
‘ was in laser house: along with her brothers, 9:
¥nvt:.fl_u1gm1;1gg1;:5dhare1dgmhmthermgoast11efafl1m’of
…—J
9.,
/.
‘I
z::u1’x:1″‘T’T”‘*”::Ifi3.r Ch];:iem.a”‘”C:’I. mm””””‘ sum’ firhafi ‘t.neL’
1:3!’-0-tl’1(%1″3 mm: nut, A-1 is said to have:
bmrmm ar the complainant ::I1 <'i'.lmi1f Vimi °
gillshflzl their heada inwards
Id .
“E
I
i
I-BI-Eh!
………. .. ….. ….,….,,,….._.-
he WW5: aim aaaauiied on the
wall and apex’: frarn mother
rt:-amc, she s.vang« é%§s-::u ,V and thus, the
wntpfinhirxt % k%.q,-1 assaulted the
U’T.J’ll.lfo”Jln”ih.ll§J11.II.l;I1..i’..liv-1’11|;2I.’i.’V HJLFLJ,’ D an W 1. u..: uu. um
ahavee 333$.’ the assault, A-1 aim:
that was lodged on 23.11.1994
Ho. 382.1199′? and, after completion of
V’ iW*.é which .5;-I._……r=1′-Ir?|«-=fl. r-a-r.~r_=rzi_1.’I_mr gt’ t1′-._n
” manta ‘of the G°–Inp’ia1’na a—-n——–u–” “n—-ar—- — a—-n——u–” “n–er–
as well as conducting aizure mahazn: 131.13-B and
getting the: wound cartiflcates E:m.P-5 to 13-?’ from the
}/
an
1’1-I-Ar-.r-..~.~v’1I-\ I-w-vxfl-nu-m Ar he nnnrrn ‘ nicn ‘Pin 3:: V’
‘F
U 1……£:……_, st… ..%……_…n.. …_….t…
£.I$.|.IJ.l’.’!.”-‘ LIJM1 l.«IJ|JJ.”l. ‘IV l.l..LLl-U-PW-l.l.l.
dmnnr P.W.1C.’|, clmrgwskwmt was submitted ayinst the
4.. ‘Mae mzcunmi pleaded mat _;[_L1ilty tn the _
M.nnAn,_,..n.11-=.n.4-n ‘B-TIT… 1 -ha. ‘I1 non-I .1-u-._.p.,_-Q
Jul 54$?-.I¢I-IL.-nfl\.’| I”u’I’l’iIuJ. IJIJ -LL ‘$1.15-I. V
dmummm E:rm.P-1 to P-9 in mppmttgr it-at
stand :21’ the. accused was ‘ex
Ea;-an D1 ‘ ..
al 1nnrm1;uea’ ” and may”
beu1g’ _. t1tesvvV:3cr1t1p!g..ifi1:~.»ith:q§*éIf.’~iIran lodged afiaer hung delay
mam’ ‘ {trim vzicgrufit ‘sf uzmnplaint allngaflnna and
witzmamaxs P.Ws.1 and 2 in 5
,’F’.’i5&.’.fl’l-I>vlI.!qAV”‘_l’l*-~’ i’#i+’fi-fl.A;d!”nflJJ . A an __ .
‘I’l”mM.\JP- U.-.’v’ KID’ J.l.I-I-JoAI.\.I’I3!rIJ’|II. flullhl WLUHU £\d.KKhI-UNI”
no witneas, thnugh praaent,
“L and A-1 aha lodged complaint against the
party on the very same day with the police.
mu-urt also found that the teati1nor1;.’ of P.W.1 wen
….__…..’I….’._¢ -…._ ..
..I.!.fl…………n. £…_…… 41…… 1..
I-{K2111 I-11¢ ‘..ilJl-Iii}-I-.l..I-IL YE nus.
with:-egardtndemm1dofdowryamlharaaamecr1ti11t11at
%’
1.} A -i-1…”. _
I..u.I:: V.
an1’mm:.*tinn mud it also found no cormboratinn ‘
*.-:;-.;.**..1*.mM::}r 91′ ?”?12 M 5 when mm te
I’I’Il’I I-PI’
1mm::nun3r” . Tm-:1ng” n::ateui’ai11;t1-use” mnrm1t1e.u’ ”
proeemxtion case. the trial mutt did not find it: A
an flu it1’tB1’eS’hBI.’l testinuny of P.Wu;i -ta’ ‘
mt acmapt tlm pmsacution case
‘my-and :31! z-aaararabia &=.*.z”..=’.t..__ ‘.-.-‘3.-5
acquittad ma: the ofmegg with
manned” by the acqtxittfl appeal has
fi.. I Pleadar for the
smug and the learned coutlaul
rt 12-: mg R-3% H-2 on-1; an
s.-…….. 19.. .. _. -. ….r ._._..g
oi””%1*1ig____;1§::peai uni hence, the case
‘”f.. “5FI'”‘!rass-,__v’:”.1V;’l::11I1a:”A ” ion 0f the 1ear:1sacl.’ ‘ Cioxaa-rz1msani: Fwaaar’
%tm”:an§.m 113 that the trial court was in -Mror in not
the tuaetinmny of P.Wus.1 to 5 insofar as the
_ “am§auBt. oamittnd by A-1 on these witneazem E aonceemad.
I-I XWI-I-I-$1
J.-ll I-.lJ-DH w’ W I’ I-IIl’I’§Ill.l-lufilullu. IKXIIIEEI $
mes thruugh the teatitmny of the material witnesses anci
J’:
‘R
ggumi ting: Lhmnlze triA.;l not fin
ni’ ti:-E: fiifiaaafi which in: E”iIIpoI”””w:1’f_’ ‘fly
the medical evidmruza of P.’W.1D.
8.. Fast far as that: inlay in ‘V
d, the submission madafigis
bwn pmpm-1y explained by P;VW._} t..1v’1e– ‘
trial murt was at fhultjn of
mrurt fines with regard
tn the: Comaquecntly, the
nflanma gas the: mo. aha has been
:18′ 3;.v1’i£Ii}”J. 1 é¢1;i’i-hmam.fipyIu;mt’ “.u J. uvidwwu “‘u:’y ‘:’l” ‘u””’
_ learned has
on remrd. Hence. the learned
‘ V for the State prayed for c:o11vu’:1:n’ ‘ n of
h.a_t_u:i;_,1:1.’;c:: laagzmci mtmggl for the
.11 ‘ J ..I_,__. ._.l’
4I’%Il3Ifififlm&fgU.$3.fi1fiiEflBTE1§-EflB.lB.)i’DI2’L’lflflyfi511
lodging the complaint and ‘dais delay has not been properly
JV
\-I
befhm the cuurt in support of her compiaint
and there ia no ncnmtion of demand 0:? A
FEs.4~5,0E3f§IJ’- by flue accused V’
1’1_L.i_.rt_lJ;y, 1i1:;:L1.,g,11 ware
..:l.._.. _.11_____1 .._’ _ _.
pi”-merit iirhéfi Ina euaugau the V
prmawfinn has of tho
mder1,mn’ ‘mule-nt w1d:n1aa'” am. “I$31.e1w.-fa’ to rely can
the fintexmtued V. to convict the
agaicnst the oumpinimnfa
was taken in respect of the said
f”urthe.r subazms” sian made is that the
to atay away her huahanrl
V -._ .L.. -1.._ _._…._. 1-…..__-…._ 1…- 1..-._1.._._ ……. _….. .. ………………
vflzmai. 1.; w” mruu m:=ru.u:am:u;ii’Ls’i E pun-I: E
am that ths mmplainant can live with heat’ huahand
and mm; with her in-lawn and because nf than mefixsal
affl-1.t::-this demand ofttmoanrplairmnn a oaaehas boon
med afinreaaid. I-Ie:r1c:o,the
mt:-7.:a*..-a%.4. 3%’-‘….5t t…e a
1ziawm.”icenbytImt1iaieauficwm’cnfia”idtabaawa$ib.’e
View from the evidence on record and, as
«ermn: is callad for againat tlms order
glawaaafli by the trial court.
11. In the mm of the aubt.*iisi3_jfor1fii*-ntfjxsarle 1:4i1e: .
far c:c:rm;idnara1:inn__ is was
ju,ai:i1″1zi=e:i atrquittiifig :,m.–?%…A.b;;.%.«.,,_..-1 …r;d __ ,1 of
2.
3 _
all the affiaxwas Wifi’1__wh5_fiH E¢’.§’§§i.§3h.l”fl6u:,,..V’ 3 ” ‘.
it is, nwt§eaa_afy”Tv5ip Ti _ .– power of tile fippeilaia
Court. and the Apex Court’
k nhae;#gIui;io.ns’.Vim~;_A %¢a§%¢ :31′ Ana Kumar Va. sum of
1″.3’B} worth ra::a% at this
I
1
above aaici jufigmafit, % Afl C¢u.. .. 1.19:5
‘A in ma embargo on an appellate court
V’ ‘ –r::&i.riaawi1t1g the: en.-idmxse upon which an order of
arrquittal ia” baaad. Genemally. the order of
au:::q1.111:ta’ lahaflnntbemterfer-ad’ ‘ ‘ wi1:h ‘bac:ause1:’iie
prmumptinn of immoemze of % ra.r;u7;usa”u is
fuufiwr a fi& ‘:73; a~”.1it*..al. ‘!.”.’.:-..; g9H._…n1’1
R _
2′
tltmead which mm thra-ugh the web of
adminiaimtion ofjustioe: in oritninal cams is that__
.if1Lwo vksws are possible an the evidenote
in tha case, one: pointim to the guilt .
a.-m:msvafi and the other 1:: his inJ:1m:a11c:e,
which is favourable to the I
aduptnd. the paramount of
court ii: to ensure that of
u§~hm~. E1_I:Lfl,$_i_II_3lI.!:.3 ¢_1,-.y 5
{met uwn the
aeqtlitted.
for m whethar any
0f the any ofience or
mast. Emu-. of M.P. (2002)
4 Is5;% gamma (cRL.) 735: (20052) 2
am princsiple to be followed by
court consitiesring the appeal
L:1::’5.’*.§’i.””””””1’t”. (if at in 11′: 2lI1l.£1l’l£fif€I
‘VJ
zmenaaa-c_’I’V-st for clans: go. Ifth imu mud ‘
_ ..G__..
I I uxumnnabla and relevant and
I
4’…’
I
I
I
I
I
I
materials have been unjustifiably
ee1in1ira.n1:ad in the pzuzess, it is a compellirlg
x-amison for “.
13. The trial Court has ax:q1.1itted the rmpondant-aoouuod
2x
B
11)
ad Esngerfl gang; bv trial Court for
, I ,
4. 451.- …….._……A.2-..
at tfrfi flflfiéliifiiifi. Dfiifiilfs um prua»v:t_=!;uDI1
the camplairamlt and her brothers
eatabl?m1’1 the case agaimt the accused in
asaaulit mmznittmi by the amused 4: ‘V
are :-.r.,-. 111.: t…..*imn_n},r -1’ 1- _ ..,._.
ii
* at ”
.m not i.nnpam’ mmmame ‘A ._bf:’.’1.v’:.:1a’* * in A
awept. tzha aamaa far aha
fizruntl that the :awja% 5 diaclnua
impwunmemt fiéu1fi1;w.iitB.g,§3 to V’ of the material
d-slay in {f m imiepenxhrzt witnesn
was tautinnny of the clone
at i:’41″3sa -:f~;c~iiv11:n1’Vt.~.i1A1…’n.;’.a.11t and all tlmse led the trial
on record with uun_n:x::1n’ ‘ I1 and
…………….. – …a
Lu u: I.» pnJav.7.:u”‘ “‘
.”_=. n. 1 n–_…… ‘l.._’!.’l …1…..a. .. r..n…:|
I Jul 1%.” lll..l..fifi|.l.
uouru
‘ _1:a beyond all reasonable doubt. It in on
hr the mid view. the and Court acquitted the
Hnvmg regard to the position in law as has been
J “11.-:é..Ji-.+.i. 1:23,-r Alt:-=n:..a: €.’im.I.rI.: :11 mg abov: mgzxgtzuhfi mag wlmgt
;1_.___ ‘..’ I”_..__A.
K461-11″
in-ta’imsaaniawhaihariheviawtaxun”‘*~’rTyum””mu
mnh¢saidtobaapoaa1b1eviewemm’glngfi’omtl1e
I’ .
Jr
V v
II
..-ldm’m.;u-.3r;-3.1!. 1′:-;ur.’=.nr.,r.I.’t:’|. ;-1.I..r.Id. i£a:.II.!w_rt;-.14 in flag: afirlna ‘ua. than
mu… _ _–. __ ._..____. – _’ j_._._..
I.__ __
irzterfmratsnoe by this fiourt ‘m: not for new
armttna-I vixaw is also possible. It in with the ahaifg
that the: evridenos on rword will have to: be “‘ ” = H ”
14. T113 charge against the
marrjflfla P.W.1 an
human-vs her in cmmacfion} that and in
4» Ir. ‘ ” ‘ .
** ~*”” stat.-11 ‘aha m”*-.uf.:}a=..£%«”;. *;*.:’.’s-..-s_*.3:–3’….*…..’*” m”……,=-‘1-= bath
pays’ imanlijr and at about -:-“ma
A..M., um house of the
with her brothers and
a..H-an M4 c.w.s!, c.w.3, c.w.4,
thus, the accused persona
ioflfienne punimable under Section: «+93-A,
.-Em-:1 is aat.-e,-5. 23.11.1994. M i ‘A t. 1.
a23,%%&md sé5 the IPC. The complaint in marked as
ulna”:
in ta: have tame’ 11 paw’ a.c::nru.1ng” to the
itxwlf on 3.11.1994{wrongly xnentioned an
_: .”3..11.l’SP§|5 in the charge franud by the trial Court).
‘lhmfifiare, the first infirmity which appears at that
9’-l_.–‘
«’1’.
I2
‘l_:1-%_ug;1,m ~H’__g__f in _’_11’1_:r_1____i1’|n1’n d1a’i.I’ ‘i ]_t_1da’ina gf the
“”””””‘” ‘- ‘I’——
3
I
J
I
I
_-… I ‘I… ‘I…..! .._..
aompfimint. There is a delay of aifnoat 20 “yrs 1:1 nma:II1g*.__ ‘
the cumplaint. As per the FIR, the place cf
about. 1 Km. from K.R.Pb]1’sce station, Mysore.
dexlfi)’ has beer: flxphined by the? V
is a iyped’ co1npi.a.initV:V:’1*s1nnJIIg’ V , V’
mm. ist ahaohxtely no m¢mn’%¢:;ag%¢ehy ‘ the
c£m1p1m’11t. p.w.1 who um’ the wife of
first menu: h£§4”.d5P®~§d%1i%i that afbur the
-mm-“””fi was mfia ‘m
E
E
E
G
E
.« E
gi
Kr!
5.:
bung" aa1'ra:cv>u.tv tlm parties and as thaw. the comp1a1:nt' . This 1:_h_e_: of _----':u.--......._ .|_...._.'I
8§ififl_1_’E”E”fli” is mt fafihmflfifif, if; the dc:-.tai’Lae’u Lypuu
as per EILP1 that we after 20 duyn nfier
anaideuit. Thus promuuon has also examined P.W.8
who did conduct the initial iI1vm1:Tgatinn.]ikB
~ the “ma; ae:.’~.¢.ii.:.’=.,-gr, FIR tn; t.11_.a. f_’.m.1_rt 13.4 ,t.n::r ELF?
anti mncimztfirng spot umhamr as per Emfi on .-‘3-.1″‘&.1§”‘-.-:-‘r
and thin witnma. in the czourae of his gross-axanflnafinn
fir
13
an |:II’rua1’I,:,nrl % at 1: .r-I-“u-I uni r-n1-u-11-u–1- rnr -:ru-I.rIIn*I-‘:flaI-‘;rI.I1 n ‘I!
‘J1-‘5 IH’\.H-Ivlulfi-I I-Infill.’ -IILJ I-I-Ilul 4IiDFI- I-OIIIIEI-InIWd’Io_IlrIuD’ v$ocI-VIIIIWQ-wfijuflvln Ufilfflfillh
rim ::m.1ae for the daisy in imaging the complaint
ha dams mt know as m where and how the
typed and by whom. Thus, the wrplanaticn K
mt um’-»._; aatiafim:’I:o:-y and it is
“JR fii want 1.! fie nu:-my w1u;u.;u. en. mum
.s….1.. _.1._ – 1…….’n… ……:.n…1…. ‘… *.I.x’I……..fi’a..-;..’…”‘
pz:n].1ce’ vr-stat1′.~::11, yet no c:omp1um’ bdm V
paint ant” time. ‘I’h’a about
the pwaemztinn mm the View that
war
1.11.: . .g’_.pl.si1′:a,n_i:’a $.19:-avmpafle amp: to an
w’m.Ie’ . amuse by ‘ imam %c.-.:mp~ { ~
11 5 ‘ =_ gala-rfinrvt ‘m*’iH1 nlurnv-r1 ‘I11 {Fun
In I ‘Id-Jbln-lI’.lnfi.d’J’-‘ ‘ ,.V . V ._ t “7551. _w’$ 1′ -Qj
mmpia.h1t ii. in the etricieusnee of F.’\ii.1
imkient, she went to the police
ledge: any complaint and says that the
»’ IJo.J.\.IJ.l!IIUlLH.JL’|.E’..H’l.l LURE
tn cn11::e on 18.11.1994. P.W.2
plum-un.aa…n.-3 Eu-I. ‘ AMI
-II-I IL” UVALMJUJV Iluluifl-ll WIWII-«Ia Kim!”
«I
” , he so.-nmpanm’ d by ‘P.W.1, 1=’.w.4 anti F’.T£7.5,
” um um poflco station and mgr also found All Devaraj
prawn tl.’1ere and tha said. had been sent to
11;: pm; t1r1_e pause, RW53 Ggurzggl; ix; thlil of
W
‘J
L
D’
’14
‘1 -I , , . .,, i ,..1, . n 1-: Ann; ¢L_ ___11__ __’I_.L__’_+__j
GV1’Z1BII1′..’v’3 REE E-IuE1’l’.fl3I. HIRE D11 u.’.’l…L.l..J..H5’1′,. U16 IJDIJIJE3 (JlZl’llE.1I’§.l.
the wmplaint from P.W.1 and tlwrx amt the
hnapital for tceatlnant. P.W.-4 Hagarqj says in
that won a1’tm’ the £1′:-aiatleant, his bmthuar _
Han g__1_*1rl Han» ‘I’ 5|}
Icahn’-II ‘ll’IIil’ an-is _r-W…-..n.w –Ivan-u –n -¢fi ::L:’—uowf-n ‘up–v
i
3;
5
% E
3
“<2
:3'
treatment. Pfi'iF.5 fiharada 3.139 says aeéri
.-
10. Thus, we: we on
3.11. 11994, P.W.J1.é’L11d othmu: station and
lodged the is not fiarth
f:’u’::’:’.t1L praamutian and no
.._.__.1..__. .. M . VM h 1….- ‘ft.
V’, ‘- ,’ ~. Z ‘
£u],uunJu?i’fliE.a1″£i is “mu
said mmpmxg mm-arm. it is clifiicult to view the
,f V’c::pm1;i1i£i:h1;T,:Ex:F1AA fimt complaint lodged with 1:11:
afinr the im-idtmt. The fact that injured
L: théé a.1nt._n;._.I.:r_I:1.. an t1_IL.: 3352::-tr mama d_n_13r is 44159
———-J — – _._
.. ….R._ ..’I __
rhc fifidcfzcfifi faf the fiiiauunou as
‘ Razifmlcrm. ‘ hna. Suit who has stated in his evade’ nae
% um :m1.1=.=:94 PC1472 brought somaaheldur, Ganevah
é Raga:-aaj far traaunent with. the history of assault.
1:933. Tifiiifl 1:|.-ran, Flnfl 1” 11′!’ him All 1:: A ff ,
‘III I-LI-‘Milo! ululfl-I-‘IA 1′ V’ -I ‘In
H ‘7’? ‘I 35*!’ Itolui ul-‘If III-I-2§IJlIu$FI’nIn§ V!
S)»,
c/..
A 1 an-In. 4-In Malina.
Liam -*’1HLl. M43 LU l..l.’.r1l.~ .i.lJI.fl.-Md J.’uvUl.\uI. a|.|.u.-I. who
5′
mad’ A tau: be the mmpinfilt aurfafi aim. the daisy afahnou it
243* days and though flilfi said complaint in
Wm’ ‘ all the «mm right “L by
Pawal
‘r .u;~…V””.’1;;1;”.-. .-
_J_i.|: – nun:
seaaéri rifnmplaiii’ ‘W flria “‘f;”*=7si*” “f::ar.’i’l”
ludgingthcsoomplaint. %
I’
__ J.
17′. Tm sttapicign Ixidiring fif
by was by the prosecution
‘- I – I I u
.u.m.1.u.. In 15311 13 3.» t-I-D«4L’u| ‘.13 .I..::~.r””‘ “‘:x.’u’33.”;*’u-5-‘:'”1′.’: a1′,r”.’.’..u..-..””u*”*
that the accused pa:-non:
Ra.45,0D0l-. Therefore, the testimony
uf the Court w1th’ yd to demand of
‘:1._ya-wrgru :_:f:’ti:1g:sv in that oannwtion, aoaumed
.n.__.._.._…..n. .f_’I’I_. I.._ d..’I……. _…_.u…………1 1…-.._…—nun.-g u.-nu
u 1- I
. “””iL’L””””‘?t’ie*Ii” ii}. “Li”1′:’:I”i. 11:111. mun IJEJ um mu DI-‘a’|.ifl.I.l.|’.lIE
«mmplauu-‘ . Ex.Pl, she not only omits to males’ 3.
.”menti.an ntnf dennand of dowry mzununt but on the other
hand,gim-asaemnohi1t.batl1eamusedbyatatir1gi11th¢
L
I
IQ
‘J ‘A
1:6
that the accused pal-arms did not Imus: for
.5
Ci-fifiiI’*”1′”j_’?f defiiaiid ‘r.T”x’. -:-fl fix: 6-t’c”” }””id. atafoa t1*”*t thfifir’. i’
F
1:: am» m1nplain.a11t.’a family to parfiarm the
they crkaaired and thus a totally ainrmm 1
-‘–‘w
$3.1;-.inta”4a’—…r3,a=~.1*i.-‘-,m. I i 1m
II-up!!!-‘Una-I’ll’ –
trm’ t aha waver rmraah ii. in ‘ner Véihfifit u:|a'”” V
amuam dc-mamiing by
the p1-n1ae¢:m1tin11 i.g., the dowry
dnmanded and ulznecrwd that
tietrnaxxcieaci by the.
accused haraelf says in 1191- avidence
that 3351-sv anyom of her family numbers
nfmw _, by the acclmad.
1-3.} A case of tha prmsecutjnn flmt all the
fiezfl-om .2-;_nn:_a.1.:1.:::d F113,; ha: mambecra
1″ .1fi%, pi: tr: :ax?;c;’a.::5Ea1’1. 36.1, all ‘t;”‘a
V. —1.1 @I’4V§Iia¢.’-»s::1.;Ltic::-11 witnnwe.-3 who are the close relatives of P.W.1
not speak anything about A2 and A3. Axxxarding to
matarfial witnssawa far the pmaacrutrlon, thus: mnthuaw of the
j;’,/
r”
I7
cnmpfluinmalmsaidmohavaba-axlaasatllhadbyflle
I
amua-a;-d. ‘l’l’:.$ aw.-1″. pa:’a…~n r-1:: L’~…n”.,,,……….-=r-=-1′-*-‘*’=* …..u
D
I
I’?
(‘I
am-
I’
bsen eum.max1en:i” ‘ by the prosecution for the
lens:-wn ta it. Except P.W.6 Rajanna.
wnusm-” was are all close relatives -‘P’.*W.«1
goxmbmratc cash other even
.1 ……_..-…..:l …..’..,
_1_.._._._ 1… V’ ,_ .’._.._.*.
5%.
___.. .’_”___ ….l”
I.
_’III .
I3. ‘B3131. I32’
mid wimmsw barting.I-‘.1?_i.l’.~~di5 ‘ T in
th:a1r’ mm, ‘ with regard’ ‘ f1*;£a’V:’ f long delay
in lndging the jun: has aha found
1:11 f 11% m-Ii gt.-rI.a.n
noun a-n¢un-s–u . rv -I~IIIn.nIrw–u—t
41.. ..
raga:rd tit?» aéaaniit” acéfiaed rm eaah one ai’ um
W
~. 1?. in aid to have been uc.c:u.t-reti an
baa am: fmm the evid-ems of the
nwI::ee’ * k , them has been inordinaw delay marl
spot mahazar whiz’-h amcrrdim to P.W.8 was
..1 _¢.«I_-E .«….. :1 nru .. ………
” |l.ia'”‘-I-«I LI’: “nil-Elli!”
” …_”V’:.’ata5t?.:exu:en1as mm wimcasm have been recorded by F.W.11
V V ‘ -. fake after om month.
\ –
‘P7
ir1bareat.ad tastnuu” 113; :1? PIN. 1 aJ:1d her brothers’
and anutlmr relative P.W.5. Thea: wilrnesa-aw dd:
tzaxmiratxanfly avail with regard to 6:: ‘V
” ” “‘»-n’
w ml: ptflmtsn wag aamultgd
hr by accused ‘1’~¢’o.i.”‘-«,I’1′;~,is (if fifih V
midmm-. can reward. th«afnfi_a1 ._r1n1:t aafi: to
W ?.”_ If’: but i;”:ua complaint
wrsixm figybyfl by the mmpla1nan’ t
the Court. It is therefioro.
«tnnv _’ 1 (:.mu~r. fbund it unsafe to accept
. ‘V’ V’ N’ 2 >V ‘V7 . . I
n vna+-ma-ca’ txnfannaaea an my 3%?
‘ ‘ = the. case: beta” re the Court when’
,,__ Ltn their statnment hefura the polioe but than
and her people took auifixzient time in order to
‘T to the taaneand it is also mrident from the very
_……._._…..:, .’. 1…..:_’I.. .–.. ‘In:-It ‘lam.-I Luau balm-nu’ aid!’ J-“Inst
‘u. fifiz FINAL uI:u..I. |..n:u.u.
21. In t.1:1..l% m”:…;.-I.:_I..n. it I; t mamjnngd m 1:119
delay in lodging the -rxzrnpiaint poiice ia a–.f'”‘r5a1
infirmityr in the pcmaecutian case ar1d
oaxrzpkauitmmt. and her family rnmmubere went
utatinxi an the vary warm: day and V
-nan ‘I”IuHI.1.’lI” H5131} 3&1!’ in mflflnnnn ‘I’ 9&5!’
xiv; l..I\.I’.M’.l..|. “J .I.I.-I. vluuvnnvvp vvg.a,_1-
lodged’ ‘ on 3.11.1994 is ‘awn: nat
eatplaixieci by the proaeofiflgn. to be
muntiaruarl rm-. the aa1ayL is an
amount of and he give a
refizzr tut: of fiajan Vs. State of
‘I’an111’ fia: iu, CRIMES 756, and the said
Lb: Law anon
is uf ;_:ua1’an1nLu1t i3:nportaJ:1x:e
case. It will be a vital and
.V piano: of evidence to corroborate the.
x :._!I_’JI”aV1 .E%iP1d¢ifl¢& to be adduced during the trial.
” subject of insisting upon a prompt lodging of
the mport in to obtain early information not
::nr11y Iwdingtimaanaaiianbs irutaino about the
partp1ayedbj.rth:aaccunaci,ti1anatL1reofihe
ir’1c:i::ixmi: thfi at-‘ai’nfi’n”i1i'”‘ fif “rv’i’::ri?uafi. 1?’
Q.
-/..
30
£1,133′ i_11 lodug,i.mg t_h_a=_: .fi_rg1.:
_u1txa- acrftaan rmulta in confabulatinn and danger
zxrmgna in flue possibility of a coloured
after dnlibe.-raticn and eonaulation. It will
u1’bL:rly umafia to base a camnbtion upoati. M
ewicimxce, when the law was .m:t._§:t
swan after the im:id»er1t, ‘uut.__wgBT .. AA
cnaar 14 -days, though am
2:. Wm laarnnd also
…… .,………. a_n_d
they am w mflnaij
291. 183. AIR 1975 so
19529 2435 and AIR 1933
SCAM” . ‘. ‘ ,
.’ to the law laid down by the Apex
cams r-sfiezrmd In by the learned
rw……A…..V…1 .r_..- ‘ …….. ……I
I.-uuIL=ugu1_m=1_’L’,;1u 1 ‘fififlu 3.” $314 una V91: aaawn
1|-‘mg; tnmunnz nnnaaia
‘ cam itself is I} in carious doubt not arfly
-:31′ long delay in lodging this complaint. but
” E .L _
T ‘ an-“xztpluaaint version also being not adhere}: by P.W.1 111 the
“‘ ea:m1_z._rg«;= rzf hex: with to the demand for
dowry; the ‘by the “trial Cc:i.i.r””t ‘un::um'”””‘-Fa s..u;'”-“”;1″‘t.
(\
it.’
he :___}:1-_ tamer Lang Lug
……. ._’…… _…
.. .. .1 J. .. 11 1-1..
1’___’I_;_. 1__A __..1:v_..
uuugc I133 I’|.’.f~[BI’
analymg the tnaatimnny ufamh at’ the
has u::a:>mi-siecmd an impact cf the dalay in
oumlcrlairxt cm. the ‘humanity of .of
:n~i’~lna,m,saAn m.–nu-‘l nu: n11:-u.
“I.IIC-§.QTF-FKQW ‘NJ-slflflo URI! I-IIHn”In’&C’ I-Alli! VHFEIJJ-Nu”
if:-aurt with the uantzirwa V
raiacs a reaaonable sus;§iaion_~’a’Ey§iit case,
am it :’:.a.nr1z:It bu mid _ ‘ , but on
ma c-th-er ma, mgma% the trial Ca-urt
ii. a 1t}”**a’, fi”a €u an r-“mm-5.. uk-
such , memigr _V-wfiavoaaibio to mice” another
mew” af ‘ “‘::’1” that Itself’ will not give scope
for Couft. with the ardent of auqu1t:t.a1′
Qf mg mg 1a_.a’g down. by t_h1_a Apgzg
……_. _………’l …- -1…
nn ..;’-:3 ‘Br… …I… .. __ .._.E .n._ …..
111 (73.55 FUICHTQKI L0 515 H.FK3VUu
reauoné, the appeal is liable to he
% it is dismiaacad.
01:10!-
I in’
‘has ru-n-m